I Think, Therefore I Am…. Catholic.

The feisty writers over at Patheos’ Catholic Portal are a diverse lot:  a rough and tumble mix of converts and reverts and cradle Catholics.

I am all of the above.

I am a Cradle Catholic because my parents herded me to church on Sunday mornings, scrimping and saving to provide twelve years of Catholic education.  I disappointed them, though, when I reached adulthood—veering into a guileless agnosticism, then stumbling back to belief via Unitarian Universalism (such lovely music!) and evangelicalism (such great Easter dramas!)  Then again,

I am a Revert because one Saturday afternoon, discouraged by life’s vagaries, I walked alone into a Catholic church and slid quietly into the rear pew.  Praying from the heart, perhaps for the first time, I encountered the God of my youth, Who introduced Himself in an explosion of knowing and loving and bewilderment.  I struggled under the tutelage of a kindly priest who answered my belligerent questions about angels and purgatory and eternity—until one day I believed.  And

I am a Convert because each morning I wake to the promise of a deeper awareness of God’s love evidenced in the Eucharist, and with a firmer resolve to sin no more.

From Willow Creek to Sacred Heart: A Former Evangelical Learns to Love the Catholic Church

Chris Haw’s journey—from lukewarm Catholicism, into earnest Evangelicalism, and finally to a renewed and vigorous Catholic faith—is a familiar one.

Like Chris, I too was raised in a Catholic home but was drawn away from the Catholic faith in early adulthood.  Peer pressure, lack of understanding, personal pride, and the tumultuous ‘60s came together in a perfect storm of  dissent—and for a number of years, I scarcely looked back at the 2,000-year-old tradition I’d left behind.

When I did experience a resurgence of spiritual hunger, I—like Chris Haw—was attracted by the energetic faith of the evangelical community, where worship was devoid of what I then regarded as “musty old rituals.”  It was only after several years in an evangelical community that I reexamined my basic suppositions and returned to my Catholic roots.

From Willow Creek to Sacred Heart is Chris’s personal travelogue through the denominational morass toward union with the Catholic Church.  With the perspective acquired during years in the nation’s largest evangelical community, Haw has much to offer:  Wide-eyed, he gapes at profound mysteries of the faith, and his awe is contagious.  I, a Catholic for many years, have come to take for granted the mournful silence of the Good Friday liturgy, the provocative image of Christ crucified.  Haw teaches me to be still and to reflect on familiar treasures.

But while Haw, as a Protestant, had once been offended by some of the common expressions of Catholic piety, now at Sacred Heart in Camden he inhaled the fragrant spirituality in Catholic art and traditions.

Teetering on the wall between his newfound Catholic faith and his recent experience at Willow Creek, Chris Haw experiences the point/counterpoint of Protestant asceticism and Catholic aesthetics, and finds peace amid the Church’s great beauty and seeming wealth.  He considers what had been a flashpoint during his Willow Creek years—the ordained priesthood, versus the priesthood of all believers—and he finds the grace to embrace and defend the Catholic understanding.

I was puzzled, though, that as the book neared its end, Haw outlined those many things in contemporary Catholicism which he still dislikes:  an unsatisfying homily, an occasional boredom at Mass, the difficulty in stepping outside his comfort zone to fit into an unfamiliar rhythm.  He writes of a distrust which “has still not entirely left him.”  Why, I wondered—why, when he had traveled this far along the road toward a full appreciation of the Catholic faith—didn’t he suspend writing for another two months or two years, until he had made his peace with these other things, too?  For yes, there are times when human talents fail, when a homily is cobbled by the priest’s limited vocabulary and fails to ignite the congregation’s hearts with love and apostolic zeal.  Sometimes the liturgy becomes so commonplace that its beauty is overlooked.  But Haw is still on the road, and if he’s completed only 80% of his journey home, he might better have waited until these challenges, too, found their answer in the divine presence.

The popular evangelical preacher Dr. John MacArthur once told a story about two men who tried to jump toward heaven.  One, an average man, could jump only a few feet; while the other, a world champion pole vaulter, could leap four times higher.  From the vantage point of earth, the second man jumped much higher; but when examined against the scale of the universe, neither man’s insignificant leap could even reach the nearest star.

Perhaps Chris Haw could look at the Mass and at our Catholic prayer with a forgiving eye:  One homily is better constructed and more insightful than another, one church building is more skillfully designed to point the soul toward God; but like MacArthur’s earth-bound leapers, bound by gravity and still light years from the nearest celestial body, none approaches the greatness of God and the beauty of the heavenly liturgy.

*     *     *     *     *

 This review is part of the Patheos Book Club.

Men Must Endure Their Going Hence: Remembering C.S. Lewis

Men Must Endure Their Going Hence.

So warns Edgar in Shakespeare’s classic King Lear.

And so says the tombstone shared by illustrious Christian apologist Clive Staples Lewis and his brother Warren.  The tombstone, located in the yard of Holy Trinity Church in Headington Quarry, Oxford, commemorates the writer C.S. “Jack” Lewis, who died 48 years ago on November 23, 1963, and his quieter older brother who died in April 1973.

Lewis was one of the intellectual giants of the 20th century, contributing a wealth of literature ranging from children’s literature and fantasy (most popular being The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe and others in the Chronicles of Narnia series), to allegory, to literary criticism and popular theology.  During World War II, his reflections on his BBC radio broadcast—later republished as Mere Christianity—made the case for Christianity through the use of logic.

Despite Lewis’ prominence in Christian apologetics, he was not always a follower of Christ; during his university years, he was an avowed atheist.  At Oxford, he often debated philosophy and religion with several Christian friends including J.R.R. Tolkien (best known for the Lord of the Rings trilogy).  And those friends were persuasive!  “Really, a young Atheist cannot guard his faith too carefully,” Lewis confided in his conversion story, Surprised by Joy. “Dangers lie in wait for him on every side.”

Lewis wrote poignantly in Surprised by Joy about his first steps toward faith, toward confirming the existence of God:

“You must picture me alone in that room at Magdalen, night after night, feeling, whenever my mind lifted even for a second from my work, the steady, unrelenting approach of Him whom I so earnestly desired not to meet.  That which I greatly feared had at last come upon me. In the Trinity Term of 1929 I gave in, and admitted that God was God, and knelt and prayed: perhaps, that night, the most dejected and reluctant convert in all England.”

So Lewis embraced Christianity, albeit reluctantly.  But was Jesus real?  His interest piqued by the faith of friends who seemed too pragmatic to fall for a myth, Lewis read the Gospels—and he was amazed to find them believable.  The writers, he thought, were too unimaginative to have made the whole thing up; they seemed to truly believe the accounts of Jesus’ ministry, death and Resurrection.

Perhaps Lewis’ best known application of Aristotelian logic is his “Liar, Lunatic or Lord” syllogism.  Evaluating Jesus’ claims to be God, Lewis points to three possible explanations:  either he really was God, he was deliberately lying, or he was not God but thought himself to be (in other words, he was delusional or insane).  Nothing in the Gospel, according to Lewis, suggests that Jesus was not a person of truth; nor did he appear mentally impaired. The only logical answer, then, was that Jesus is truly what he said he was:  He is God.

On September 19, 1931, Jack Lewis engaged his friends Hugo Dyson and J.R.R. Tolkien in a discussion of myth.  The trio walked and talked all night:  Tolkien explaining how myths were God’s way of preparing the ground for the Christian story, and Dyson showing how Christianity worked for the believer, liberating him from sin and helping him to become a better person.  Lewis’ stubborn arguments for atheism were demolished.

It took days of ruminating and meditating for Lewis’ conversion to be complete.  Lewis himself explained that on November 12, he and his brother Warren traveled by motorcycle to Whipsnade Zoo.  “When we set out,” Lewis wrote, “I did not believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God; and when we reached the zoo, I did.” 

Lewis’ book The Pilgrim’s Regress tells the story of his dramatic conversion in allegorical form.