Maya Khan’s Marriage Police

When your everyday news consists of the purported collapse of your government and a small but unfortunate obsession with treating the ill with fake drugs at a major regional cardiology institute, it seems that very few things will actually cause you to upchuck any remaining disgust floating around in your metaphorically ulcer-ridden stomach.

Maya Khan on Samaa TV. Photo via Huffington Post.

Fortunately for Pakistani TV station Samaa, Maya Khan was able to do just that.

Okay, so maybe I’ve got too much of a flair for the occasional hyperbole, but a recent stunt by the talk show host left many Pakistanis completely bewildered and disgusted. In late January, the morning show host led a team of over a dozen “aunties” into the clutches of moral decay and social destruction commonly referred to as “parks.”

The footage is nothing short of disturbing: a brigade of ‘aunties’ armed with moral superiority and out-of-fashion sunglasses ambush young couples, many of whom try to escape the onslaught of cameras and judgment, and implicate them as bearers of social impurity.  The women, led by Khan and her producer, demand to see the marriage contracts of unsuspecting couples on “dates,” followed by awkward lectures on disobedience to their parents. They miss no opportunity to “shame” the couples, particularly the women, the majority of whom are niqab-clad – a common refuge for Pakistani women wishing to conceal their identity for various reasons.

Parks, in cities like Karachi and Lahore in particular, are renowned date spots specifically for lower-middle class Pakistanis. Public displays of premarital hormonal philandering are far from alien in Pakistan; many young unmarried couples openly eat in restaurants, walk in malls and other such equally sinful areas. But more often than not, these couples come from backgrounds that may not entirely encourage premarital relationships but don’t create a fatalistic fuss over dinner either. Lower-middle-class couples, unable to afford consumerist dating, cover (sometimes literally) their romanticism by spending time together in parks. This so-called “phenomenon” has elicited negative reactions from families who believe such publicization creates for an inappropriate atmosphere for a family outing.

The uproar of disbelief to Khan’s segment of moral cleansing was quick. Pakistanis across social media platforms rose in protest against the unprovoked harassment of innocent couples in public spaces. Perhaps the most notable of responses was from Pakistani blogger Mehreen Kasana, who wrote an open letter to Maya Khan: [Read more...]

Reading Too Much into Veenagate

Veena Malik is a Pakistani actress with a special flair for controversy. She first made major headlines after confronting a Mullah who accused her of inappropriate and vulgar behavior while participating on the Indian reality show ‘Bigg Boss.’ Her confrontation was praised by many, as she took a stand against general double-standards thrown at men and women in Pakistani society as well as staunchly stating that she did not need to be told about her religion.

Veena Malik. Image via Dawn.com.

“I’m a Muslim woman and I know my boundaries.”

She went on to ask why an entertainer was being held accountable for the maintenance of national integrity, whereas politicians and others were let go almost freely from such charges.

Recently, however, Veena Malik was back in the headlines when the cover of the Indian edition of December’s FHM was featured online. The men’s magazine featured a fully nude Malik her hands crossed over her chest, her legs strategically placed and a large ISI tattoo across her upper arm. As immediately as the magazine’s release, Malik immediately claimed that the photo was fake, that it had been “morphed” to make it seem as though she was naked, when in fact she had been dressed.  Claiming deception, Malik filed a defamation suit, for $2 million, against the magazine, which maintained that the cover – along with several other nude shots of the actress – was “un-morphed” and completely done with a more-than-willing Malik. Not only did FHM claim to have video evidence, but it also struck back with a threat of a lawsuit of its own.

The brief but generally uncaring media coverage that followed the release of the image was further bolstered by Malik’s changing account of what she wore during the photo-shoot, going from fully clothed to partially clothed.

At the least from the pelvis down.

Sounds like your usual celebrity gossip dribble, right?

Apparently not so much to folks such as Asra Nomani and Nosheen Iqbal who see the public and media reaction to “Veenagate” as the “real shame of Pakistan.” [Read more...]

The Faux Phallic Fatwa

On December 6th, a headline hit Facebook and Twitter feeds that an unnamed Islamic cleric – a Salafi cleric at that – residing in an unnamed European country declared that women were forbidden from touching and eating fruits and vegetables that were phallic shaped unless accompanied by (“preferably”) a male relative who would then have to cut the demon shaped foods into small pieces. The reasoning behind such a fatwa was that these fruits and vegetables would invoke thoughts of sex within the minds of women and, of course, God forbid that a woman ever comes near that subject in her thoughts.

The innocent-looking cause of all the fuss. Via Bikya Masr.

Even when she’s amidst it.

To anyone with sound judgment the story sounds nothing short of satire worth a chuckle. Or two, at most. Yet the story, reported initially by the Egypt-based Bikya Masr, was picked up immediately by international media hounds rabid with the need for more fodder to fill our feeds. While many doubted the accuracy of the story (and here! And here!), originally taken from the Arabic website Assawsana, many others were quick to point and laugh at the silliness of Muslims and scoff at further proof that Muslim men love nothing more than controlling Muslim women in any way possible, including their daily fruit and veggie servings! Twitter and other social media websites were ablaze with cucumber jokes resonant of a 14 year old boy’s sense of humor. It was, indeed, fun while it lasted.

But not really.

Within less than a week, on December 11, Bikya Misr’s Joseph Mayton posted an editorial apologizing for the story:

“As Editor of Bikyamasr.com, I am disappointed that I did not catch and hold this piece. The “Islamic cleric bans women from touching cucumbers, bananas for sexual resemblance,” article should not have run when it did. Arguably, it should not have been run at all. We should not have published about an “unnamed sheikh” in an unnamed European country unless we were able to garner more information on the issue, both on the sheikh himself and the news website the information was gathered from, independently.”

Perhaps, however, the most important and resounding statement from Mayton’s editorial was the following:

“Reporting in a fair and accurate manner on Islam is a difficult process, and one that Bikyamasr.com takes very seriously.”

And with that, Mayton hit the nail on the head. The Cucumber Fatwa ultimately brings into question not only the accuracy of reporting this particular story but also the accuracy of reporting of other stories relating to Muslim women and Muslim men’s interactions with Muslim women. How often are stories with little fact reported? And how often are these stories forming opinions of not only Islam, but its adherents? Gullible reporting has repercussions beyond a brief headline.

[Read more...]