Bethel Lecture

Last Friday Bethel University, under the excellent leadership of Chris Gehrz and Christian Collins Winn, hosted a colloquium on Pietism. This event built on their earlier colloquium that brought in scholars of Pietism. But this session was not just on Pietism but was instead an exploration of some of Pietism’s connections, and I was asked to lecture on Anabaptism and Pietism. [I'm not sure what I will do with this paper, but somehow I will use it for publication, so I won't do much with it here.]

I spent loads of time this Winter studying Anabaptist’s origins, and focused my attention on the works of Balthasar Hubmaier since he was the first major theologian. So, to keep to the topic, the presentation compared Hubmaier with the Pietist vision of Spener (and Johann Arndt). Evangelicalism could learn much if it would devote itself to developing both of these heritages: the Anabaptist and the Pietist. I’m tempted here to delve into the paper but will avoid that.

Some highlights for me:

* Meeting and getting to chat with Chris Gehrz and Christian Collins Winn. Both of them are fine scholars who made singular contributions to the earlier colloquium published as The Pietist Impulse in Christianity.
* Seeing some former students, including Marie Leafblad and Julie Capon, and I have to reserve special place for Mark Safstrom, a former NPU student who is now a professor of Scandinavian Studies at the Univ of Illinois. He did an excellent paper on PP Waldenström in the above volume (showing Waldenström’s political and social vision, clear elements of Pietism that are often ignored).
* Visiting Bethel University the first time — I was blown away with how attractive a campus it is. And I got to see an old friend from my student days, Mike Holmes, who has had a distinguished career as a professor at Bethel.
* Meeting Jon Sensbach, author of Rebecca’s Revival, an exceptional study of an African Moravian woman evangelist in the Caribbean.

Pietism: What is it?

I was once speaking to an audience of students and professors when a respondent suggested something I had said was “pietistic.” I reacted viscerally to it because for the respondent “pietism” was a slur and evoked such things as individualism, legalism, experientialism, lack of sound theology, and anti-intellectualism, while that respondent thought he was an example of biblical theology and genuine Reformation theology.

It is so easy to stigmatize a group in the way a term is used. Pietism is one of those terms being used by some as a way of calling into question the sufficiency of one’s Christian orientation.

Is Pietism a completion of the Reformation or a distraction? Where do we find Pietism today?

Which all raises the question of what pietism is…

… but before I get there two more ideas. I teach at North Park University, NPU is connected to the Evangelical Covenant Church, the ECC is overtly connected to the Pietism of European Christianity and many draw much of their faith orientation from the likes of Philip Jakob Spener, whose famous 1675 book Pia Desideria (Pious Desires/Wishes) really did set the table for Pietism. The second point I’d make is this: I didn’t appreciate being called a Pietist in part because my orientation is Anabaptism and not so much Pietism. Do they overlap? Of course, in a number of ways, but they are not the same. Not that I have anything against Pietism and in fact I embrace Pietism (as sketched below), so let me outline how Spener more or less sketched what Pietism was: [Read more...]