Part 3: Is the Trinity in the New Testament?
Christology developed in the early centuries of Christianity. Writing church fathers of the 2nd and 3rd centuries, called apologists, believed Jesus was God, but to a lesser extent than the Father was, and that Jesus’ divinity was derived from the Father. Also, they had no consensus about the constitution of the Holy Spirit.
But all of this changed during the 4th century. In 325, the Catholic Church’s first ecumenical council, held at Nicaea, officially declared Jesus was “fully God of fully God.” That is, Jesus was just as much God as the Father was. Yet the Church did not decide on the constitution of the Holy Spirit until its Council of Constantinople, in 381. There, the Catholic Church officially established the doctrine of the Trinity, with the Holy Spirit as a full-fledged Person. The official church doctrine of the Trinity to this day—which is embraced by Roman Catholics, Orthodox, and Protestants alike—is that God (=Godhead) is one essence consisting of three co-equal and co-eternal Persons: the Father, the Son (Jesus Christ), and the Holy Spirit.
(Thus, this doctrine of the Trinity did not even exist until the latter half of the 4th century. Many people, even Christians, err in asserting that the doctrine of the Trinity was established at the Nicene Council, in 325.)
These mainline churches have never officially departed from this dogma that God is three Persons, even insisting that people must believe in this doctrine to be genuine Christian believers, thus to be “saved.” The Nicene Creed pronounces a curse (“anathema”), and thereby condemns to hell, all people who do not adhere to its declaration that Jesus is fully God. And Presbyterian theologian A.A. Hodge, being an example of Protestants, asserts that “it is essential to salvation to believe in the three persons in one Godhead.” And all of these traditionalists contend that the Bible supports their doctrine of the Trinity.
On the contrary, not only doesn’t the Bible support this doctrine of the Trinity, the word “trinity” does not appear anywhere in the entire Bible, and therefore it is not in the New Testament.
Many distinguished Christian scholars now acknowledge that the doctrine of the Trinity is not biblical and thus does not represent the primitive Jesus movement. World-class Roman Catholic theologian Hans Kung asks concerning the Bible, “Why is there never talk of the ‘triune God’?… throughout the New Testament, while there is belief in God the Father, in Jesus the Son and in God’s Holy Spirit, there is no doctrine of one God in three persons … no doctrine of a ‘triune God,’ a ‘Trinity.’” Kung further observes, “If we wanted to judge Christians of the pre-Nicene period after the event, in the light of the Council of Nicaea, then not only the Jewish Christians would be heretics but also almost all the Greek church fathers.” Kung concludes, “The theology which became manifest at the [first six ecumenical] councils led to a considerable alienation from the New Testament.”
Trinitarian scholars cite the following New Testament (NT) texts to support their viewpoint: Matthew 28.19; Romans 15.30; 1 Corinthians 12.4-6; 2 Corinthians 13.14; Ephesians 2.18; 4.4, 6; 1 Peter 1.2; Jude 20-21. Yet most of these scholars admit that these texts only mention the Father, the Son, and the (Holy) Spirit without indicating that they are co-equal Persons. Furthermore, they are arranged in these texts in various orders, whereas most Trinitarians throughout history have characterized the Trinity as follows: the first member of the Trinity is the Father, the second member of the Trinity is the Son (Jesus Christ), and the third member of the Trinity is the Holy Spirit. But none of this in the Bible. Many Trinitarian scholars would agree with NT scholar and early form critic Vincent Taylor’s assessment that “the Trinity is not an express New Testament doctrine.”
Thus, many distinguished, Trinitarian scholars concede that their doctrine represents no more than a deduction from Scripture. J.N.D. Kelly says of the NT, “Explicit Trinitarian confessions are few and far between; where they do occur, little can be built upon them.” Johannes Schneider admits, “The NT does not contain the developed doctrine of the Trinity.” And D.A. Carson concedes, “Individually these texts do not prove there is any Trinitarian consciousness in the NT, since other threefold-phrases occur.”
Indeed, the NT has other triune formulas which mention angels instead of the Holy Spirit. For instance, Jesus spoke of the yet future time when “the Son of Man … comes in His glory, and the glory of the Father and of the holy angels” (Luke 9.26; cf. Matthew 16.27/Mark 8.38). He also said, “But of that day and/or hour no one knows, not even the angels of/in heaven, nor the Son, but the Father alone” (Matthew 24.36/Mark 13.32 NASB). And the Apostle Paul wrote, “I solemnly charge you in the presence of God and of Christ Jesus and of His chosen angels” (1 Timothy 5.21).
The primary philosophical argument against Trinitarianism is that it postulates an abstract, tri-personal Godhead that is contrary to nature. Therefore, this triune God is not even reckoned as a Person or (arguably) a Being. Trinitarian C.S. Lewis explains that “in Christianity God is … not even a person.” Indeed, and if Trinitarianism is true, man should consist of three persons because man was made in the image of God.
The primary logical arguments against Trinitarianism are that it is contradictory, confusing, and incomprehensible. It is contradictory in that Trinitarians profess to be monotheistic (one God) while insisting that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit have separate identities as Persons, each being God, yet they are not three Gods. When Daniel Webster (of dictionary fame) was asked how he could believe God was both numerically one and three, he replied somberly, “I do not question the arithmetic of heaven.”
Trinitarians readily admit that their doctrine of three being one is a paradox and a mystery. But most Jews and Muslims allege that it is tritheistic—the worship of three Gods–which Trinitarian Christians vehemently deny. And many of them irrationally admit to its incomprehensibility. If so, neither do they comprehend it nor its originators! Trinitarians retort that their doctrine merely seems contradictory.
Hans Kung, under the guise of recovering the traditional doctrine of the Trinity, attempts to redefine it as follows:
“I shall try to sum up in three sentences what seems to me to be the biblical nucleus of the traditional doctrine of the Trinity, in light of the New Testament, considered for today:
— To believe in God the Father means to believe in the one God, creator, preserver and perfecter of the world and humankind: Judaism, Christianity and Islam have this belief in one God in common.
— To believe in the Holy Spirit means to believe in God’s effective might and power in human beings and the world: Jews, Christian and Muslims also have this belief in God’s Spirit in common.
— To believe in the Son of God means to believe in the revelation of the one God in the man Jesus of Nazareth who is thus God’s Word, Image and Son.”
What we have here is a restitution of New Testament teaching, and I couldn’t have said it better myself.
(Author Kermit Zarley was a Trinitarian for twenty-two years before he undertook what he calls his “quest for the real Jesus.” It resulted in his 600-page book, The Restitution of Jesus Christ . Learn about it and purchase it at servetustheevangelical.com or kermitzarley.com.
(To see a titled list of over fifty, two-three page posts (easily accessible) about the Bible not saying Jesus is God, click here.)