<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friday Links &#8212; July 16, 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/mmw/2010/07/friday-links-july-16-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/mmw/2010/07/friday-links-july-16-2010/</link>
	<description>Looking at Muslim women in the media and pop culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:20:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara Haji spanks Maureen Dowd — and other insight from the minds of Muslim ladies at Muslimah Media Watch &#124; Hanif on Media</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/mmw/2010/07/friday-links-july-16-2010/#comment-8574</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara Haji spanks Maureen Dowd — and other insight from the minds of Muslim ladies at Muslimah Media Watch &#124; Hanif on Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muslimahmediawatch.org/?p=6558#comment-8574</guid>
		<description>[...] politicians&#8217; thinly veiled obsession with defining how Muslim women should dress, see here and [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] politicians&#8217; thinly veiled obsession with defining how Muslim women should dress, see here and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dude</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/mmw/2010/07/friday-links-july-16-2010/#comment-8573</link>
		<dc:creator>Dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 01:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muslimahmediawatch.org/?p=6558#comment-8573</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;and that polygamy often enough results in more economic insecurity for women and children rather than less.&lt;/i&gt;

But that&#039;s &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; what the statistic points out. You need to know how women in nonpolygamous marriages are doing. If 70% of those need to find a job, then it seems first wives in polygamous marriages actually do better than their monogamous counterparts. 

It&#039;s probably not the case, but it would be dishonest to simply assume that the number is lower for monogamous marriages. I can&#039;t find the study, but if the study didn&#039;t look at that statistic, then it&#039;s inconclusive, and poorly designed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>and that polygamy often enough results in more economic insecurity for women and children rather than less.</i></p>
<p>But that&#8217;s <i>not</i> what the statistic points out. You need to know how women in nonpolygamous marriages are doing. If 70% of those need to find a job, then it seems first wives in polygamous marriages actually do better than their monogamous counterparts. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s probably not the case, but it would be dishonest to simply assume that the number is lower for monogamous marriages. I can&#8217;t find the study, but if the study didn&#8217;t look at that statistic, then it&#8217;s inconclusive, and poorly designed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Humayra</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/mmw/2010/07/friday-links-july-16-2010/#comment-8572</link>
		<dc:creator>Humayra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 17:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muslimahmediawatch.org/?p=6558#comment-8572</guid>
		<description>[Article]: &quot;Sisters in Islam’s study on polygyny shows that 44% of first wives in polygynous marriages are forced to find another source of income after her husband married another woman.&quot;

[Dude]: &quot;I feel compelled to point out that the statistic is meaningless without knowing how many wives in nonpolygamous marriages seek other sources of income.&quot;

Not really, given that (1) a common rationalization given for polygamy is that is provides economic security for women and children, and that it therefore benefits the entire society, and (2) women worried about polygamy are often assured that since according to the Shariah, men are bound to support all their wives and children, polygamy is supposed to be an exception and hence, nothing to be worried about. 

The reality, as we can see from this study, is that men who &quot;technically&quot; aren&#039;t entitled to practice polygamy because they can&#039;t afford it find ways of doing it anyway, and that polygamy often enough results in more economic insecurity for women and children rather than less.

While such unpalatable realities are unlikely to change the minds of those who are committed to supporting polygamy for ideological reasons--when they are reminded of the suffering it often causes, they simply change gears and extol the rewards women will supposedly receive in the afterlife for patient suffering--it might make those who care about social justice think a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[Article]: &#8220;Sisters in Islam’s study on polygyny shows that 44% of first wives in polygynous marriages are forced to find another source of income after her husband married another woman.&#8221;</p>
<p>[Dude]: &#8220;I feel compelled to point out that the statistic is meaningless without knowing how many wives in nonpolygamous marriages seek other sources of income.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not really, given that (1) a common rationalization given for polygamy is that is provides economic security for women and children, and that it therefore benefits the entire society, and (2) women worried about polygamy are often assured that since according to the Shariah, men are bound to support all their wives and children, polygamy is supposed to be an exception and hence, nothing to be worried about. </p>
<p>The reality, as we can see from this study, is that men who &#8220;technically&#8221; aren&#8217;t entitled to practice polygamy because they can&#8217;t afford it find ways of doing it anyway, and that polygamy often enough results in more economic insecurity for women and children rather than less.</p>
<p>While such unpalatable realities are unlikely to change the minds of those who are committed to supporting polygamy for ideological reasons&#8211;when they are reminded of the suffering it often causes, they simply change gears and extol the rewards women will supposedly receive in the afterlife for patient suffering&#8211;it might make those who care about social justice think a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dude</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/mmw/2010/07/friday-links-july-16-2010/#comment-8571</link>
		<dc:creator>Dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 06:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muslimahmediawatch.org/?p=6558#comment-8571</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Sisters in Islam’s study on polygyny shows that 44% of first wives in polygynous marriages are forced to find another source of income after her husband married another woman.&lt;/i&gt;

I feel compelled to point out that the statistic is meaningless without knowing how many wives in nonpolygamous marriages seek other sources of income. 

&lt;i&gt;The Canadian Council of Muslim Women opposes the addition of “honor killings” to the Criminal Code on the grounds “murder is murder” and a special category could stigmatize new immigrants and some ethnic or religious groups.&lt;/i&gt;

I must say I more or less agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Sisters in Islam’s study on polygyny shows that 44% of first wives in polygynous marriages are forced to find another source of income after her husband married another woman.</i></p>
<p>I feel compelled to point out that the statistic is meaningless without knowing how many wives in nonpolygamous marriages seek other sources of income. </p>
<p><i>The Canadian Council of Muslim Women opposes the addition of “honor killings” to the Criminal Code on the grounds “murder is murder” and a special category could stigmatize new immigrants and some ethnic or religious groups.</i></p>
<p>I must say I more or less agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dude</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/mmw/2010/07/friday-links-july-16-2010/#comment-8570</link>
		<dc:creator>Dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 06:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muslimahmediawatch.org/?p=6558#comment-8570</guid>
		<description>Good analysis of the news coverage related to the banning of the veil:

http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/07/16/burqa-ban-coverage-of-a-law-to-free-women-leaves-them-voiceless/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good analysis of the news coverage related to the banning of the veil:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/07/16/burqa-ban-coverage-of-a-law-to-free-women-leaves-them-voiceless/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/07/16/burqa-ban-coverage-of-a-law-to-free-women-leaves-them-voiceless/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.007 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 272/280 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.patheos.com @ 2012-02-09 08:08:52 -->
