Harassment = Jail Time!

Egyptian women have something to celebrate: yesterday the first man in Egyptian history was sentenced to jail for sexual harassment. And not just any sentence: three years in jail with hard labor in addition to an LE 5,001 fine (approximately $1,000). An unexpected, but very welcome sentence.

27-year-old filmmaker Noha Rushdie Saleh was groped last June by 28-year-old van driver Sharif Gomaa as he drove alongside her, who grabbed her breasts so forcefully she fell.

But Noha didn’t ‘let it go’ as so many Egyptian women do—the most recent Egyptian Center for Women’s Rights (ECWR) survey says that only 2.4% of the 1010 women surveyed who experience sexual harassment filed reports of the incident.

Instead, as Noha recounts in a great interview with the weekly Egyptian independent Al-Yom Al-Sabe’ (The Seventh Day, unfortunately not available in English), she kicked up a fuss by holding on to the van’s side mirror before Gomaa could drive off. An hour later she managed to drag him into the police station with the help of one passerby, to the disapproval of many onlookers, some who told her it was her fault for what she was wearing (a baggy sports outfit). The police refused at first to listen to her, and advised her to accept the driver’s apology to avoid “scandal.”

Sexual harassment in Egypt and many other countries, as we’ve discussed many times here on MMW, is often perceived to be the fault of the woman—that she someone ‘wanted it’ or provoked it. I won’t go into an analysis of the Egyptian psyche when it comes to harassment here, and instead offer you this great post which analyzes the reactions of the onlookers in Noha’s case.

The sentence is believed to have been so harsh to set an example. Egyptian law does not address the issue of sexual harassment, though it does address Hatk el ‘ard, proved sexual assault, which carries a maximum one year jail sentence and an LE 100 ($20) fine, in Article 306 of the Penal Law.

Gomaa’s sentence, according to an ECWR press release:

“Will restore confidence in the legal system’s ability to defend women subjected to such crimes, in every step of the process – from filing police reports, to investigation, to sentencing. [It] sends a message to all segments of Egyptian society that sexual harassment is a crime and will not be tolerated. The sentence will also encourage participation in the dialogue on developing a legal definition of sexual harassment and the need to formulate laws criminalizing it in the Egyptian Penal Code. The success of the victim in this case will encourage others to report incidences of sexual harassment. For potential harassers, the sentence will deter them from abusing women’s rights to personal safety and freedom from sexual harassment.”

Here’s hoping.

According to Al-Masry Al-Youm, (The Egyptian Today), a daily independent Egyptian newspaper:

“The victim asked that the session be made public since it was an issue of ‘public opinion.’ The defense refused, calling the case ‘trivial.’ The court decided to keep the session private, in order to prevent ‘tarnishing public modesty’ with the phrases mentioned in the harassment incident and to preserve public morals.”

Noha in the courtroom. Image via Al Masry Al Youm.

Noha in the courtroom. Image via Al Masry Al Youm.

I think I barfed a little there. And a bit more when I see how they contrast the victim’s mother as “wearing her abaya and veil,” with Noha’s “half-sleeved jeans shirt and blue jeans.” (pictured right)

The ruling was covered in both international and local press as well as all over the blogsphere. But what I found to be very revealing was reading the hundreds of comments on local press websites, and seeing what the public really thinks.

Of course, a lot of comments were happy for Noha, and applauded her actions. I thought it was doubly interesting to see that a lot of men out there were also applauding her, given that a large percentage of Egyptian men (and this is not just generalizing, statistics confirm this) think there’s nothing wrong with sexual harassment. Some men were even critiquing not only the harasser but also the police men who did nothing to help Noha.

But there were also many troubling comments, especially the ones that weren’t openly hostile, but the ones agreeing that the man was at fault, but saying so was Noha. Here’s a very small selection (translated):

“Just like terrorists in Afghanistan are victims of their communities, so are sexual harassers. With what logic do we take a person into account for stealing when their community doesn’t provide food?” Mounir Nabil (Facebook).

“Even though I do not support any rape or harassment of any women I still put part of the responsibility on women as a result of their lack of modesty in dress and their walk, and not considering the circumstances youth go through in that there are no jobs for marriage. Look at university students wearing T-shirts that show half their naked stomachs. Does this mesh with out traditions and religion?” An Egyptian Citizen. (Al-Masry Al-Youm).

“An unfair ruling. Now any woman any man talks to will say he’s harassing me” Amir (Al-Masry Al-Youm).

“Cover yourself with the hijab. I don’t deny that what happened to you was sad in a community that has lost its values and manners but you as you appear in your picture with hair uncovered are one of the factors that helped the person harass you. Have we heard of harassment of a covered woman? Of course not […] So cover yourself before you live in the role of the hero who showcased her body so the misguided wolves devoured her.” Mahmoud Abo El-Kheir. (Al-Yom Al-Sabe’).

“Everyone must respect themselves. The man should have been executed. But just like the judge punished the man he should have punished the woman because just like all the other girls in the Egyptian streets she was wearing scandalous clothing. I hope we fix the problem of women’s dress before we fix sexual harassment.” Anonymous (Al-Masry Al-Youm).

“You aren’t brave. You exploited the circumstances so you could be a media entry where satellite [channels] could speak about you. You are looking for fame and found out that being a producer was a long way so this was your chance. If there is harassment in the society then you are a reason because I do not see in you shyness and the religious girl. […] One of your interviewers [asked you] how were you harassed? You said: “He held me from my breasts!!!” Did you have to clarify completely? Did the society forget what sexual harassment was? But in this way you became famous. May God guide you […] It is impossible for a veiled women who sticks to manners to be harassed. Fathy Mahmoud Morsy. (Al-Yom Al-Sabe’).

“I swear to God if I was the judge I would have said [Gomaa] was innocent and given him a reward. Those girls are a bunch of human rights animals. A group of women who leave their husbands and flick through satellite channels. [They] leave their husbands [alone]. What can they do except harass another woman? I swear to god this is an unfaaaaaaaaaaaaaaair ruling.” Khalifa Al-Zaatary (Al-Masry Al-Youm).

“Is the problem with the youth in this country or the scandalous naked clothing which make men desire women?” Sayed. (Al-Masry Al-Youm).

Sigh. To repeat, for the 1000th time: Veiled women are harassed just as much as unveiled women do. In Egypt, a country where over 80% of the women are veiled, 83% of women are harassed. Harassment occurs for a multitude of reasons, not because of dress.

I’ll end with one quote I particularly liked:

” ‘And the defendant’s mother sat wearing her abaya and veil next to his brother, crying and saying her son is innocent and wouldn’t do such things.’ [quoting Al-Masry al-Youm newspaper]. I wish just once one mother of one of you of this country would admit she wasn’t able to raise [her kids] instead of them throwing their [misdeeds] on others and saying we didn’t do anything.” Amina Zaki (Facebook).

So true. I believe the way you are raised has as much of an impact on you as does your environment. If men in Egypt are raised to understand that women are equal and deserve respect, a lot less women would be harassed. But as long as the mentality persists that the women are to blame, we will remain as we are. Punishing the harasser is a great step, but it’s not what’s most important: we need to stop men from harassing women in the first place.

NPR gives us an Orientalist romance

When I started to read a recent NPR story about an Iraqi woman married to an American sergeant, I had to double check to make sure that I was actually reading a news story and not a piece of Orientalist fiction. “From The Iraq War, A Troubled Romance In America” is filled with so many Orientalist cliches that even a reporter from Fox News would be happy.

The article starts out with the usual physical description of Muslim woman’s dress. “Munira Shahamorad was 20 years old and dressed head to toe in all-concealing black robes when she showed up at the gates of the U.S. Marine base in Fallujah, Iraq, looking for a job.” The imagery of this first sentence sets the tone for the rest of the article. We’re given the stereotypical image of the oppressed Muslim woman who is covered from head to toe and who is begging for help from Whites–the White man’s burden. The U.S. military is already set up as Munira’s savior. This image is complete when we’re told that Munira is running away from her abusive older brother. Thus, another Muslim woman has been saved from a brutish Muslim man by a Western occupying power.

Munira and Steve. Image by Paxton Winters for NPR

Munira and Steve. Image by Paxton Winters for NPR

The Orientalist theme continues throughout the article. Munira finds a job with the military and does not go back to see her family. We’re told that signing on with the military “could have meant a death sentence — probably in the form of an ‘honor killing’ carried out by a male relative.” Munira’s family stereotyped as being oppressive and brutal and Munira herself is stereotyped as a victim.

While at the military base, Munira meets her future husband, Sgt. Steve Campbell. The authors of the story, Ivan Watson and Paxton Winters, move on to Munira and Steve’s life in America. They encounter financial difficulties which forces Munira to work. Since she doesn’t a have a visa and thus cannot legally work, Munira becomes a stripper to help the family make ends meet. Thus, Munira has come full circle from being fully covered from head to toe to stripping in a club. The ultimate Orientalist fantasy of a Muslim woman becoming unveiled and revealing an attractive body for male consumption.

Munira’s story is real and and in some ways tragic (she ends up being kicked out of her home by her husband) and I think it needs to be told. However, I wonder why her story was told in such a sensationalist manner. Her story could have been told without the stereotypes. There was no need to immediately start off with a description her dress or to portray her as a victim. She obviously fought to have a better life in Iraq and the U.S. Why couldn’t this aspect of Munira’s personality be focused on more? I struggled to find any positive in this story and came up woefully short. This is a just another in the many tales of the oppressed Muslim woman yearning for freedom and love.

No Headscarf, No Entry: Golshifteh Farahani’s Dilemma

MMW‘s Friday Links last week had within it three links about Iranian actress Golshifteh Farahani (below), who has appeared in the recent Hollywood film Body of Lies. Apparently, from the news reports, it seems that Farahani has created quite a stir within Iran, or as the LA Times reported some “Middle East-style intrigue”. Middle East-style intrigue? What is Middle East-style intrigue? Are they referring to the issue some Iranians are having with her appearance in an American film? The comment comes across as quite patronizing of Iranian sentiment. So what is this “Middle East-style intrigue” about?

Golshifteh Farahani, as she appeared in Body of Lies. Via imdb.com.

Golshifteh Farahani, as she appeared in Body of Lies. Via IMDB; full credits unavailable.

Initially, the problems occurred with her appearance in an American film. The Daily News reported that Farahani was interrogated by Iranian intelligence many times, only to be finally told by a judge that once they had viewed the film they would decide what to do with her. In August there were even reports of her not being allowed to leave Iran for the Hollywood premiere of the film. As of late, The Daily News reports that a court in Iran is trying to decide whether or not she broke any Iranian laws by acting in the film.

However, eventually she was able to leave Iran and did in fact attend the Hollywood premiere, and, shock of all shocks, she did so without a headscarf (pictured below left). As a result, it seems from The Washington Post and The Daily News, now Farahani fears going back to Iran.

Farahani at the Hollywood premiere. Picture via Getty Images, by Astrid Stawiarz.

Farahani at the Hollywood premiere. Picture via Getty Images, by Astrid Stawiarz.

This is not the first time a prominent Iranian woman has appeared abroad without the headscarf. Iranian human rights activist Shirin Ebadi appeared without a headscarf when she went to Sweden to receive the Nobel Peace Prize she won in 2003, and created controversy then for appearing headscarf-less. However, she was able to return home, suggesting that perhaps returning home may not be a pipe dream for Farahani. A life of exile, as The Daily News predicts, may not be a reality for Farahani.

It seems reaction to Farahani has been mixed in Iran. The Washington Post article tells us that “[o]n the Internet, which is subject to less censorship in Iran than print media, Farahani without a scarf is a hot topic.” It then reports the various comments which are being posted online by both her supporters and her detractors. Among the comments listed in the article the sense one gets is that opposition to Farahani’s attire decision is based in Islamic religiousness. One angry commenter, Mahdavi, is described as a religious student (this is how he describes himself). He is reported as saying “[h]er being without a head scarf means she belongs to the rude and inconsiderate young generation that has no respect for Islamic values.” The other commenters, who support Farahani, are given no religious distinction.

The Washington Post article also points out the report of a pro-government newspaper which criticized not Farahani, but Western media for Farahani’s scarfless appearance, calling it a media conspiracy. Now I do not doubt this claim was made, but I do wish another perspective from another newspaper or magazine had been reported. I did my own search and did not find any articles from Iranian English language newspapers on the issue – supportive or otherwise. Maybe this incident isn’t as big a deal in Iran as it appears to be from the American articles. At this point, it’s important to remember that last we have heard the judge had wanted to view the film before making any decision. We have yet to hear the final decision. They really may not care.

But according to The Daily News it is a big deal. They say “[i]t’s hard to see what would bother them. Farahani plays a nurse who treats DiCaprio’s character, but is wary of his advances, insisting that he first meet her family. She won’t even shake his hand.” What The Daily News forgets is that perhaps it is not what she does in the film but rather the political implications of working in a film of the country that constantly threatens to bomb you. This is the same country that currently has a man, John McCain, running for president who in the recent past sang a song about bombing Iran. A song about bombing people. This may have something to do with their discomfort, along with perhaps Farahani’s removal of the headscarf in the film.

The Daily News also makes the odd conflation of a Saudi Arabian judge’s threat to “execute satellite broadcast providers who import “deviant” Western movies” and Farahani’s fear to return to Iran. Iran and Saudi Arabia are different countries, Daily News. And they don’t see eye to eye. This is yet another example of seeing all Muslims as the same, or perhaps all people “over there” as the same.

Although Farahani’s fear should not be minimized nor trivialized, we also have to keep things in perspective. Being fully aware of Western media’s depiction of Iran’s treatment of women, we cannot be sure that the coverage presented thus far has been fair and has not inflated the issue. Perhaps we need to wait this one out a little and see if the fuss continues and its outcomes.

Now, I haven’t viewed the film yet and would welcome comments from those who have viewed it. Is the upset worth it?