Solstice Series Ends; Wicca Series Begins

Every Monday, Wednesday and Friday in December we will be asking people questions about Paganism and Pagan religions and culture. Want to weigh in? Find the next question at the bottom of this post!

Why do you think Paganism has had a revival over the past 100 odd years? Is it simply due to the decriminalization of Witchcraft and divination? After 1500 years of oppression, why now?

Selena Fox responds:

The eternal Pagan Spirit of attuning to and communing with the spiritual dimensions of Nature, on this planet and beyond, has been part of the human experience across a variety of cultures and places since the most ancient of times.  As humankind grows in numbers and diversity and becomes more interconnected in this digital age, it is important that humans find ways to be in better relation with each other and with the Circle of Nature as a whole.  The Pagan resurgence is a way of helping to meet global and universal needs.

Contemporary Paganism, with its roots in the lore and customs of Nature religions and civilizations of ancient Europe and the Mediterranean, now has branches growing in many nations around the world.  The emergence of the internet and cyber communications has helped Paganism grow in scope, numbers, and influence in recent decades.  The development of festival communities, land projects, and publications also have aided Paganism’s growth and development.

Contemporary Paganism, which is a tapesty of diverse traditions and forms, is thriving because it is providing spiritual nourishment and a home for those needing spiritual paths that are holistic, celebratory, interactive, and flexible, and that honor both science and mysticism as ways of knowing, embrace equality and diversity of gender and sexual orientation, and are environmentally relevant and sustainable.

May Paganism continue to grow and prosper in 2011 and beyond.   And may there be more understanding, respect, and collaboration among Pagans of many paths, and among Pagans and those of many faiths and philosophies!

YouTube Preview Image

Apuleius Platonicus responds:

In 1755, Jean Jacques Rousseau published his Discourse on Inequality, in which he argued that equality is the natural state of humanity, while inequality is something artificially imposed by human beings upon each other. This sentiment was echoed 21 years later when American Independence was announced to the world with the declaration that “all men are created equal.” Four score and seven years later, Abraham Lincoln emphatically rededicated the United States to “the proposition that all men are created equal.”

But a century after Lincoln’s speech, inequality was still the law of the land. And despite significant progress since then, genuine equality remains an aspiration that we continue to strive for, rather than an accomplishment we can boast about.

The Enlightenment (exemplified by Rousseau and Jefferson), was not only a time when the ideal of human equality was declared. It was also a time when a full-throated critique of Christianity began to be heard openly in the western world for the first time in 1500 years.

As with human equality, it has been a long, difficult, and still incomplete journey from articulating the rejection of Christianity to making that rejection a reality. But we are getting there. I don’t think it is any coincidence that the same historical period (“the 60s”) that gave birth to social movements intent on finally eradicating, once and for all, all vestiges of inequality based on race, sex and sexual orientation, was also a time when the modern Pagan revival attained never before imagined success.

Previous phenomena like Freemasonry, Rosicrucianism, Deism, Theosophy, etc, were all imperfect and incomplete attempts to break free of Christianity and to re-establish the unfettered religious freedom that was taken for granted in the ancient world. Warts and all, Wicca and the other forms of Paganism that have arisen since the middle of the 20th century are significant improvements over those earlier efforts.

The tremendous religious freedom, and the resulting incredible range of religious diversity, that was characteristic of ancient Paganism is the goal toward which modern Paganism, properly understood, continues to struggle. Paganism is not yet another rival religious sect to be placed alongside Christianity, Islam and the other so-called “great religions”, much less is it a “New Religious Movement” akin to Raelianism, Scientology, etc. Rather, Paganism is simply what people do naturally, in terms of religion, when we are free to do as we please.

Freedom and equality are not imposed according to someone’s grand scheme. Freedom and equality are the naturally resulting conditions that exist in the absence of oppression and inequality. But if oppression and inequality have reigned overly long, then it is only with great difficulty that the natural state envisioned by Rousseau and Jefferson is discovered once again. The same kind of difficulty is evident in our still halting attempts to return to a more natural kind of religion that is free of all coercion and that naturally and spontaneously manifests the innate spirituality of homo religiosus.

But we are getting there.

YouTube Preview Image

That’s it for the Solstice Series. We really appreciate everyone who responded over the past month. We will be launching a similar series on January 3rd as part of our monthly focus on different Pagan traditions in 2011. We will be putting the spotlight on Wicca in January and here’s our first question:

What makes someone Wiccan? Dedication? Initiation? Practice? Belief?

If you’d like to weigh in just e-mail me your short response (250-500 words) before Jan 3rd. It’s sfoster at patheos.com.

Solstice Series: Doubt

Every Monday, Wednesday and Friday in December we will be asking people questions about Paganism and Pagan religions and culture. Want to weigh in? Find the next question at the bottom of this post!

Are there ever times when you doubt your spiritual path? What place and use does doubt have in your spirituality?

P. Sufenas Virius Lupus responds:

In the very best course I took as an undergraduate–a religion class my first year taught by a guest professor named N. Robert Glass, which was called “Mysticism and Ethics (Emphasis on Asian Traditions)”–I learned a great deal; but one of the statements that I most took with me occurred during my final private meeting with Prof. Glass.  I had mentioned the phenomenon of doubt in several different religious instances we studied, both in the class and outside of it, and he suggested doing a study on doubt would be really interesting and useful, because “No one has a problem believing in doubt.”  What a profound statement–even beyond the paradoxical seeming of it for some people of a religious viewpoint–!

Several years later, I heard about a book during another class on mysticism during my M.A. program, by Winifred Gallagher called Working on God, on the phenomenon she calls “neo-agnosticism,” which to some extent she defines as the need by some religious seekers to “see” rather than simply to “believe.”  I definitely identify with this viewpoint far more than many others, and to a certain extent I still have some investment in the neo-agnostic label.  I’m very wary of taking something on board religiously or spiritually simply because others say it must be so; if something is not within the realm of my own experience, I am skeptical about it, though more than willing to give others the “benefit of the doubt” when it comes to its importance or relevance in their own life.

If one’s doubt is a productive doubt, and leads to further action and a search for answers (which may or may not ultimately allay the initial doubt or doubts), I think it can be an important and indeed essential part of any spiritual journey and practice.  If, however, one’s doubt leads to a lack of initiative, a loss of hope, and a lack of action or effort, it is not useful.  The ways that doubt can urge one on to seek further and deeper or more intense experiences, or the ways in which it can make one self-critical–a skill often sadly lacking in overly credulous religious practitioners of all types–can be extremely useful and productive.  It is sad to see the “blind faith” of so many new Pagans, who have often been in revolt from whatever (usually creedal monotheistic) religious viewpoint they’ve started out in, end up either never being questioned or questioning themselves (and thus replicating the creedalism of their previous religion), or having any critical reflection shatter whatever “faith” they feel they had, when the real issue isn’t “faith” at all, but experience.  ”Faith” is not the polar opposite of “doubt.”  One can have elements of “doubt” within, beyond, and throughout a particular experience, but once doubts resolve, taking action becomes that much more possible and meaningful as a result.

YouTube Preview Image

As for me? I remember doubt playing an important role as I first discovered Paganism. When you first reach out for the religious experience in Paganism in can be a bit like feeling your way around an unfamiliar room in the dark. It takes some time to get your bearings and make out what things are. It’s an entirely new way of seeing. Doubt was critical in shaping a healthy worldview and relationship with the Gods.

Today doubt plays a different role. Although I always have some level of doubt over my path’s direction, which is to be expected of any human being, I am fairly confident and grounded when it comes to my religion. There is no doubt regarding the Gods or my worldview. This has gone beyond a religious stance I have adopted to becoming a basic part of my being. Being Pagan is no longer an idea I am testing but an integral part of myself.

Where doubt comes into play for me now is in my community, particularly the greater Pagan community. I find I am more open but also more wary nowadays when it comes to the wider Pagan community. I no longer assume people I do not have significant experience of are operating in good faith, but neither do I assume they operate in bad faith. I also am learning to take one of the sayings of my tradition to heart By Your Deeds You Will Be Known and I’m learning to doubt words until I see action to back them up. I’m also learning to doubt my own capacity until I’ve tested it. This is a bit at odds with the tentative but unclouded optimism I bore last spring. I’ve found this doubt useful, as I find how grateful I am for actions that live up to Pagan values, both my own and others, and how less stressed I am when those actions don’t match up, either to community values or stated intentions. Viewing others with a healthy level of doubt and viewing my own capabilities with more doubt, I think makes me more productive and effective, and far more grateful and appreciative of the people I work with regularly.

Perhaps it’s not the kind way to approach the community, but then, someone once told me we practice the Craft of the Wise, not the Craft of the Nice.

Last question for this series:

Why do you think Paganism has had a revival over the past 100 odd years? Is it simply due to the decriminalization of Witchcraft and divination? After 1500 years of oppression, why now?

If you’d like to weigh in just e-mail me your short response (250-500 words) before Dec 31st. It’s sfoster at patheos.com.

Do you like this interactive format? Should we start a new series for January? Let us know!