The Sixth Sunday after the Epiphany – February 12, 2017
Deuteronomy 30:15-20, Psalm 119:1-8, I Corinthians 3:1-9, Matthew 5:21-37
Today’s scriptures speak of life and death, spiritually, emotionally, physically, and institutionally. Each moment is an opportunity for decision-making. Many paths are available, some leading to abundance and beauty, others to scarcity and ugliness. Our choices are not just for ourselves. They shape our relationship to God and the world beyond us, including our own future. They can contribute to greater and lesser embodiment of divine values in the world. Indirectly or directly, our decisions and the decisions of our leaders can lead to life and death for people across the globe and can shape the future of generations we will never meet, especially as our decisions relate to planetary well-being and climate change.
Deuteronomy poses the question in terms of two ways – life and death. While at first glance, the passage seems to support a linear acts-consequences approach to ethics and our relationship with God, the passage is much more nuanced. The immediate results of our actions do not necessarily lead to prosperity or punishment. But, over the long haul our decisions can have beneficial or disastrous effects on ourselves and others. In 21st century America, we often interpret this passage individualistically, and while our decisions shape our future possibilities as individuals, it is likely that these passages equally relate to institutional decision-making. Our governmental and business leaders can make significant contributions to the welfare or demise of the planet as we know it. Deuteronomy challenges governments and businesses to choose life, that is, to make decisions that promote the well-being of employees, clients, and the ecosystem. Prophets trump profits in God’s eyes, and our institutional success is measured by our positive contribution to future generations of humans and non-humans.
Psalm 119 asserts that happiness and joy result from our alignment with divine statutes. This is more than obedience to divine law in the narrow sense, but a commitment to being God’s partner in healing and beautifying creation. Happiness comes from world loyalty, from looking beyond self-interest and aggrandizement to care for the wider world.
Paul’s words from I Corinthians invite us to go beyond partisan politics, ideologies, theologies, and ecclesiologies. There are many paths to divine truth, yet all healthy paths aim at unity amid diversity. The pathways of truth – here described in terms of followers of Apollos or Paul – are intended to complement and enrich one another. While each path has a unique perspective, as a whole the many paths lead to Christ. Accordingly, we need to see our path as relative and partial, and positively related to other healthy spiritual paths.
Jesus words from the Sermon on the Mouth describe spiritually-healthy relationships. Spiritually-healthy relationships lead to life abundant. They are grounded in the healing of inner life reflected in positive and life-supporting relationships. Spiritual transformation is a matter of mindfulness or self-awareness in which we creatively respond to our emotional lives and past traumatic experiences so that we will not inflict our pain on others. Self-awareness involves a regular moral and spiritual inventory to determine where we have hurt others and to discern ways we can move from alienation to reconciliation.
Jesus’ words on divorce and adultery seem anachronous today. They seem inflexible and condemnatory in a culture in which between 40-50% of marriages end in divorce and that will be true in the congregations who will hear this scripture. Like the strictures against homosexuality, these passages must be nuanced and cannot be understood as damning those who divorce and remarry, including many who will preach on this text. It is clear that divorce often results from and eventuates in some form of alienation, but that doesn’t necessarily make all divorces evil. Some are necessary as a matter of spiritual, emotional, or physical self-preservation. Moreover, while divorce has economic consequences, especially for women, the impact of divorce is no longer catastrophic economically for every couple. Perhaps the text is a reminder that grace is essential for relational well-being. If our relationship does not survive, we are not condemned by God, but given the opportunity to find healing and new life. Divorce isn’t optimal in most situations, and it may be God-blessed or, to use Whitehead’s phrase, “the best for that impasse.” Choosing life for ourselves and our children may mean leaving certain dysfunctional or abusive marriage. While such choices are often painful, they may be part of the healing process for ourselves and those we love. Regardless, God is with us, providing us with new possibilities of creative transformation, for us and the world.
The scriptures counsel us to choose life, individually and corporately. What does it mean for you to choose life in your marriage…in your congregation…in your community…and for the planet? What will you need to sacrifice to go beyond self-interest to world-loyalty in an interdependent world? What does it mean for us, as Mother Teresa counsels, to do something beautiful for God?
Bruce G. Epperly is Pastor and Teacher at South Congregational Church, Centerville, MA. He is the author of forty books including The Gospel According to Winnie the Pooh, A Center in the Cyclone: Twenty-first Century Clergy Self-care, Tending to the Holy: The Practice of the Presence of God in Ministry, and Process Theology: Embracing Adventure with God. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org