<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yeah&#8230; it&#8217;s that scarf thing again.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/mmw/2008/09/yeah-its-that-scarf-thing-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/mmw/2008/09/yeah-its-that-scarf-thing-again/</link>
	<description>Looking at Muslim women in the media and pop culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:36:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/mmw/2008/09/yeah-its-that-scarf-thing-again/#comment-1968</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 12:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muslimahmediawatch.wordpress.com/?p=894#comment-1968</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a group of &#039;feminists&#039; not represented in this discussion, Christian women (we qualify as feminists because we see in the person of Mary, the mother of Christ, God&#039;s statement about the super-equality of women). Believe it or not, Christian women are supposed to, and love to, dress modestly. And it is this same group of women who are targeted most avidly by Islam-bashers. Devout Muslim women and devout Christian women have so much in common! And yet Christian women get swept up in anti-veil sentiment! It&#039;s completely ridiculous (at least after we are disabused of the notion that the veil is forced upon unwilling women; I myself didn&#039;t fully realize this until the Gallup poll of world-wide Muslims was released).

I personally have started my own one-woman campaign to show more gratitude to Muslim women. I&#039;ve written about it on my blog in two pieces that relate to veiling, one called Muslim Veil No Threat, on page one at the bottom, and the other Who Loves Ya, the current post, and I would welcome a comment from any of the bright voices commenting here. The two points I was trying to make are, first, a thanks to veiled Muslim for demonstrating modesty, and second, Christians are asked to veil, too--but in our case, it&#039;s the men! And they should get on with it, please!

My blog is http://thewhitelilyblog.wordpress.com

&lt;strong&gt;[This comment has been edited to fit within moderation guidelines.]&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a group of &#8216;feminists&#8217; not represented in this discussion, Christian women (we qualify as feminists because we see in the person of Mary, the mother of Christ, God&#8217;s statement about the super-equality of women). Believe it or not, Christian women are supposed to, and love to, dress modestly. And it is this same group of women who are targeted most avidly by Islam-bashers. Devout Muslim women and devout Christian women have so much in common! And yet Christian women get swept up in anti-veil sentiment! It&#8217;s completely ridiculous (at least after we are disabused of the notion that the veil is forced upon unwilling women; I myself didn&#8217;t fully realize this until the Gallup poll of world-wide Muslims was released).</p>
<p>I personally have started my own one-woman campaign to show more gratitude to Muslim women. I&#8217;ve written about it on my blog in two pieces that relate to veiling, one called Muslim Veil No Threat, on page one at the bottom, and the other Who Loves Ya, the current post, and I would welcome a comment from any of the bright voices commenting here. The two points I was trying to make are, first, a thanks to veiled Muslim for demonstrating modesty, and second, Christians are asked to veil, too&#8211;but in our case, it&#8217;s the men! And they should get on with it, please!</p>
<p>My blog is <a href="http://thewhitelilyblog.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://thewhitelilyblog.wordpress.com</a></p>
<p><strong>[This comment has been edited to fit within moderation guidelines.]</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samira</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/mmw/2008/09/yeah-its-that-scarf-thing-again/#comment-1967</link>
		<dc:creator>Samira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 17:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muslimahmediawatch.wordpress.com/?p=894#comment-1967</guid>
		<description>Case in point-

The Philly urban style &quot;male capri.&quot; For any person who knows Muslim communities in Philly you might have noticed for quite awhile a large number of  brothers cutting jeans short in respect to the Hadith about pants dragging in the dirt in a display of arrogance and in a desire to maintain their modesty.

Now you will see how normalized these types of pants are in the area-they are now manufactured already cut. I remember listening to a white radio host talking about how &quot;all the brothers (meaning black dudes) in Philly like to wear their male capris&quot; as he was not aware of the beginnings of this in Muslim circles.

 My point is that a lot of brothers are not simply doing when in Rome-they are actively choosing to dress in a manner that expresses a Muslim identity and that merges Western styles just like many sisters.

Yet this always seems to be under the radar because if your vision is always fixated on that piece of cloth that the women wear on their heads how can you see how Muslim men are dressing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Case in point-</p>
<p>The Philly urban style &#8220;male capri.&#8221; For any person who knows Muslim communities in Philly you might have noticed for quite awhile a large number of  brothers cutting jeans short in respect to the Hadith about pants dragging in the dirt in a display of arrogance and in a desire to maintain their modesty.</p>
<p>Now you will see how normalized these types of pants are in the area-they are now manufactured already cut. I remember listening to a white radio host talking about how &#8220;all the brothers (meaning black dudes) in Philly like to wear their male capris&#8221; as he was not aware of the beginnings of this in Muslim circles.</p>
<p> My point is that a lot of brothers are not simply doing when in Rome-they are actively choosing to dress in a manner that expresses a Muslim identity and that merges Western styles just like many sisters.</p>
<p>Yet this always seems to be under the radar because if your vision is always fixated on that piece of cloth that the women wear on their heads how can you see how Muslim men are dressing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samira</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/mmw/2008/09/yeah-its-that-scarf-thing-again/#comment-1966</link>
		<dc:creator>Samira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 17:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muslimahmediawatch.wordpress.com/?p=894#comment-1966</guid>
		<description>From Achelois:
A man in an ankle high kundoora and kufi walking in Times Square will be just as odd as a woman in burqa.
-Yes, Times Square has been totally Disneyified-but I still find that seeing a dude in a kundoora and kufi is not as dramatic as you would think in NYC. People just don&#039;t care that much.


&quot;The problem is while the men wear Western clothes when out and about in the West, they or their women themselves continue to wear their cultural clothes. That is the problem. That is what gives the illusion that they are oppressed because men are doing in Rome as Romans do but the women are still living in 7th Century Arabia.&quot;

In my opinion this is a matter of perspective. There are some people (Muslim and non-Muslim) who-no matter what you are wearing-only see the headscarf and for them this will always mean 7th Century Arabia. You could be in a chic business suit and have a silk, Italian scarf around your hair and they still think oppression. Yet, how 7th century is that?

Even for the sisters I know who wear only abaya or jilbab in their interpretation of hijab do it in very interesting and modern ways.  Yet if you are convinced that any conformity to a certain code of Islamic modesty is archaic it is more difficult to see the nuances of modern Islamic dress on the part of both men and women.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Achelois:<br />
A man in an ankle high kundoora and kufi walking in Times Square will be just as odd as a woman in burqa.<br />
-Yes, Times Square has been totally Disneyified-but I still find that seeing a dude in a kundoora and kufi is not as dramatic as you would think in NYC. People just don&#8217;t care that much.</p>
<p>&#8220;The problem is while the men wear Western clothes when out and about in the West, they or their women themselves continue to wear their cultural clothes. That is the problem. That is what gives the illusion that they are oppressed because men are doing in Rome as Romans do but the women are still living in 7th Century Arabia.&#8221;</p>
<p>In my opinion this is a matter of perspective. There are some people (Muslim and non-Muslim) who-no matter what you are wearing-only see the headscarf and for them this will always mean 7th Century Arabia. You could be in a chic business suit and have a silk, Italian scarf around your hair and they still think oppression. Yet, how 7th century is that?</p>
<p>Even for the sisters I know who wear only abaya or jilbab in their interpretation of hijab do it in very interesting and modern ways.  Yet if you are convinced that any conformity to a certain code of Islamic modesty is archaic it is more difficult to see the nuances of modern Islamic dress on the part of both men and women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: krista</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/mmw/2008/09/yeah-its-that-scarf-thing-again/#comment-1965</link>
		<dc:creator>krista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 19:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muslimahmediawatch.wordpress.com/?p=894#comment-1965</guid>
		<description>Haha, no worries Anti-Flag, I won&#039;t ask you to explain the whole thing ;)  Sounds interesting though, I hope you&#039;ll keep throwing in some insights from it over here on MMW every so often!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, no worries Anti-Flag, I won&#8217;t ask you to explain the whole thing <img src='http://www.patheos.com/blogs/mmw/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   Sounds interesting though, I hope you&#8217;ll keep throwing in some insights from it over here on MMW every so often!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; MMW Weekly Roundup 9/19/08 Talk Islam</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/mmw/2008/09/yeah-its-that-scarf-thing-again/#comment-1964</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; MMW Weekly Roundup 9/19/08 Talk Islam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 03:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muslimahmediawatch.wordpress.com/?p=894#comment-1964</guid>
		<description>[...] week on MMW, we get a rousing discussion on why some people just can&#8217;t get over headscarves, rip Khalil al-Anani a new one, dissect American Dad&#8217;s depiction of Saudi women, watch [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week on MMW, we get a rousing discussion on why some people just can&#8217;t get over headscarves, rip Khalil al-Anani a new one, dissect American Dad&#8217;s depiction of Saudi women, watch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anti-Flag</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/mmw/2008/09/yeah-its-that-scarf-thing-again/#comment-1963</link>
		<dc:creator>Anti-Flag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 01:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muslimahmediawatch.wordpress.com/?p=894#comment-1963</guid>
		<description>Krista, if I explain my thesis, i&#039;ll be here for a long while. Hehe. But yeah, it&#039;s focused on the hijab in France, Tunisia and Iran. How it constructs identity and it&#039;s role( s) in colonial mimesis-- to put it as simply as I can. But i&#039;ll add more on here when similar topics are discussed, or on my blog, so you get a better understanding of the type of research i&#039;m looking at.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Krista, if I explain my thesis, i&#8217;ll be here for a long while. Hehe. But yeah, it&#8217;s focused on the hijab in France, Tunisia and Iran. How it constructs identity and it&#8217;s role( s) in colonial mimesis&#8211; to put it as simply as I can. But i&#8217;ll add more on here when similar topics are discussed, or on my blog, so you get a better understanding of the type of research i&#8217;m looking at.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: krista</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/mmw/2008/09/yeah-its-that-scarf-thing-again/#comment-1975</link>
		<dc:creator>krista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 20:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muslimahmediawatch.wordpress.com/?p=894#comment-1975</guid>
		<description>Woah, we&#039;re getting some good comments here, thanks everyone :)

@ Achelois: I appreciate your reflection that the scarf has historically been a marker of culture and class, not only of religion.  It adds important layers to the debate, and totally doesn&#039;t get discussed in most forums.  I also really like your point about it being a religious choice rather than a personal choice.  I tried to say something about that in my original point, but I think I ended up leaving it out because I couldn&#039;t figure out how to say it.  (Actually, I feel like I did say it somewhere, but can&#039;t find it, so maybe I just imagined it.)  Anyway, I think that&#039;s also something really important to bring into these discussions, since for many women, it&#039;s really not so simple that they can just say, oh, I don&#039;t want to wear this anymore, and get rid of it.  And whether or not people agree with that understanding, they&#039;re never going to get anywhere if they don&#039;t engage with it, rather than just telling the scarf-wearer that she should just get over it and take it off.

I disagree with you though that &quot;feminism&quot; (and by that I mean the problematic imperialist-type feminism that we&#039;ve been talking about) isn&#039;t the problem, or at least part of it.  While you&#039;re right that there are other processes going on as well (westernisation, globalisation, etc.), I think that the particular image of veil=oppressed does capture the attention of many feminists, who, in a misguided attempt to fight for women&#039;s rights, often end up further oppressing the women that they&#039;re trying to &quot;help,&quot; by acting paternalistic and assuming they know what&#039;s right for them.  So I do think that some forms of feminism are deeply problematic and even harmful in this context.  This doesn&#039;t happen in a vacuum though, and as you say, other things like westernisation and globalisation (I&#039;m going to add racism too) also play into it.

@ Anti-Flag: Thanks for all the historical/colonial context you&#039;ve given here.  These issues are really relevant in talking about why people get so freaked out about the veil, and neither my posts nor al Yafai&#039;s article really touched on the historical dimensions of this obsession.  Great point about Fanon and Bhabha and the hijab as contradictory to the colonial project of assimilation.  It sounds like you&#039;re doing a thesis related to this topic?  I&#039;d love to hear more about what you&#039;re focusing on.

@ coolred38: I agree with you that the hijab has a history that predates Western interaction with it...  but the focus of this post is why people in the West (media, certain &quot;feminists&quot;, etc.) have such an obsession with it, as a (supposed) marker of difference, oppression, and so on.  So that&#039;s why the focus has been on the West &quot;making it an issue&quot; here.  The history of the headscarf prior to this is a whole other discussion (and not one I really know enough to talk about!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woah, we&#8217;re getting some good comments here, thanks everyone <img src='http://www.patheos.com/blogs/mmw/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>@ Achelois: I appreciate your reflection that the scarf has historically been a marker of culture and class, not only of religion.  It adds important layers to the debate, and totally doesn&#8217;t get discussed in most forums.  I also really like your point about it being a religious choice rather than a personal choice.  I tried to say something about that in my original point, but I think I ended up leaving it out because I couldn&#8217;t figure out how to say it.  (Actually, I feel like I did say it somewhere, but can&#8217;t find it, so maybe I just imagined it.)  Anyway, I think that&#8217;s also something really important to bring into these discussions, since for many women, it&#8217;s really not so simple that they can just say, oh, I don&#8217;t want to wear this anymore, and get rid of it.  And whether or not people agree with that understanding, they&#8217;re never going to get anywhere if they don&#8217;t engage with it, rather than just telling the scarf-wearer that she should just get over it and take it off.</p>
<p>I disagree with you though that &#8220;feminism&#8221; (and by that I mean the problematic imperialist-type feminism that we&#8217;ve been talking about) isn&#8217;t the problem, or at least part of it.  While you&#8217;re right that there are other processes going on as well (westernisation, globalisation, etc.), I think that the particular image of veil=oppressed does capture the attention of many feminists, who, in a misguided attempt to fight for women&#8217;s rights, often end up further oppressing the women that they&#8217;re trying to &#8220;help,&#8221; by acting paternalistic and assuming they know what&#8217;s right for them.  So I do think that some forms of feminism are deeply problematic and even harmful in this context.  This doesn&#8217;t happen in a vacuum though, and as you say, other things like westernisation and globalisation (I&#8217;m going to add racism too) also play into it.</p>
<p>@ Anti-Flag: Thanks for all the historical/colonial context you&#8217;ve given here.  These issues are really relevant in talking about why people get so freaked out about the veil, and neither my posts nor al Yafai&#8217;s article really touched on the historical dimensions of this obsession.  Great point about Fanon and Bhabha and the hijab as contradictory to the colonial project of assimilation.  It sounds like you&#8217;re doing a thesis related to this topic?  I&#8217;d love to hear more about what you&#8217;re focusing on.</p>
<p>@ coolred38: I agree with you that the hijab has a history that predates Western interaction with it&#8230;  but the focus of this post is why people in the West (media, certain &#8220;feminists&#8221;, etc.) have such an obsession with it, as a (supposed) marker of difference, oppression, and so on.  So that&#8217;s why the focus has been on the West &#8220;making it an issue&#8221; here.  The history of the headscarf prior to this is a whole other discussion (and not one I really know enough to talk about!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On the semantic strength of fabric &#171; Achelois: a retired goddess</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/mmw/2008/09/yeah-its-that-scarf-thing-again/#comment-1974</link>
		<dc:creator>On the semantic strength of fabric &#171; Achelois: a retired goddess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muslimahmediawatch.wordpress.com/?p=894#comment-1974</guid>
		<description>[...] can read the other comments and go to al-Yafai’s article from MMW here; I will only share with you what I had to say which I have edited before reproducing here to delete [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can read the other comments and go to al-Yafai’s article from MMW here; I will only share with you what I had to say which I have edited before reproducing here to delete [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coolred38</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/mmw/2008/09/yeah-its-that-scarf-thing-again/#comment-1973</link>
		<dc:creator>coolred38</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muslimahmediawatch.wordpress.com/?p=894#comment-1973</guid>
		<description>I dont agree that  the hijab was a non issue until the &quot;West&quot; came along and made it an issue...the west was very ignorant of the middle east until fairly recently...and since women had little voice way back when(not much has changed)...how do we know whether it was an issue or not? Sometimes we need someoe else to show us how to open our mouth and reject, repel, refuse...something that we&#039;ve always just sucked up before...just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont agree that  the hijab was a non issue until the &#8220;West&#8221; came along and made it an issue&#8230;the west was very ignorant of the middle east until fairly recently&#8230;and since women had little voice way back when(not much has changed)&#8230;how do we know whether it was an issue or not? Sometimes we need someoe else to show us how to open our mouth and reject, repel, refuse&#8230;something that we&#8217;ve always just sucked up before&#8230;just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Achelois</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/mmw/2008/09/yeah-its-that-scarf-thing-again/#comment-1976</link>
		<dc:creator>Achelois</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 07:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muslimahmediawatch.wordpress.com/?p=894#comment-1976</guid>
		<description>Oh yes, Anti-Flag that is so true. While the *inferior* race is looked down up there is also the pressure of assimilation and your last sentence would be so true in that situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes, Anti-Flag that is so true. While the *inferior* race is looked down up there is also the pressure of assimilation and your last sentence would be so true in that situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.023 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 345/353 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.patheos.com @ 2012-02-09 10:24:11 -->
