Scripture, Church, Tradition

Screen Shot 2015-01-24 at 3.43.09 PMAt its simplest, Protestants believe in Scripture alone and Roman Catholics believe in Scripture and Tradition. Postmodernity raised its hand in this discussion to remind Protestants that there is no pure “alone” and that all interpretations are mediated by both the individual interpreter and the context of that interpreter. That is, Protestants too have a Scripture and Tradition mode of actual interpretation. That is the simplified story.

Many have undertaken to draw up an account of the relationship of the two and one of my favorites is by John Franke, The Character of Theology, which was discussed on this blog way back in 2005 (here is the opening post). Franke offers a solid attempt for Protestants to grapple with Catholic senses of tradition/Tradition and a Protestant attempt to deal with the same.

What issues arise for you that prove that Scripture alone is challenged by an interpretive tradition? What issues make you wish we go back and start all over again with nothing but the Bible?

It’s time, then, for a Roman Catholic attempt, and nothing finer than Matthew Levering’s new book, Engaging the Doctrine of Revelation, which has the very clear subtitle as an orientation to where Matthew is headed: The Mediation of the Gospel through Church and Scripture. Matthew lives about a mile south of me and we have had an occasional lunch together, and I have to admit my admiration for his virtue and faith as well as his knowledge and clarity in theological articulation. [Image credit]

His opening introduction is the concern of this post as I, along with a Presbyterian, will be reviewing the book in more detail and substance in a later post (more about that later). The introduction is about Catholic and Protestant theories of Scripture since Vatican II.

Prior to Vatican II was the Theological Commission’s Schema that was then responded to by then theological advisor to a Cardinal, namely, Joseph Ratzinger (Benedictus XVI). Vatican II produced Dei Verbum, probably the most definitive doctrine of Scripture available to Catholics. Levering then discusses three major proposals for Scripture (and tradition and the church) in the Catholic tradition, with this summary:

The first (Dulles) focuses on the category of “symbol” so as to express the richness of revelation, with its interplay of event and word, and to get beyond propositionalist accounts of revelation—without denying the role of propositions. The second (Haught) leaves propositional revelation almost entirely behind and argues that “revelation” simply consists in human images that express God’s love for us and that orient us trustingly :oward transcendent mystery. The third (O’Collins 2011) securely retrieves propositional revelation, but in a manner that prioritizes the personal dimension of revelation that the advocates of “symbol” highlighted (18).

Levering clearly liked a predecessor, René Latourelle, and he interplays the issues of personal revelation and propositional revelation. He disapproves of the trend among some Catholics to downplay proposition.

For the Protestants, he discusses Paul Ricouer (who downplays proposition), Richard Swineburne (who affirms it), and Colin Gunton (who also affirms it). He couldn’t have chosen three more significant players. But the issues of revelation, Scripture, tradition and church are pushed into special categories, and he focuses most on Gunton who thinks tradition and church get too much value among Catholics. Levering responds:

Without placing the Church over revelation, the Spirit can guarantee the Church’s preservation from error n its definitive interpretations of revelation—which differs from guaranteeing the truthfulness of everything the Church says and does. This perspective enables us to give due weight to “the church of the living God, the pillar and bulwark of the truth” (1 Tim. 3:15). In short, we can accept the existence of errors within the Church’s works and teachings over the centuries, so long as we do not suppose that these (reformable) errors produced a rupture, that is to say a false definitive doctrine about faith or morals in the heart of the transmission of revelation (27).

Here is Matthew Levering’s big idea for the book:

My book focuses on the mediation of divine revelation, or specifically on how the Triune God, ever present and active, sustains the handing on of revelation by “the Israel of God” (Gal. 6:16), the community that Peter describes as “a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, God’s own people,” whose mission is to “declare the wonderful deeds of him who called [believers] out of darkness into his marvelous light” (1 Pet. 2:9) (28).

""...the absurdities of backing a quintessential wolf in sheep's clothing..." It seems to me is ..."

Why The Patristics Were Silenced In ..."
"The sixth point is largely the ethos of St. Andrew's Theological College and Seminary: http://www.divinityschool.org/ ..."

Why The Patristics Were Silenced In ..."
"A blessed day to you and your family as well Scot! And to all Jesus ..."

Our Thanksgiving Blessing To All Of ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment