Instead of “New Atheism,” how about popular atheism?

I should have included this in yesterday’s post, but here’s an idea: instead of the inaccurate term “New Atheism,” or the in-jokey “Gnu Atheism,” how about “popular atheism”?

That captures the real difference between Dawkins, Harris, and Hitchens compared to their predecessors: they had unprecedented success reaching a mass audience. If we’re lucky, we could even con the haters into adopting the term, since “popular” has negative connotations as well as positive.

There are no good arguments for the existence of God
Did Chris Mooney have a point?
Peter van Inwagen's argument for Christianity
Bertrand Russell explains Ray Comfort

CLOSE | X

HIDE | X