Currently reading: Thomas L. Thompson’s The Mythic Past

I’ve previously discussed Silberman and Finkelstein’s book The Bible Unearthed, a popular-level book on Old Testament scholarship which argues that nothing in the Old Testament prior to the stories of David and Solomon has any basis in history, that David and Solomon probably only barely have a basis in history, and that key parts (namely most of Deuteronomy through Kings) were composed to serve the political agenda of King Josiah in the 7th century BC.

But I don’t want to just trust just one source for my knowledge of Old Testament scholarship, so I’ve decided to read a book that takes an even dimmer view of the historical value of the Old Testament: Thomas L. Thompson’s The Mythic PastIt might be seem natural to see Thompson’s perspective as “more anti-religious” than Silberman and Finkelstein’s, though I think it would be a big plus for the parts of the Old Testament in question if they didn’t turn out to have been written to serve an ancient despot’s agenda of religio-ethnic cleansing. So we’ll see what happens as I read Thompson’s book.

Why do Christian philosophers of religion believe?
Kris Komarnitsky's Doubting Jesus' Resurrection
William Lane Craig rationalizes his lie about Ehrman
My debate with Randal Rauser is out!

CLOSE | X

HIDE | X