Not many Christian preachers get featured in The New Yorker or have full-length biographies written about them, but Rob Bell is unique. His remarkable contributions have earned him this kind of respect and attention, one which has author James K. Wellman Jr. asking “in what ways [Bell] is a harbinger — a representative of what is coming in the future of American Christian faith.”
If you are fascinated by trends in religion and or by Bell in particular, Wellman’s new book Rob Bell and a New American Christianity will be an easy and intriguing read. I find myself being one of those caught up in wonder at Bell’s stellar success and the implications of his work and theological journey. (The only point in the book that I really felt bogged down was when Wellman quoted Kevin DeYoung’s critique of Love Wins at length. Enough of that, already!)
“As a scholar of American religion, I believe that the decline and even the end of the Protestant establishment is an inevitable outcome of our religious history. … The center of American Christianity no longer holds, if it ever did. Is Bell’s work and person catalyzing a new kind of American Christianity? And what are the contours of this new form?”
In seven elegant chapters, Wellman tells Bell’s story, from his original mission statement (“Disciples who make disciples, who make disciples, who make disciples, who make disciples …”) to “the Don Golden years” of translating liberation theology for white evangelical suburbanites (which really should’ve been Bell’s “Farewell” moment) to his later years focused on “the personal journey of creativity and self-discovery.”
My main interests in this book are the development of Bell’s theology about church and mission, as well as the numerous quotes from author interviews with Bell, which have not been shared anywhere else before now. For instance, Bell tells Wellman, “The way that you witness in the world is you do what you do to the very best of our ability with integrity and honesty and excellence.”
That’s classic 2012 Rob Bell. That was not always Bell’s missional theology. Even from earlier days until his time at Mars Hill Bible Church in Grand Rapids came to an end, Bell was proclaiming “the church is the mission,” which, to my ears sounds like the old paradigm of mission thinking. But for Bell it means, “What if instead of the church having a mission, what if the church was the mission — its very organizational heart served the poor, helped the needy, and listened to the cry of the oppressed? … If you had a couple thousand priests in one place, the earth would tremble.”
Wellman explains that, for Bell,
“In Christ the goal of discipleship is to restore the new creation and to proclaim the kingdom of God, the state and condition of shalom. … The life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ inaugurate a new creation, and the church is the extension and messenger of that new story — or as Bell proclaims, ‘a better story.’”
Bell’s theology of a “priesthood of all believers” extended as far as believing that setting some people aside as missionaries “undercuts the notion that everyone in the church is in mission. To call some missionaries sends all the wrong messages — that somehow business people, educators, or social workers are not missionaries. Everyone, if they are a Christian, is in full-time ministry.” And, “for Bell, the idea that churches should be sending money to separate organizations that feed the poor or help the needy makes little sense. … As he would say, ‘Why do the agencies get to have all the fun?’”
In this sense, Bell really was a leader of the missional church movement in North America, but Wellman notes “his refusal to see himself as a leader of a movement” and says that Bell, most recently, has become “less committed to sustaining a religious movement per se. In fact, Bell’s interest in creating a social movement seems to have come to an end. … His future is less about creating social movements than about sharing his spiritual findings.” Bell is clearly still a leader, a “postmodern evangelist, slam poet, Billy Graham type” (in Wellman’s terms), and I doubt his dreams for making an impact for God’s kingdom have died in his short time in Hollywood.
In conversation with Wellman, Bell explains, “Developmentally, the church should be a catalyst for the kingdom of God; it awakens and aligns us.” But then, Bell adds (almost as a warning), “We gather together, but if we stay together too long we’ll start creating a separate thing and start working against the thing we wanted to do in the first place.”
Mission then, for Bell, “is not a message given but a life lived; there is no ticket for another world,” according to Wellman. “It is a life pressed into God’s ecstatic power that produces what is true, good, and beautiful in this world.”
“This world is where the action is,” Wellman writes. Or in Bell’s words, from his closing message to Mars Hill Grand Rapids,
“Remember, the movement is word to flesh. Beware of those who will take the flesh and want to turn it back into words.”
I think that’s what Rob Bell is doing now. He’s living out his faith by living into his true calling, his true self. Which is a deeply missional, incarnational move.
And I won’t be surprised if Bell’s journey of personal faithfulness to the Gospel results in something really significant for the wider world. It’s happened before. It could happen again.
What do you think about Rob Bell? Are you intrigued enough to read a whole book about him? Why or why not?