Good News for Movie, Tech, Culture, and/or Apple Fans! Sorkin to Write Jobs Movie

If you’re a movie buff, or if you are fascinated by technology, or if you’re an observer of culture, or if you like Apple, then there is good news. Aaron Sorkin has signed on to write the move version of Walter Isaacson’s biography of Steve Jobs. This story has shown up in most major news outlets, including the New York Times.

Jobs and Sorkin. A little Photoshop goes a long way. Giveaway? No black turtleneck for Jobs.

Why do I say this is good news? First of all, because I believe Steve Jobs, whatever you think of him and his products, is an icon of our age. The movie version of his life needs to be well done, and a script by Sorkin is a solid foundation for an excellent movie. Sorkin has written such excellent works as: A Few Good Men, The Social Network, Moneyball, and The West Wing. Sorkin has a particular gift portraying quirky, brilliant characters . . . like Steve Jobs.

Second, I found Isaacson’s biography to be quite fine: well-written, engaging, fair, honest. The movie version of Jobs life needs to be similarly well done. It should capture the nuances of this very odd, fun, amazing, creative, narcissistic, passionate, cruel, visionary man. Sorkin is up to the job, I believe.

So, way to go Sony Pictures for signing Sorkin. (Does it strike any of you as ironic that Sony is doing the biopic of Jobs? That’s a little like having the Romney people do a movie on Obama’s life.) And, way to go Aaron Sorkin, for taking on this task. You’ll do a great job.

What Would You Do If You Got Superpowers? Green Lantern vs. Chronicle

Like father, like son, except Nathan's Superman suit was way better than mine.

When I was a young boy, I yearned for super powers. After watching The Adventures of Superman on TV, starring George Reeves as the Man of Steel, I would put on my t-shirt with a big ‘S’ on the front, tie a towel around my neck as a cape, and make every effort to fly around the house. On more than one occasion, I actually prayed and asked God to give me super powers. I promised to use them to help people. But, mostly, I just wanted to fly. Thankfully, I did not have the privilege of watching shows like Jackass, which might have encouraged me to try flying off the roof. No, I was stuck with my mortal powers . . . still am, as a matter of fact.

But, I wonder what I would do if I got superpowers. What if I could fly? What if I could leap tall buildings in a single bound? What if I could crawl up walls like a spider or stretch myself as if made of miraculous rubber? What would I do? What would I be?

According to the recent spate of superhero movies, chances are I would become a paragon of virtue, wisdom, and courage. I would be willing to sacrifice my life to save others. And this would be true, regardless of how self-centered and amoral I had been before my miraculous transformation.

Consider the case of the Green Lantern in the recent movie called, sensibly enough, Green Lantern. I won’t be spoiling much by telling you that this movie tells the story of Hal Jordan, a self-centered and obnoxious fighter pilot who is chosen by a magic ring to become a Green Lantern, a guardian of justice and harmony in the universe. Right before our very eyes, a man who might best be described as a jerk becomes a virtuous, wise, selfless hero who is willing to die for the sake of others. Yet, the movie gives us very little reason to believe that this should have happened. It seems more plausible to believe that a man was endowed with astronomical superpowers than that he instantly changed his entire character and value system. My son, the one of boyhood Superman fame, warned me that Green Lantern wasn’t a good film. I should have heeded his warning.

Some movies try to provide a rationale for their superhero’s exemplary character. Spider-Man, for example, tells the story of a young man who was raised in a loving, moral family. When, after receiving his arachnid-like powers, he uses them for selfish purposes, he pays a high price in the death of his beloved uncle, a death he could have prevented with less self-absorption. Plus, Uncle Ben left Peter Parker AKA Spider-Man with sage advice, “Remember, with great power. comes great responsibility.”

The 2011 film, Captain America, tries in a different way to explain the moral fiber of its superhero. In this case, Steve Rogers, who becomes Captain America through he wonders of science, is chosen precisely because of his ethical standards. He is courageous, with a strong sense of justice, and a lack of desire to kill people, even the bad guys. Thus, the willingness of Captain America to give up his own life for others makes sense.

The recent movie, Chronicle, tells a different story altogether. When three high-school aged boys gain superpowers, at first they continue to be more or less the same boys. Their personalities don’t change. Nor do their values. They do not envision using their powers to help others. Rather, they simply want to enjoy their superhuman endowments and, if possible, become more popular with their peers, especially girls. But in one of the boys, the one whose family is painfully dysfunctional, superpowers simply magnify his own moral confusion. He is not miraculously transformed into a superhuman do-gooder. Rather, he becomes dangerous, a genuine mortal threat.

I will not offer up any more spoilers here. Chronicle is a fascinating, thought-provoking, and entertaining film. I’d recommend it unless you’re squeamish about PG-13 violence. But, even given how little I’ve said, you can see how Chronicle offers an unusual and unusually thoughtful answer to the question: What would you do if you got superpowers? After rolling my eyes at the saccharine answer of Green Lantern, I found the blunt realism of Chronicle to be refreshing.

Let me close with a couple of thoughts on moral development and superheros.

First, I believe that superpowers accentuate our virtues and exacerbate our faults. If a person like Hal Jordan were actually given magical Green Lantern powers, I expect he’d use them for selfish benefit. Why would we expect anything different? You see this sort of thing all the time. People who suddenly receive great amounts of money, power, or fame generally become what they already are, only bigger (which could mean better and could mean worse).

Second, as a Christian, I believe that we actually receive superpowers when we come into relationship with God through Christ. The Holy Spirit of God resides within us to empower us for supernatural ministry. Yet the Spirit of God is not just a value-neutral power source. The Spirit also teaches us the ways of God and molds in us the character of God. Thus, our power comes not as an impersonal force, but rather in relationship with the very Spirit of God.

Cultivating Contentment: A Response to Enough by Adam Hamilton

Do you have enough? Are you always striving for more? What might truly satisfy you? Will you ever be content?

These questions are addressed in a fine book called Enough: Discovering Joy Through Simplicity and Generosity (Abingdon, 2009/12). It was written by Adam Hamilton, senior pastor of the United Methodist Church of the Resurrection in Leawood, Kansas. This outstanding church, the largest in the United Methodist denomination, reflects the giftedness and wisdom of Hamilton, the church’s founder and teaching pastor. Whether in person or in writing, Hamilton communicates clearly, engagingly, and humbly. He bases his ideas squarely on careful biblical interpretation, but makes multiple connections to the issues and challenges of people today. As I read Enough, I found myself quickly willing to trust Hamilton as a spiritual friend and guide. This is a solid, book. Plus, it’s not overly long, which means it does not waste your time. As a writer, Hamilton gives us just “enough.” (Sorry!)

One of the chapters that I found most encouraging and challenging is called “Cultivating Contentment.” Let we warn you, however, that in my printing of the book, there is an unfortunate typo. The chapter heading for chapter 3 in the table of contents rightly reads “Cultivating Contentment,” which is the point of the whole chapter. But the text of the book mistakenly uses the title “Cultivating Commitment.” I note this so you won’t be confused if you try to find the chapter with which I want to interact. (This is, by the way, a publisher’s nightmare.)

Hamilton’s point in chapter 3 is that we need to cultivate contentment in our lives. Discontent, rampant in our culture today, drives us to live harried and hollow lives, as we strive to fill our souls with stuff that cannot satisfy.

As I worked my way through the chapter, I thought to myself, “But, wait, some kinds of discontent are good. Sometimes contentment is actually bad.” I wondered if Hamilton would make the distinctions that are needed when we talk about contentment. Sure enough, he does. He quotes the philosopher James Mackintosh, “It is right to be contented with what we have, but never with what we are” (p. 71). Hamilton elaborates: “In other words, it is a positive motivator to be discontent with our moral character, our spiritual life, our pursuit of holiness, our desire for justice, and our ability to love” (p. 71). Indeed. There is much in our personal lives and in our world about which we should not be content. Yet, we are too often content with our sinfulness and with social injustice and poverty, while being discontent because we don’t have all the stuff we’d like to have for ourselves. This kind of discontent drives us to miss life’s delights as we struggle and strive to possess that which will not truly satisfy our souls.

Hamilton offers four keys to contentment:

1. Remember that it could be worse.

He admittedly borrows this one from John Ortberg. I get the point, but wish Hamilton had offered something more of substance here. I began to worry that the book was going to turn into a pop self-help book, rather than biblically-based teaching on contentment.

2. Ask yourself, “How long with this make me happy?”

Again, there is wisdom here, but more of the Ben Franklin variety. Hamilton does support this point with a personal example in which he bought a PlayStation2 that gave him only momentary pleasure. One of the strength’s of Enough is Hamilton’s willingness to share his foibles as well as his successes.

3. Develop a grateful heart.

Indeed. Solid biblical counsel here. More about gratitude later in the book. Hamilton is back on track.

4. Ask yourself, “Where does my soul find true satisfaction?”

This key to content receives the longest treatment of the four, and rightly so. This is Hamilton at his best, drawing from Scripture to teach us that true satisfaction is to be found in God alone. He writes, “The only real satisfaction of our souls is Jesus Christ. We can be content because we know Christ is by our side no matter what we’re talking through” (p. 84).

There is more of value in chapter 3. Next, Hamilton explains “Five Steps for Simplifying Your Life.” These are well-worth consideration. In fact, I think I’ll blog on them down the road a piece. But, for now, I want to close by reflecting for a moment on Hamilton’s question: “Where does my soul find true satisfaction?”

It would be so easy for Christians like me to say, “In God” or “In Christ alone.” We know this is the “right” answer. And so we’re inclined to shout it out like a kid in a children’s sermon. But I have to wonder, am I truly content in Christ? Do I find so much meaning, love, and satiation in him that I can say I am content and would be no matter the circumstances of my life? Could I truly say with the Apostle Paul, “I have learned how to be content in any circumstance. I know the experience of being in need and of having more than enough; I have learned the secret to being content in any and every circumstance, whether full or hungry or whether having plenty or being poor. I can endure all these things through the power of the one who gives me strength” (Philippians 4:11-13).

I don’t think I could say that, honestly. Yet, I wonder, what does it mean to be content in Christ? Does this mean I have no other yearnings at all? Does this mean I would be completely fulfilled if I were a hermit sitting in a cave meditating on Christ all day long? I’m going to think about this and get back to you later. I’d love to hear your thoughts on this.

Let me conclude this post by saying that I appreciate Adam Hamilton for raising issues I really need to think about. Perhaps you do too. If so, I highly recommend Enough.

Fascinating Conversations on Faith, Politics, and Culture

Looking for a serious yet available discussion of Mormonism and politics? Wondering about the current state of the religion vs. science debate? Curious about how the religious world looks from the perspective of an expert in the sociology of religion?

If you answered “yes” to any of these questions, then let me point you to an excellent set of resources. The transcripts from the latest Faith Angle Forum and now available online, at not cost.

The transcripts from the latest Faith Angle Forum are now available. This forum, sponsored by the Ethics and Public Policy Center in Washington DC and hosted by Michael Cromartie, brings together leading scholars and journalists. The topics are always timely, the discussion lively. Here are the topics from November’s Faith Angle Forum

Mormonism and Politics: Historical and Contemporary Issues

Lecture by David Campbell, Professor of Political Science, University of Notre Dame. Campbell is a top scholar of religion in America. He is also a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, by the way.

Dr. Peter Berger at the Faith Angle Forum

Six Decades as a Worldwide Religion Watcher: Observations and Lessons Learned

Lecture by Dr. Peter Berger, University Professor of Sociology, Emeritus, Boston University. Berger is one of the most influential and highly-regarded sociologists in the world today. He is a member of the Lutheran church.

Current Controversies in the Religion and Science Debates

Lecture by Dr. Ard Louis, Reader in Theoretical Physics at the University of Oxford. Louis is a physicist who specializes in the relationship between theoretical physics and biology. He is also an orthodox Christian.

Many thanks to Michael Cromartie and the Ethics and Public Policy Center for making these transcripts available.