Rest for the Go-Between

Brian Gee received an M.A. in Biblical Exegesis from Wheaton College. When he’s not working, Brian enjoys writing from his own experiences at the intersection of faith and sexuality. Originally from southern California, he lives in Chicago’s western suburbs with his wife and two kids. You can check out more about Brian, or get in contact with him, at http://briangee.me.

I was not planning on spending this week flat on my back and 2,000 miles from home. But thanks to a back injury I sustained while travelling for work, I’ve had ample time to contemplate each crevice of the spackled ceiling above me. Of course, it’s been inconvenient (and painful), but my forced convalescence has given me some rare time to reflect on the noise and tension that comes with living between the Christian and LGBT communities.

I trade in the currency of ideas. During the day, I develop product taglines, advertisements, positioning copy, and materials used to transmit ideas about products. Outside of work, I spend time reading, writing, and developing ideas that focus on reconciliation between the conservative church and the LGBT Christian community. As a quick glance through my Twitter feed reveals, I spend a good amount of time reading and interacting with people on both sides of the ideological divide called sexuality – Christian or otherwise.

Of course, the division is deep. Nowhere is this dissonance more evident than in the world of social media. Every day, there’s a new scandal, a new controversy, a new accusation or revelation or triumph that pops-up as a breaking headline from one side or the other. Someone says something shocking. Within an hour or two, responses are flying from all sides. The world is suspended in its orbit until all sides have had their last word. Sometimes a story lasts for a week; some stories last less than a day. But a year from now, almost none will be remembered.

It’s not that these conflicts are not important. Though we may not remember any specific exchange, each day’s stories slowly move the cultural needle one way or the other. But as I sat in my silent bedroom staring at my silent computer’s noisy Twitter feed, I started to feel the weight of living at the crux of two worlds. The weight that betrays a hidden truth: that each exchange is not simply about an issue. Each argument is personal.

The arguments I see everyday from the Christian community and the LGBT community feel very much like a slow divorce. Each side has its reasons for arguing with the other. Both have legitimate grievances that have brought them to this place of separation. The two sides debate ideologies, and they do so publicly with the hope that others will be swayed to their side. It’s a form of public discourse, and while it’s not pleasant, it does lead to change.

But for those reading, the arguments are not mere ideas; the ideas are people’s lives. Those who identify with only one of the two sides won’t necessarily feel a strain, as they side with the one over the other. Instead, it is those who live with one foot in the each world that are like the child in a divorce. They know and love both sides, because each party represents a part of who they are. But they have to live daily with the reality that the one side whom they love wants to tear apart the other side, whom they also love.

The arguments may be necessary, but the effects of the cognitive dissonance can be difficult to process. The irreconcilability of the opposing views becomes exhausting and discouraging. Like warring parents, each side strives to show why the other is unworthy of trust. Throw in the pressure to maintain website traffic through new controversy (even in the name of truth), and you’ve got a recipe that creates echo chambers for those on either side, and a fury of incompatible noise for those living in the middle.

Whether we who live in the middle realize it or not (and, from talks with several friends, I think we do), each article we read, each response we write, and each interaction we have takes an almost imperceptible toll on our emotional well-being. Each of us can handle a certain amount of this stress. But the accessibility of social media and the immediacy of the Twitter news cycle has trained us to see every argument as urgent and every dispute as important. In the rush to meet point for point, we sometimes forget that we have emotional limits. While the opponent (whoever it may be at the moment) deals in argument, we absorb the emotional impact of the fight, because we are always to some degree fighting against a part of ourselves.

We can not escape this debate, nor should be try to bow out of it until it’s over. Each of us has a voice, and we should use it at appropriate times. But this forced convalescence has shown me an essential key for surviving the middle road: rest.

The injury to my back was not caused by a single move. It was the result of a series of small events where I pushed myself too hard. The morning it happened, I had worked out. That afternoon, I carried two heavy shoulder bags through an hour-long line at Midway Airport. Then I sat on a plane for four hours as my back began to seize up. None of these three events in isolation would have caused enough stress to snap my back. But in sequence, and with no rest, it was enough stress to lay me out for over a week.

In much the same way, we check our social feeds daily without thinking much about it. We donate some mental and emotional energy multiple times a day to the articles on faith and sexuality that mean so much to us. We pay close attention to who is calling out whom because of something he/she said. None of this is wrong.

But how much of it is necessary? How urgent really is this latest bit of news? How incensed should I be at this leader today? If we want to continue the difficult work of bringing reconciliation in the midst of a great divorce, we need to make sure we give ourselves permission to take breaks from the noise of the great debate.

As stewards of finite bodies, we must choose carefully where we invest our finite emotional and mental resources. By centering our focus on the issues and arguments that matter most, we can preserve ourselves from the cognitive and emotional burnout that comes from reacting too fast, too often. Then, we can take that energy and pour it into one another. We can use it to offer support when the critics come knocking or our souls feel diminished. By limiting our investment in the noise of others, we can stand between opposing sides, waving the banner of love, hope, peace, patience, reconciliation, and forgiveness, and therein be the hands and feet (and back!) of God.

 Much love.
.
Print Friendly

About Andrew Marin

Andrew Marin is President and Founder of The Marin Foundation (www.themarinfoundation.org). He is author of the award winning book Love Is an Orientation (2009), its interactive DVD curriculum (2011), and recently an academic ebook titled Our Last Option: How a New Approach to Civility can Save the Public Square (2013). Andrew is a regular contributor to a variety of media outlets and frequently lectures at universities around the world. Since 2010 Andrew has been asked by the United Nations to advise their various agencies on issues of bridging opposing worldviews, civic engagement, and theological aspects of reconciliation. For twelve years he lived in the LGBT Boystown neighborhood of Chicago, and is currently based St. Andrews, Scotland, where he is teaching and researching at the University of St. Andrews earning his PhD in Constructive Theology with a focus on the Theology of Culture. Andrew's research centers on the cultural, political, and religious dynamics of reconciliation. Andrew is married to Brenda, and you can find him elsewhere on Twitter (@Andrew_Marin), Facebook (AndrewMarin01), and Instagram (@andrewmarin1).

  • pmview

    Our social disconnection seems more akin to an analogy of foster-children that have become overlooked in an emotional maze of institutional conflicts which is forcing them to use their survival-instincts at a base level. Our legitimate need for loving attachments to a community, and a feeling of belonging, is quite personal and starts its journey with the foundational ability to engender trust within a safe relationship. GLBT seek out this acceptance with the hope for an honest, open and recognizable acknowledgment. The Marin Foundation works to provide this honest dialogue via Living In The Tension sessions, the LIAO book and DVD plus seminars which brings together those who want constructive resolutions without hating the “Other.” No one should shoulder their own pain, their deepest feelings of affective abandonment in isolation but have an opportunity to find love and acceptance for who they are inside, within a safe place to express themselves without judgmentalism, stigmatism and cruel ruthlessness. Otherwise, a person suffers in a detached manner and deals with a life filled with unpredictable disturbances that disrupt their own sense of wellness due to oppositional stress. These are the after-effects found within a wide spectrum of our current dissociative social world that seems to take advantage of those who are struggling to find community and a home, thereby perpetuating the on-going rifts between opposing sides.


CLOSE | X

HIDE | X