The most important, most overlooked, most easy and most superlative tool in scripture study: Part 2

(Part 1) I have my functional stylish desk, sharpened pencils, scriptures and a clean slate…. and there it sits, stubbornly remaining that way… blank.

Many people just don’t know what to write in their notes, which often means that they haven’t really crossed the line from scripture reading into scripture study. (The problem with scripture study is you can often barely get through a verse without running down all kinds of interesting rabbit trails, questions, etc.) [Read more...]

The most important, most overlooked, most easy and most superlative tool in scripture study: Part 1

It’s happened to you before. Lots, actually. You’re reading the scriptures, and say “hey, I read something about this that was cool/insightful/important! I wish I’d written it down, because I can’t really remember it.”

Or you’re on a blog, trying to recall that perfectly a propos statement you’ve read, but you can’t even remember when you read it or what the title was, or even if it was print vs. electronic and googling is no help at all.

Or you made some notes somewhere on a lesson you had to teach three years ago, and now suddenly you’re teaching it again and really wish you could remember what brilliant things you’d said.

Each of these benefits from some kind of system of note taking. Note-taking is the best long-term tool in your scripture study, general reading, and all-around pedantry/absent-mindedness. I think note-taking is far more important and productive than scripture-marking, but I don’t believe it’s a skill taught in Seminary and I’m not aware of any good anecdotes or GA’s authoritatively booming “thou shalt take notes!” (The Teaching:No Greater Call manual does mention it briefly.)

I’m going to focus on note-taking and the scriptures in these first two posts, and expand a bit in the third.

Why take notes on the scriptures?

  1. To build. Every time you read, you should have some kind of thoughts. If not, you’re not really paying attention. If you write down your thoughts and other things, the next time you return to the passage, you’re not starting from zero again, because you’re recorded your previous interactions with that passage. Otherwise, whatever epiphanies, aha moments, spiritual morsels, or revelatory insights you have… are gone the next time. If you don’t write it down, it never happened.
  2. To remind and remember. In particular, spiritual experiences and thoughts seem much more resistant to memory than more tangible experiences or knowledge. If they’re connected with your scripture study, write them down to be reminded of them.  I also have in my notes historical experiences connected with passages, like “I visited Nazareth on 3-15-99.” I sometimes date my notes, and as time passes that lets me see my own progression (or retrogression) in various ways. I’ve sometimes gone back and written responses to myself a few years later.
  3. To interact and enhance. Taking notes of various kinds (coming in part 2) requires more thinking and interaction with the scriptures, which helps use different parts of your brain, involving us more  and cementing those scriptures, thoughts and experiences deeper. This results in richer, more effective and more rewarding scripture study.

Part 2 addresses “what do I write?” And part 3 will cover various tools and ideas for keeping track of notes.

Contributing to the Ensign- Interesting Guidelines

EnsignI was looking for something in the Ensign, and noticed two little links at the bottom, “Submit an article to the Ensign. View our updated content submission guidelines.”

Really? Open submissions? Apparently so. How long has this been going on?

The submission guidelines have some interesting things. For example, under the “General Ongoing Needs” section, one sees the first of several desired categories is “By Study and by Faith: These Church history and other academic or scriptural articles are doctrinally sound and serve to edify members. We are particularly interested in articles written by members with expertise in academic fields.” (Italics mine.)

Huh. [Read more...]

Scripture, History and Myth: A Perfect Modern Example from NPR!

We’re way past Genesis at this point, but like the poor, the issue of non-historical scripture will always be among us. Most people know of the genre of “parable” because they’re in the Gospels, but “myth” is very poorly understood and the term carries a lot of negative baggage. You have to be very careful throwing around the term. One simple definition of myth is that myth is worldview in narrative form. That is, it’s a way of explaining one’s  conception of how the world works, in everyday language.

John Walton, another Evangelical Old Testament professor who’s recently earned my respect, elaborates on myth this way.

“Mythology by its nature seeks to explain how the world works and how it came to work that way, and therefore includes a culture’s ‘theory of origins.’ We sometimes label certain literature as ‘myth’ because we do not believe that the world works that way. The label is a way of holding it at arm’s length so as to clarify that we do not share that belief – particularly as it refers to involvement and activities of the gods. But for the people to whom the mythology belonged, it was a real description of deep beliefs. Their “mythology” expressed their beliefs concerning what made the world what it was; it expressed their theories of origins and how their world worked.     By this definition, our modern mythology is represented by science – our own theories of origins and operations. Science provides what is generally viewed as the consensus concerning what the world is, how it works and how it came to be. Today, science makes no room for deity (although neither does it disprove deity), in contrast to the ancient explanations, which were filled with deity.” From Walton’s The Lost World of Genesis One: Ancient Cosmology and the Origins Debate, p. 14-15.

NPR recently provided a perfect example of modern myth. Radiolab featured a discussion with Dr. Fred Coolidge about the hypnic jerk. That’s not a certain kind of internet troll, but that thing you do when you’re 90% asleep, and suddenly… your legs kick and you’re wide awake. That’s a hypnic jerk. No one really knows why it happens.

Coolidge suggests that way back in the past, primates underwent a transitional period between living on the ground and living in the trees. They returned to the trees at night because it was safer, but lived primarily on the ground. Falling out of the tree at night would likely cause injury and expose you to predators on the ground. A  monitoring-and-correction system or a subconscious “am I falling out of the tree?” reflex could conceivably be an evolutionary advantage, one passed down to us as a vestigial sleep habit. In other words, evolutionary biology may explain the hypnic jerk and why so many people dream about falling.

The whole series (of which the hypnic jerk is part six) is interesting and worth listening to, but here’s a rough transcript of the relevant part between the two hosts and the sleep professor.

Prof: “If some of those primates had that behavior, they may have been just slightly more likely over millions of years to adapt and survive.”

Host1: “We haven’t gotten rid of it yet, is what you’re saying.”

Host2: “So that’s my jerk, is basically so I don’t get eaten by a lion, all these many years?

Host1: Yeah, that’s what he’s saying. Sort of like a Lucy echo.

Host1: ‘Do we know this, or are we just imagining…?

Host2: “NO, how are we gonna know this? It’s just a story!” (laughter)

In the last statement, Host 2 recognizes that what they’re telling is a myth, a story (albeit a scientific one) that explains how the world works, as well as the fact that said story can’t be empirically demonstrated.

Can scripture include myth? Or put differently, did ancient prophets share the worldview of their culture and the world around them? I think it’s clear they did, and that God’s revelations to them were adapted and expressed through that worldview. (I should point out, at least two important LDS General Authorities disagree, but that’s for the next post. This is turning into a series.)

Faith and Knowledge Conference(s): Call for Papers and Past Experiences

Several years ago, a conference was organized by Richard Bushman, Terryl Givens, and several LDS graduate students. Concerned by perceptions of a general abandoning of faith among LDS grad students in religion-related fields, the conference’s  focus was encapsulated in its title, Faith and Knowledge. [Read more...]