It’s About Damn Time Bill Clinton was Called to Account

as the sexual assailant he is, says The Atlantic

Yes, it is.  And the feminists and party hacks who prostituted themselves to defend him:

The notorious 1998 New York Times op-ed by Gloria Steinem must surely stand as one of the most regretted public actions of her life. It slut-shamed, victim-blamed, and age-shamed; it urged compassion for and gratitude to the man the women accused. Moreover (never write an op-ed in a hurry; you’ll accidentally say what you really believe), it characterized contemporary feminism as a weaponized auxiliary of the Democratic Party.

Called “Feminists and the Clinton Question,” it was written in March of 1998, when Paula Jones’s harassment claim was working its way through court. It was printed seven days after Kathleen Willey’s blockbuster 60 Minutes interview with Ed Bradley. If all the various allegations were true, wrote Steinem, Bill Clinton was “a candidate for sex addiction therapy.” To her mind, the most “credible” accusations were those of Willey, whom she noted was “old enough to be Monica Lewinsky’s mother.” And then she wrote the fatal sentences that invalidated the new understanding of workplace sexual harassment as a moral and legal wrong: “Even if the allegations are true, the President is not guilty of sexual harassment. He is accused of having made a gross, dumb, and reckless pass at a supporter during a low point in her life. She pushed him away, she said, and it never happened again. In other words, President Clinton took ‘no’ for an answer.”

When more than a dozen women stepped forward and accused Leon Wieseltier of a serial and decades-long pattern of workplace sexual harassment, he said, “I will not waste this reckoning.” It was textbook Wieseltier: the insincere promise and the perfectly chosen word. The Democratic Party needs to make its own reckoning of the way it protected Bill Clinton. The party needs to come to terms with the fact that it was so enraptured by their brilliant, Big Dog president and his stunning string of progressive accomplishments that it abandoned some of its central principles. The party was on the wrong side of history and there are consequences for that. Yet expedience is not the only reason to make this public accounting. If it is possible for politics and moral behavior to coexist, then this grave wrong needs to be acknowledged. If Weinstein and Mark Halperin and Louis C.K. and all the rest can be held accountable, so can our former president and so can his party, which so many Americans so desperately need to rise again.

Some of us have never forgotten, “You better get some ice on that.”

I believe Juanita Broaddrick.

Dems:  If you are serious about opposing our Sex Predator-in-Chief and Roy Moore, then step up say what you should have said 20 years ago or you are continuing to re-victimize every one of Clinton’s prey.  You knew it was wrong when it happened.

Do the right thing at long last.

"You bots are pretty sophisticated, yet still dumb. Gotta up the algorithms and data mining ..."

Simcha Fisher on the Weirdness at ..."
"When you make clear that you literally have not read a word of what you ..."

Simcha Fisher on the Weirdness at ..."
"Better watch that jerking knee on behalf of your child molester."

Simcha Fisher on the Weirdness at ..."
"I know one guy at work who identifies himself as a Libertarian and likes some ..."

Pope Francis warns of Libertarianism

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment