<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shortlist for &#8220;Arab Booker&#8221;: Where are the women?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/mmw/2010/01/shortlist-for-arab-booker-where-are-the-women/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/mmw/2010/01/shortlist-for-arab-booker-where-are-the-women/</link>
	<description>Looking at Muslim women in the media and pop culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:36:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekend Link Love &#171; The Feminist Texican</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/mmw/2010/01/shortlist-for-arab-booker-where-are-the-women/#comment-7720</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekend Link Love &#171; The Feminist Texican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 21:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muslimahmediawatch.org/?p=5386#comment-7720</guid>
		<description>[...] Muslimah Media Watch: Shortlist for “Arab Booker”: Where are the women? [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Muslimah Media Watch: Shortlist for “Arab Booker”: Where are the women? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zahra (with a Z)</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/mmw/2010/01/shortlist-for-arab-booker-where-are-the-women/#comment-7719</link>
		<dc:creator>Zahra (with a Z)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 16:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muslimahmediawatch.org/?p=5386#comment-7719</guid>
		<description>A very interesting piece. I&#039;m glad to learn more about this prize, and Awad&#039;s words about tokenism are dead-on. There may not be a deliberate effort to have only one women per year, but the more years the pattern happens the more suspicious it looks.

Male bias in &quot;literary fiction&quot; book publishing, and especialy amongst prestigious prizes, has been a pervasive problem in the US and UK, where short-lists and judging panels often remain overwhelmingly male, even as the vast majority of writers publishing fiction (and readers) have become female.

I&#039;ll be interested to see if media coverage has any effect on this prize next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very interesting piece. I&#8217;m glad to learn more about this prize, and Awad&#8217;s words about tokenism are dead-on. There may not be a deliberate effort to have only one women per year, but the more years the pattern happens the more suspicious it looks.</p>
<p>Male bias in &#8220;literary fiction&#8221; book publishing, and especialy amongst prestigious prizes, has been a pervasive problem in the US and UK, where short-lists and judging panels often remain overwhelmingly male, even as the vast majority of writers publishing fiction (and readers) have become female.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be interested to see if media coverage has any effect on this prize next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 223/243 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.patheos.com @ 2012-02-09 13:58:05 -->
