California’s Same-Sex Marriage Trial

I know the topic of same sex marriage has been discussed here before, but with the recent court case in California, I wanted to put in my proverbial two cents.

On June 16, 2010, a federal court judge in California heard closing arguments in what could be a landmark case. Two couples, one gay, one lesbian, are suing the State of California, arguing that Proposition 8, which denies same sex couples the right to marriage, is a violation of the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution (http://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_Am14.html)

Let me state very clearly that I am a supporter of same-sex marriages. I believe very strongly that one day we will look back at opposition to same-sex marriage in the same light that we now view opposition to interracial marriage. That it will be something we say “I can’t believe people used to think that way!”

I don’t think this is specifically a “Pagan” position, but Paganism does tend to be much more open and accepting than some faiths. In my tradition, we not only recognize masculine and feminine aspects of the Divine, but that those aspects are in each of us. With whom we express our feelings of joy, love and commitment is not important to the Lord and Lady, just that we do express them.

That being said, I think there are some very telling aspects of this particular case and one very important question being missed.

The first is the identities of the attorneys for both the plaintiffs and the State.

The plaintiffs are being led by David Boies and Ted Olson. These are the same two men who opposed each other in front of the Supreme Court in the case of Bush v. Gore in 2000. You remember that little case? The one in which the simple matter of a presidential election was decided? Yes, that one.

And you would think the State is being represented by the State Attorney General. Not so. Neither the California Attorney General (Jerry Brown) nor Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger stepped up to defend Proposition 8. It’s being defended by Andy Pugno (attorney of the conservative advocacy group Protect Marriage) and former Justice Department attorney Charles Cooper.

What does it say about a law when two attorneys from VERY opposite sides of the fence team up to oppose it?

Pages: 1 2 3 4

Which Cheek?

Like everyone else, I’ve been following the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. And like a lot of people, I’m mad.

I’m mad at the constant blame shifting of the corporations. I’m mad that the agency designed to regulate the oil rigs was also set up to receive the royalties from them. I’m mad that people have lost lives for our national dependency on crude. I’m mad that more people are going to lose livelihoods because of the disaster. I’m mad that already fragile wetlands and coastlands are being devastated by the oil. And I’m mad that some people view the loss of all this as just one of the risks of the oil business.

But right now, I’m maddest at those in our system of government who continue to act as if the companies who perpetrated this crime, and to me it is nothing less than a crime, should be apologized to!

I promised myself when I started these blogs that I wouldn’t play the politics game. There’s a darned good reason why politics and religion are the two subjects you don’t bring up in company you don’t know. But after hearing the congressmen today actually apologizing to BP, I have to speak out.

For years, we’ve been hearing from the right that our government shouldn’t be doing so much regulation of industry, that industry can take care of itself and when bad things happen, well, that’s what settlements and payouts are for, right? That private industry can monitor and police themselves.

Well, as we’re all seeing now, this particular industry apparently did NOT police itself very well and it seems that they cut corners in safety to increase revenue. Eleven people paid the ultimate cost with their lives and thousands, if not millions, of others will pay the cost with their livelihoods. This doesn’t even take into account the countless creatures of land, sea, and air who rely upon the waters of the Gulf for their survival.

Now, 50+ days after this oil spill began, we’re still seeing thousands of gallons of oil being spewed into the Gulf, furthering damage for years to come.

Now, I ask you. If you owned a hall that people rented out, and a company rented it but trashed it, you’d be mad. You’d want it fixed. But this is a company that uses your hall ALOT. So losing them would lose a lot of revenue. So wouldn’t you tell them that they had better fix what they broke? And wouldn’t you make them pay a bigger deposit next time?

To me, that’s exactly what President Obama did with BP. He had the audacity to actually hold BP responsible, to make them set aside funds to fix what they broke if they wanted to continue working in the US. Makes perfect business sense to me.

But a member of congress today actually apologized to BP for them having to be held responsible. I beg your pardon?

As a Pagan, I’m appalled.

I’m appalled at the attitude of domination that we humans still have over Nature. That Nature is there to be bent to our wills, instead of realizing that we are but a small part of Nature and should respect and revere it.

But I’m extremely appalled at the attitude that the company responsible for this disaster shouldn’t actually be held responsible.

Paganism teaches that we are ALL responsible for our own actions. We don’t have an evil overlord on whom to blame for our failures and mistakes. We know that a plea for forgiveness is great, but that doesn’t release us from our responsibility to make things right.

Some might say that these statements are an attempt to “turn the other cheek.” In my opinion, there’s a cheek being turned alright. But it’s not in the upper half of the anatomy and BP is the one whose cheek is being embraced.