Everybody on both sides of the gay “marriage” debate…

Everybody on both sides of the gay “marriage” debate… May 30, 2012

…appeals to “nature”. Opponents argue that homosex is unnatural. Advocates argue that any urge we feel is “natural” by virtue of its being felt.

Zac Alstin asks, “What do you mean by ‘natural’?”

"She asked the FBI to investigate. People who have nothing to hide don't fear an ..."

Sexual Abuse Whiplash
"Now that is a very good thing to say. There is hope for you James. ..."

Why the Old Prolife Movement Keeps ..."
"I don't think guys who did questionable things in the 80s as teens --do themselves, ..."

Sexual Abuse Whiplash
"The AP story that came out on Francis and an Argentina case is very disturbing ..."

Sexual Abuse Whiplash

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • What do we mean by ‘is’? What do we mean by ‘mean’? The list could go on and on. This is quite enjoyable.

  • ivan_the_mad

    Thanks for the post, it was a fun read. I enjoy expositions of Eastern thought. Highly relevant, too – the naturalistic fallacy is all too common these days (how very many times in college I tried to disabuse acquaintances of the notion that smoking pot is good because it’s “natural”).

  • I’ve been wondering when this point was going to be made. Homosexual activists have been wanting to have their Natural Law cake and eat it, too.

  • Mark S (not for Shea)

    When someone cuts in front of me in the concession line at the movie, it is part of basic nature to want to smash their face into the candy counter. When someone is rude to my wife in the grocery store, it is quite natural to want to pelt them with tomatoes.

    Just because a feeling is natural doesn’t necessarily make it right. Primal urges do not define morality.

    The whole nature vs. nurture debate is fascinating and fun. But ultimately, it’s all moot.