Why worship without justice dishonors God (Isaiah 1:10-20)

Isaiah 1:10-20 is a sobering prophetic passage in which God reams out the Israelites for thinking that they can honor Him while mistreating the most vulnerable of His people. We play the same game the ancient Israelites did. So many Christians today abstract their vertical relationship with God from their horizontal relationships with their neighbors and even pit the vertical against the horizontal. This is why I’m very suspicious of people who make a big fuss over glorifying God in the abstract as an act of zealous piety without exhibiting the generosity and mercy towards others that shows their genuine deliverance from the self-justification that Adam brought into the world. The abstraction of God from the creation He loves is the root of a particular immorality that afflicts God’s most zealous cheerleaders.

It’s important to point out that the injustice which offends God in this passage is not active abuse but neglect — the failure to “seek justice” by “relieving the oppressed, vindicating the orphan, [and] pleading for the widow” (Isaiah 1:17). These are not things that fall under justice according to the iustitia of blind-folds and scales that Western civilization inherited from the Roman Empire. Nobody broke any laws or showed favoritism. But the Biblical justice of משפט (mishpat) is not impartial; it is rather maximally partial to the welfare of each individual. God is saying that our Western bourgeois morality of staying out of other people’s space and keeping ourselves from posing a burden to others is inadequate and is in fact an utter failure of our humanity when we use it to justify our lack of compassion as many Christians today do.

The Bible recognizes in a way that our Greco-Roman juridical ethos doesn’t that injustice happens even when no one person can be “legitimately” held responsible. When society is structured in a way that people are impoverished and disempowered, sin has occurred even if no single individual can be blamed. Latin American theologian Jon Sobrino talks about the need for Jesus’ cross to accomplish the “perdón de la realidad” (the forgiveness of and deliverance from sins without identifiable agents). A lot of sin happens in our world right now through abstraction, when the decisions that harm others are separated by enough degrees of causation that the decision-maker can genuinely profess ignorance. This is often caused by utilitarianism, when we settle for what is beneficial to the majority rather than advocating for the one sheep out of one hundred who will be hurt.

I understand that decision-makers would never get anything done if they waited until they came up with the perfect system that would maximize benefit to all people. But Isaiah makes it pretty explicit that we “have blood on our hands” (v. 15) if we are not “relieving the oppressed, vindicating the orphan, and pleading for the widow.” What might seem like a radical, unreasonable standard for justice on the part of Isaiah is corroborated by Jesus whose most vivid accounts of damnation come in parables about people privilege neglecting (and not actively abusing) the oppressed: the rich man who ignores Lazarus in Luke 16:19-31 and the goats who never love Christ in “the least of these” in Matthew 25. We have acclimated to an account of justice in which “charity” is a bonus, when what God has to say in Isaiah 1 is that we are mocking Him to sing “Worthy is the lamb” if it does not compel us to seek out the welfare of those who are being crucified today.

God does not need our bulls or incense. He does not need our testimony of how much He has blessed us or our thunderous shouts of “God is good!” He does not need us to raise our hands and close our eyes when we praise Him. We need to do these things insofar as they transform us into vessels and vassals of God’s mercy, which is not something held in dialectic tension with God’s justice, but is rather the means by which He accomplishes justice. חסד (hesed), the Hebrew word for mercy, means mercy because it refers to the fiercely loyal steadfast love you have for your innermost family. The ethos of “family values” is completely misguided if it serves as the justification of keeping your חסד inside your white picket fence. We do have a special responsibility to our nuclear family as an inner sphere of more intense discipleship (ecclesiola) in which our goal is to make our sons and daughters people of mercy who accomplish God’s justice.

When God’s חסד reigns over people, they treat everyone as a brother or sister whom it is their problem to advocate for. This is where צדק (zedek), or covenantal righteousness, comes in. Jesus shows us צדק through His willingness to redeem our failed covenant with God trough His cross. People who have been gifted with this צדק through the justifying blood of Christ take up their crosses and make other people’s suffering their problem. They do not see it as less than a duty to plead for the widow and relieve the oppressed even though this duty does not justify us before God but simply shows that what He has done for us compels us to show the world through our חסד and משפט that He is worthy of our constant worship.

There are many real-world applications of this. The one closest to my heart is the fate of Medicaid in the fiscal cliff negotiations. I know kids who will get hurt if Medicaid gets cut. It seems like a lot of people speak presumptuously about this issue in the abstract, saying things like “America just needs to tighten its belt” or that it’s “immoral” to give poor people health care because it will create debt for our grandchildren (since raising taxes  any higher than the lowest level they’ve been in many decades isn’t an option?). Medicaid does not create dependency by providing poor kids with vaccines and braces; it just means that they are given an equal opportunity to make it. I realize that other ways of thinking about this issue are legitimate; just be careful about engaging in abstract oversimplifications and false analogies. There is no question that inefficiency needs to be cut from our government and that the budget needs to be balanced but there’s more than one way to do this. I don’t know what the exact solution is, but God says pretty plainly that He will not listen to our prayers if we neglect the oppressed, the widows, and the orphans.

About Morgan Guyton

I’m the director of the NOLA Wesley Foundation, which is the United Methodist campus ministry at Tulane and Loyola University in New Orleans, LA.

  • http://derekzrishmawy.wordpress.com Derek Rishmawy

    Morgan,
    I love this blog but the weak-spot for me comes in your last paragraph, where we touch down on the practical. I think someone can go ahead and affirm everything you just wrote, but maybe disagree on whether or not a particular tax cut or policy should be adhered to. They might just legitimately think that certain tax increases will lead to small businesses failing, or more people getting laid off and actually needing Medicaid who didn’t before. Or they might think that the better solution is the church stepping up their game in terms of giving, time spent, etc. I dunno, I’m not a policy expert either, so I’m just spit-balling here. Of course, there’s probably some third way like keep the tax cuts and Medicaid and cutting something else more. I’ll just say that where I’m coming from, I do know of small businesses, not billionaires and millionaires, who this is going to hit and affect, which then hits middle-class and lower employees.
    Overall though, yes.

    • Morgan Guyton

      Maybe there’s a different way to say what I did that acknowledges the legitimacy of different practical conclusions. I just feel like I’m supposed to speak up for the poor kids God gave me to love. I realize I don’t know the ins and outs, but it hurts my heart to hear people making abstract analogies to describe situations of which they’re mostly ignorant in which people I know and care about will get hurt. Nobody else really cares about them. The Democrats certainly don’t any more than Republicans care about evangelicals. Abstraction is the enemy. Many of the people who rail against “welfare mamas” would be compassionate if someone in need were a member of their community.

      • http://derekzrishmawy.wordpress.com Derek Rishmawy

        Sure. I think he is calling you to speak for them too. I think maybe it’s calling out for a both/and. Challenging government to shift priorities, or individuals/churches to shift theirs. Making sure that people who rail against the government do what they say it shouldn’t, and people who think that government help excuses them from personal compassion.

        • Morgan Guyton

          Oh believe me, I’m no less frustrated with those who think they’ve done all they need to do by voting for the party that pretends to care about the poor.

  • http://eurobrat.wordpress.com eurobrat

    Thank you for this. It always amazes me when people profess to believe in Jesus and his teachings, and yet don’t wish for society to be structured according to them, preferring the world to be a reflection of pure Darwinism.


CLOSE | X

HIDE | X