Overinterpreting Alabama

Doug Jones won a “stunning” victory in the Alabama Senate race. It was a stinging “rebuke” to Trump.

Those were the headlines following the raucous Alabama Senate runoff on Tuesday.

Jones is the first Democratic Senator in Alabama for a quarter century, and the first Democrat elected in a state-wide vote for a long time. It’s a big moment in Alabama politics.

Is it also a big moment in American politics? A moderately important moment, to the extent that it shifts the balance in the Senate, and makes it that much easier for the Democrats to win a majority.

The election raises questions about Trump’s political judgment, threatens Trump’s agenda, and further exposes and exacerbates rifts between the Republican Establishment and socially conservative populists.

But I suspect that the headlines, like a lot of the commentary on the race, nationalized and therefore overinterpreted the race. Most of what happened can be understood within the frame of state politics and this very peculiar race.

During the Republican runoff, conservative politicos in Alabama (tepidly) supported the tainted Luther Strange because they were worried that Roy Moore couldn’t beat Doug Jones in a general election. That was long before there was any whiff of scandal around Moore. Moore barely won his last race to become the state’s Chief Justice.

Moore isn’t just a polarizing figure in America, or a polarizing figure in Alabama. He’s a polarizing figure in the Alabama GOP.

The accusations against Moore (that he made sexual advances to teenagers) hurt him in Bible belt Alabama. Some Republicans voted for Doug Jones because he seemed the moral candidate. (Reliable, informed friends tell me that Jones has been married three times, though that’s surprisingly difficult to confirm.)

Over 20,000 write-in votes were cast, almost exactly equal to Jones’s margin of victory. Arguably, the race was less a referendum on Trump than a referendum on decency.

Once the women came forward, the race was about that. It was hard to find any discussion of policy. Moore tried to turn the election into a referendum on abortion or gay marriage. It didn’t work. Moore refused to debate, and oddly spent a lot of time off the campaign trail.

Some Republican voters stayed home. Trump got 1.3 million Alabama votes in 2016; Moore got 650,000. Presidential races always attract a bigger crowd, but how many decided they couldn’t cast a vote for either candidate?

Some may have made a calculated political decision to vote Jones. Hi term is truncated. Republicans will have another shot at the seat in two years, and it’ll be easier to unseat a recently-elected Senator than keep a seat held by the rambunctious Moore.

One cannot discount the role of the media. I’m not a media basher, and I found the Washington Post report on Moore’s accusers credible (though doubtless politically motivated). But a lot of lies were told about Moore (e.g., that he molested 8 or more teenagers) and he was pilloried, as he has been for a long time, for bluntly stating views that are standard fare among conservative Christians.

Besides all that, the Senate threatened to put Moore through an ethics hearing, which would have kept the hubbub going for another two years. Perhaps Alabamians simply voted to get this horrid thing over and done.

This wasn’t the most important election in the history of the Republic. I’m skeptical that it signals much about the future of Trump or the overall direction of Alabama politics. And it’s a temporary divergence from Alabama redness. Most likely, Jones’s Senate seat will be back in Republican hands in  two years.

"This series was really lovely. Thank you!"

Proverbs 31 Woman, 3
"I wonder if there is something too about the fact that those physically in the ..."

Altar on the East
"Here's a good choice. Responsibly inform any patient with any predisposition to any condition of ..."

Secular Medicine
"Why drink water from a cistern that has already been used by others (v. 17)? ..."

Of Water and Cisterns

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • RustbeltRick

    Ah, the innuendo is rich here.

    “(Reliable, informed friends tell me that Jones has been married three times, though that’s surprisingly difficult to confirm.)”

    If it’s difficult to confirm, why bring it up, except to smear the man? Do a google search on “Doug Jones divorce” and nothing comes up. This is a pretty passive-aggressive way to start ridiculous, irresponsible rumors.

    “a lot of lies were told about Moore (e.g., that he molested 8 or more teenagers)”

    And of course, you don’t link to the source of that accusation. What is true is that 8 women came forward with accusations against Moore over past behavior.

    “he was pilloried, as he has been for a long time, for bluntly stating views that are standard fare among conservative Christians.”

    Roy Moore still believes Obama was born in Kenya. He insists Sharia Law is being practiced in the Midwest US (Indiana or Illinois, he couldn’t say for sure). Yes, that probably is standard fare in conservative land, but that’s pretty damning about conservatism as a whole. Thank God he lost.

    “I found the Washington Post report on Moore’s accusers credible (though doubtless politically motivated).”

    Please explain. Were the women playing political games, or the journalists, or what?

  • Cal P

    More importantly: does anyone remember Scott Brown’s game-changer election in MA, where a Republican took a solid Democratic senate seat (from the deceased Ted Kennedy no less)? Conservative pundits thought it was a rapid validation of how the Obama presidency was failing. Except it wasn’t, everyone moved on, Brown was a rather moderate Republican on many issues, he lost the next election, and moved to NH, and entrenched himself there until he got an ambassadorship. But, nope, it went down the memory hole.