Neville Longbottom, Barack Obama, Rick Perry, Nikki Haley, Joy Behar, and Jim Wallis: The Morning Report

Friday Morning Palate Cleanser: I don’t typically link to gossip articles, but…Pretty amazing that of all the young Harry Potter actors, the one that played Neville Longbottom has turned out to be the most handsome.  By far.

In the News

1.  In debt and Election 2012 news, Governors Rick Perry and Nikki Haley argue that now is the time to “Break the Spend and Borrow Cycle.”  Paul Krugman persists in his apoplexy over the fact that anyone would have beliefs markedly different from his own.  And Charles Krauthammer comes down hard on Obama for failing to take the debt issue seriously until, well, about a week ago – at which point he began excoriating Republicans for being unserious children:

President Obama assailed the lesser mortals who inhabit Congress for not having seriously dealt with a problem he had not dealt with at all, then scolded Congress for being even less responsible than his own children. They apparently get their homework done on time.

My compliments. But the Republican House did do its homework. It’s called a budget. Itpassed the House on April 15. The Democratic Senate has produced no budget. Not just this year, but for two years running. As for the schoolmaster in chief, he produced two 2012 budget facsimiles: The first (February) was a farce and the second (April) was empty, dismissed by the CBO as nothing but words untethered to real numbers.

Obama has run disastrous annual deficits of around $1.5 trillion while insisting for months on a “clean” debt-ceiling increase, i.e., with no budget cuts at all. Yet suddenly he now rises to champion major long-term debt reduction, scorning any suggestions of a short-term debt-limit deal as can-kicking.

The flip-flop is transparently political. A short-term deal means another debt-ceiling fight before Election Day, a debate that would put Obama on the defensive and distract from the Mediscare campaign to which the Democrats are clinging to save them in 2012.

Meanwhile, Gallup has a generic Republican candidate taking an 8-point lead over Obama (Nike Gardiner sees Obama’s prospects as increasingly “precarious“).  And the New York Times has the scoop of the decade: Rick Perry was once a Democrat!

2.  It’s the unavoidable issue today.  California schools will soon begin making a special effort, as young as Kindergarten, to tell the stories of successful and influential gays and lesbians, in the same way that schools and textbooks have made special efforts to highlight the contributions of women and ethnic minorities.  At the same time, Michele Bachmann is under fire after a man claims that the clinic her husband owns has counseled gays that they could convert through prayer to heterosexuality:

Minnesota congresswoman and GOP presidential candidate Michele Bachmann is coming under fire from mental health professionals after ABC’s “Nightline” on Monday first aired a video released by gay rights group Truth Wins Out showing a therapist at a counseling center owned by Bachmann’s husband telling a gay client that he could convert to heterosexuality through prayer. Marcus Bachmann had previously denied that his counseling center offered so-called reparative therapy, which is opposed by the American Psychological Association.

3.  Allahpundit at Hot Air calls this “the most ominous pause in modern legal history.”  He also says, “It’s the first and last time we’ll ever have a chance to say, ‘Nice job, Joy Behar.’”

It’s the first and last time we’ll ever have a chance to say, “Nice job, Joy Behar.”

In the Pews

1.  Jim Wallis offers his usual good-guys-versus-bad-guys viewpoint on budget issues:

Our country is in the midst of a clash between two competing moral visions, between those who believe in the common good, and those who believe individual good is the only good. A war has been declared on the poor, and it is a moral imperative that people of faith and conscience fight on the side of the most vulnerable.

Jim is a kind man, and he means well.  We had an interview that went haywire about a year ago, when Jim denied receiving, but had received, funding from George Soros.  He said in a phone call afterward that he had honestly been unaware, and I give him the benefit of the doubt.  There were also some bad numbers that got around, as though Jim had received a much larger amount of money from Soros than he actually had.  (Well, we don’t know what individuals might have given to Sojourners, but I believe the total from Soros to Sojourners — at least back then — came to something like $325K.)  I felt bad at how much distress it brought to Jim, and I felt bad about the false numbers (at one point, BigGovernment reported Sojourners’ total budget number as the number they had received from Soros; it was quickly corrected, but the bad numbers stayed in circulation).

I was not particularly bothered that Jim received money from Soros.  What bothered me was the way he attacked Marvin Olasky of World Magazine.  He ultimately apologized, but it was the same good-guys-and-bad-guys approach he’s put across in his writing and speaking and teaching for many years.  We’re not playing cops and robbers.  Most people on both sides of the aisle are good, intelligent, compassionate people, with different ideas about what best serves the common good.  We need to move beyond these dichotomized, assail-the-motives approaches.

2.  Motherhood is a Calling, from the Desiring God folks.

3.  Sarah Pulliam Bailey on “How Christians Warmed to Harry Potter.”  Also, if you’re looking for a review of the new Potter movie, I recommend Rebecca Cusey’s review.  My feelings on the movie were a little different, though; I’ll post them soon.

Jesus and Harry Potter

Note: the following is a parody of sorts, having a little fun with the fear in some quarters that Harry Potter should lead children toward the occult.

It’s grown fashionable in recent years to write books — silly ones like Jesus Potter, Harry Christ, or God and Harry at Yale — that piggy-back on the success of the Potter series, pirouette around complicated theological issues and perform a full-twisting double-gainer dismount into big piles of cold hard cash.  I have no book to sell, but I don’t see why book-writers should have all the fun.  I have my own Harry Potter story to tell, I have a blog to tell it on, and publishers can contact me through my agent.

For many years, I was uninitiated into the mysteries of the Potterverse.  Of course, I had seen the news stories that accompanied the book releases, which mostly consisted of long lines of nerdy boy and girls waiting outside of bookstores with black glasses and striped ties.  Since Harry bears a marked resemblance to the title character of Where’s Waldo?, for some time I assumed these were Where’s Waldo? conventions — which, it seemed to me, were exactly contrary to the spirit of the entire Where’s Waldo? experience.  But no sooner had I begun to separate Harry and Waldo in my mind than I was informed by these reports that I, as a Christian, was supposed to be concerned that Harry Potter might inspire children to start sacrificing virgins and painting pentagrams on their bedroom floors.

Harry Potter's resemblance to Waldo is striking and disturbing.

Should your kids seek Harry or Jesus? Answer: Jesus!

I had never met any such Christians, but they were out there in droves, because that was all these reporters talked about.  Apparently the county franchise of Gravely Concerned Christian Parents® was keeping constant surveillance over the local goat populations, fearing bands of children might be roaming the countryside with broomsticks between their legs in search of sacrifices for someone whose name sounded like Lord Value Mart.  They had not yet caught any such nefarious bands of prepubescent children — which was surprising, because it’s not easy for ten-year-olds to run with goats slung over their shoulders and broomsticks clutched between their legs — but the local Value Mart got lots of free publicity and the cow-tipping clubs nearly went out of business for all the parents standing watch in the fields.

These reports and their solemn warnings still lingered in my memory when, on Thanksgiving 2002, I first heard Harry Potter read aloud.  I had been invited to the home of a Christian theologian, a veritable half-giant who was closer to seven than six feet in height.  This professor discussed football and beer with the same dry, languid world-weariness that characterized his lectures, but he grew animated, even giddy, when he read Harry Potter to me and to his children. He could not get over how hilarious it was that J. K. Rowling likened Hagrid’s hands to garbage-can lids.

I became Gravely Concerned myself when I saw goats and pigs watching nervously from a neighbor’s yard.  But I was anxious to make a good impression, and his children did not have that look in their eyes (you know the one) that children get when they’re about to sacrificed hoofed mammals.  So I sat and did nothing while this man whom I had previously admired endangered the spiritual welfare and eternal destiny of his children, the safety of the local goat herds and the future of mom-and-pop stores that cannot compete with Value Mart.

It was not difficult to see why his better judgment was overpowered.  Rowling has crafted every stone at Hogwarts finely and lovingly.  Filled though it is with satanic rituals like Quidditch, and with the rampant underage drinking of butterbeer, Rowling’s world is clearly the product of an endlessly fertile creativity.  (Can you say deal with the devil?  Judas K. Rowling can.  And so can your children!)  Some of her characters are archetypes, some caricatures, yet those who occupy the emotional heart are so familiar you might have known them in school.  Rowling expands the sphere of the imagination with dragons and dementors, gryphons and grindylows, yet the center always holds in universally human experiences of growing up, falling in love, facing fears, confronting death, and what it feels like to have an army of slugs erupting from your throat.

These are your children.

These are your children on Butterbeer.

So, with my moral reflexes dulled by tryptophan and a bottle of Guinness, I relaxed the spiritual musculature that protects the Christian from demonic influence.  In retrospect it’s clear Satan was at work, for even my intellectual pride softened its usual protest.  I was exchanging Kierkegaard for Kreacher, Levinas for Longbottom, Camus and Sartre for Crabbe and Goyle — and I felt no shame.  I now know I was under some sort of Confundus charm, for even Dobby seemed like the height of comic genius.  But I was led astray.  If this renowned theologian could delight in Harry Potter, then certainly I could do the same with no loss of self-respect.  Right?

Thus began my terrifying descent into Potter-mania.

The downward spiral sloped gently at first.  Like Eve tempting Adam, I told my wife that my seminary professor had read Harry Potter — approvingly! — and I even purchased the book and gave it to her.  We began to read the latest volumes of Harry Potter together at night.  It was a scene straight out of Norman Rockwell — if Norman had been a Satanist!  Picture it: the New England snow drifting past the window, the lamp shedding its light in a soft golden cone, a young couple huddled together beneath a book — as, unbeknownst to both, the fates of their stinking souls plunged downward into the belching pits of hell.  But we enjoyed following Harry, Ron, and Hermione through all the travails of adolescence.  Since my wife is of the Chinese persuasion, we laughed at Harry’s “yellow fever” crush on Cho Chang.  We laughed at all the horny Hogwartians, especially Ron and Hermione.  We even supported the entire roster of S.P.E.W. candidates in the 2006 midterm election.

Apropos of nothing.

Yet my friends began to shun me for my embarrassing behavior.  Instead of asking them to sit beside me, I reached out my hand and said Accio!  When the pastor complimented my wife on her disarming smile, I muttered Expelliarmus! and snickered.  I developed an unnatural fondness for the word “git,” I began asking my wife if she wanted to “snog.”  When a fellow student gave an incorrect answer in class, I started calling him “Neville Wrongbottom.”  And whenever I walked past goats I felt an inexplicable desire to do them violence.

Yet the downward spiral is steepest near its end.  In the summer of 2007, while conducting dissertation research at St. Olaf College in Minnesota, I hit rock bottom.  The final book in the septet was about to be released.  You might recall the frenzy of anticipation.  Children were holding séances in the streets, spray-painting pentagrams on church doors and summoning the legions of hell during their school recesses.  Reporters interviewed the Gravely Concerned Christian Parents® every night.  Farmers hired security guards, and goat’s milk hit $20 a bottle.

But in the days before the release, I was so desperate to know how the story ended that I downloaded a bootlegged copy onto the St. Olaf library computer and spent hours squinting at the hastily-scanned pages.  Soon I was suffering a Hagrid-sized headache and wandering the book stacks crying for Madame Pomfrey.  At night I clambered back into my chair and kept reading, hoping beyond hope that Harry and Hermione would survive.  (Ron could eat it, as far as I cared.)

Yet I still had plenty left to read on the day the book was released.  A giggling horde of Girl Scouts had taken possession of the campus for a conference, and the bookstore announced it would stay open until midnight in order to sell the concluding volume to the girls.

It's hard to eat a Thin Mint when your face is melting in Hades.

And so it was that I stood in line that night — the only person in the building taller than Flitwick and the only one sporting a Y chromosome — to receive my copy alongside hundreds of squealing little girls in pajamas and pigtails.  Now, of course, it grieves me that the Girl Scouts were in the service of He Who Shall Not Be Named.  Since Christians are called to speak the truth in love, I should have told the girls something compassionate like: “We’ll see how fresh your Thin Mints taste in hell!”  But instead I actually felt that we were all a part of something special together.

When I reached the cash register, the woman looked at me askance. “You don’t look like a Girl Scout.”

“Polyjuice potion,” I lied.

Even as I paid $6.66 for the book, I knew I would never tell my professors that I had fallen to impersonating Girl Scouts.  But it comforted me to imagine that perhaps my gigantic theologian friend was out there somewhere too, pretending to be a Girl Scout with a severe hormonal imbalance.

Yet finally my eyes were opened.  In a crowd of Girl Scouts as we headed out the door, I saw one girl OMG’ing her BFF on her cell phone:

“U got it 2? I’m totally siked!” wrote the girl beside me.

The reply came swiftly. “U wanna meet up to read it 2gether?”

“Totes!” The girl smiled sweetly.  ”And then we can summon Beelzebub.  Maybe burn some Bibles.”

“Eggzactly. I mean, all Jesus needed was a simple Stupefy spell and he could’ve avoided the whole cross thing.”

“A little Wingardium Leviosa and he could have floated right up outta there.  Can you imagine if he’d given Judas a Tarantallegra hex?  ROFL.”

Proof.

This began a Battle of Hogwarts in my soul.  Finally I resolved that I would never read another page of Harry Potter – except for the 253 pages I had left to read.  I had to find out which side Snape was on.  Two days later, I completed the Epilogue, set the book down, and quit cold turkey.

Now, my name is Tim, and I’m a Potter-holic.  I’ve been Potter-free for years now. I understand why parents wish to protect them from malign influences like Satan, Lord Value Mart, and Ryan Seacrest.  But we should all oppose Harry Potter, parents or not, if only for the safety of the local goat populations.

Do it for the goats, and then do it for the children.  Children don’t need HP.  They need JC.  ASAP.

Morning Report, July 31: Charity, Circumcision, Half-Brained Babies, and Virgins

[If you're looking for the Harry Potter essay, scroll down, or go here.]

1.  This essay on First Things crafts a clear and helpful distinction between charity and tolerance.  This is a part of what Kierkegaard gets at when he says that the Christian concept of love is quite different, and sometimes even diametrically opposed, to the worldly concept of love.  The worldly concept of love is to “live and let live” (that is, tolerance).  The Christian concept of love, one might say, is to be full of grace and truth.  Too often, in other words, truth is sacrificed in the name of tolerance.  As the author, Brian Graebe, writes, true charity “seeks the moral good of another even when that causes offense.”  Read the whole thing.

2.  Circumcision, what God required of the Jewish people from the beginning, is increasingly cited as helpful for the prevention of AIDS and other diseases.  I realize this remains a somewhat controversial issue, but it is interesting that many of the provisions in the Law given to the Jews turn out, we later learn, to be helpful for social and individual health.

3.  More on the fight over whether government-run health care should cover abortions with taxpayer money.

4.  Apparently Tim Tebow, quarterback for the Florida Gators and the most famous name right now in college football, is a devout believer and not afraid to speak his mind on abortion and pre-marital abstinence.  He is the first home-schooled athlete to win the Heisman trophy.

5.  Read this extraordinary story about a girl born missing half her brain, and how her brain has rewired itself so that she can live a normal life.  The human body is surely an amazing thing.

6.  There are evangelicals who believe that fetuses do not qualify as living human persons who are therefore entitled to the protection of the law.  Most evangelicals are, however, opposed to abortion.  I was impressed by the simple power of the following video, from John Piper and Desiring God:

YouTube Preview Image

I am pro-life, but I hold this position with fear and trembling, because I see the extraordinary sacrifices (though there are extraordinary joys as well) entailed in child-rearing.  I am fearful, because: What if I am wrong?  If my point of view prevailed, and I were wrong, then I would be complicit in constraining some women to dramatically change their lives rather than destroy the unborn in their wombs.  I hope that those who are pro-choice feel a similar fear.  What if they are wrong?  What if they, through their advocacy for abortion ‘rights,’ are complicit in the deaths of a million children each year?

There is almost a Pascal’s Wager quality to the issue here.  Which would you rather be wrong about?  If you’re pro-life and wrong, you have compelled many women to have children they would not otherwise have.  Most will not regret their decisions, though they will find their lives dramatically altered; and alongside the travails of child-rearing they will also have the joys.  There will be some who obtain abortions anyway–which, these days, would involve a black market in pills and not coat hangers.  Still, some would face complications and some smaller percentage would die as a result of the complications that follow from obtaining their abortion privately or etc.  On the other hand, if you support abortion and you’re wrong, then 1-1.5 million children every year are being killed.  True, they are out of sight.  Perhaps we would rather avoid the suffering we see (those already born) than the suffering we cannot see.

7.  Sounds like the Beer Summit of 2009 passed without incident.  As expected, Crowley was not about to admit to racism, and Gates was not about to admit that he had been wrong to assume racist motives on Crowley’s part.  See the roundup here.

8.  Finally, Today’s Two-Sides.  Paul Krugman does what all pundits and partisans do when their argument is not prevailing–he assumes that people are just too dumb to understand the argument.  Or, put more delicately, there is a “wall of misinformation”:

Right-wing opponents of reform would have you believe that President Obama is a wild-eyed socialist, attacking the free market. But unregulated markets don’t work for health care — never have, never will. To the extent we have a working health care system at all right now it’s only because the government covers the elderly, while a combination of regulation and tax subsidies makes it possible for many, but not all, nonelderly Americans to get decent private coverage.

On the right, Charles Krauthammer says that health care reform was felled by the Congressional Budget Office, which demolished Obama’s argument that his reforms would save money (and thus were not unwise in, but necessitated by the financial crisis).  Most interesting is Krauthammer’s claim for what will happen next:

To win back the vast constituency that has insurance, is happy with it, and is mightily resisting the fatal lures of Obamacare, the president will in the end simply impose heavy regulations on the insurance companies that will make what you already have secure, portable and imperishable: no policy cancellations, no pre-existing condition requirements, perhaps even a cap on out-of-pocket expenses.

Nirvana. But wouldn’t this bankrupt the insurance companies? Of course it would. There will be only one way to make this work: Impose an individual mandate. Force the 18 million Americans between 18 and 34 who (often quite rationally) forgo health insurance to buy it. This will create a huge new pool of customers who rarely get sick but will be paying premiums every month. And those premiums will subsidize nirvana health insurance for older folks.

Net result? Another huge transfer of wealth from the young to the old, the now-routine specialty of the baby boomers; an end to the dream of imposing European-style health care on the U.S.; and a president who before Christmas will wave his pen, proclaim victory and watch as the newest conventional wisdom reaffirms his divinity.

Is Harry Potter of the Devil? Bet on it!

I can date precisely when my dangerous dalliance with Harry Potter began.

I had seen the news stories, of course, which mostly consisted of long lines of nerdy boys and girls waiting outside of bookstores each year in glasses and striped ties.  Since Harry Potter bears a striking resemblance to the title character of Where’s Waldo?, I could not tell whether these were Harry Potter release parties or Where’s Waldo? conventions—which would, it seemed to me, be exactly contrary to the spirit of Where’s Waldo?.  But no sooner had I begun to separate Harry and Waldo in my mind than I was informed by these reports that I, as a Christian, was supposed to be Gravely Concerned about Harry Potter’s corrupting force upon children.

Harry Potter bears a disturbing resemblance to Waldo

Harry's resemblance to Waldo is suspicious and disturbing.

Wheres Waldo?  At Hogwarts.  But soon hell be burning in hell.

Where's Waldo? Hogwarts. But children should look for Jesus.

I had never met any such Christians, but they must have been out there in droves, because that was all these reporters talked about.  Apparently the county franchise of Gravely Concerned Christian Parents was keeping constant surveillance over the local goat populations, fearing bands of children might be roaming the countryside with broomsticks between their legs in search of sacrifices for someone whose name sounded like Lord Value Mart.  They had not yet caught any such nefarious bands of prepubescent children—which was surprising, because it’s not easy for ten-year-olds to run with goats slung over their shoulders and broomsticks clutched between their legs—but the Value Mart got lots of free publicity and the local cow-tipping clubs nearly went out of business.

These are your children.

BEFORE: These are your children.

These reports and their solemn warnings still lingered in my memory when, on Thanksgiving in 2002, I first heard Harry Potter read aloud.  Living in Princeton, New Jersey, I had been invited to the home of a Christian theologian of formidable reputation.  This man, towering in mind and frame (he is closer to seven than six feet in height), discussed football and beer with the same dry, languid world-weariness that characterized his lectures, as though his mind had so penetrated the mysteries of the cosmos that nothing could excite him.  Yet when he read Harry Potter, he was animated and joyful.

AFTER: These are your children on Harry Potter.

AFTER: These are your children on Harry Potter.

I became Gravely Concerned when I saw a pen of goats and pigs watching nervously from a neighbor’s yard—but I was a student who wished to make a good impression, and his children did not have that look in the eye that children get when they’re about to sacrifice hoofed mammals.  So I sat and did nothing while this man whom I admired recklessly endangered the spiritual welfare and eternal destiny of his children, the safety of the local goat herds and the future of mom-and-pop stores that cannot compete with Value Mart.

It was not difficult to see why his better judgment was overpowered.  Rowling’s writing is not without its virtues.  Every stone at Hogwarts is finely and lovingly crafted.  Filled though it is with satanic rituals like Quidditch and the rampant underage drinking of butterbeer, Rowling’s world is clearly the product of an endlessly fertile creativity.  (Can you say deal with the devil?  Judas K. Rowling can.  And so can your children.)  Some of her characters are archetypes, some caricatures, yet those who occupy the emotional heart are so familiar you might have known them in school.  Rowling spins a new world into being, yet never lets it lose its emotional axis; she expands the sphere of the imagination with dragons and dementors, gryphons and grindylows, yet the center always holds in universally human experiences of growing up, falling in love, facing fears, confronting death.

So, my moral reflexes dulled by tryptophan and a bottle of Guinness, I relaxed the spiritual musculature that protects the Christian from demonic influence.  In retrospect it is clear that Satan was at work, or at least Lord Value Mart, for even my intellectual pride softened its usual protest.  I was exchanging Kierkegaard for Kreacher, Levinas for Longbottom, Camus and Sartre for Crabbe and Goyle, and I felt no shame.  I should have known I was under some sort of Confundus charm when Dobby seemed like the height of comic genius.  But I was led astray.  If this renowned theologian could delight in Harry Potter, then certainly I could do the same with no loss of self-respect.

It was self-control that should have concerned me.  For thus began my terrifying descent into Potter-mania.

The downward spiral sloped gently at first.  My wife and I began to read the latest volumes of Harry Potter together at night.  It was a scene straight out of Norman Rockwell—if Norman Rockwell were a Satanist!  The New England snow drifting past the window, the lamp shedding its light in a soft golden cone, a young couple huddled together beneath a book—as, unbeknownst to both, the fates of their everlasting souls plunged downward into the stinking pits of the deepest bowels of hell.  But we enjoyed following Harry, Ron and Hermione through all the travails of adolescence.  Since my wife is of Chinese descent, we laughed at Harry’s “yellow fever” crush on Cho Chang.  We cheered when Ron and Hermione “snogged” at last and we supported the entire roster of S.P.E.W. candidates in the 2006 midterm election.

Yet the long tendrils of the devil where slithering around my neck.  My friends began to shun me for my embarrassing behavior.  Instead of asking them to sit beside me, I reached out my hand and said Accio! When the pastor complimented my wife on her disarming smile, I muttered Expelliarmus! beneath my breath and smirked.  I developed an unnatural fondness for the word “git” and once finished a public prayer by replacing Amen with Alohomora.  Whenever I walked past goats I felt an inexplicable desire to do them violence.

Yet the downward spiral is steepest near its end.  In the summer of 2007, when the final book in the septet was about to be released, I hit rock bottom.  You might recall the frenzy of anticipation.  Children were holding séances in the streets.  Every night reporters interviewed the Gravely Concerned Christian Parents.  Farmers hired security guards, and goat’s milk hit $20 a bottle.  Even on the campus of St. Olaf College, where I had gone to conduct dissertation research, the sulfurous smell of Wicca was in the air.

Desperate to know how the story ended, I downloaded a bootlegged copy onto a library computer and spent hours squinting at the hastily-scanned pages.  Soon I was afflicted with a Hagrid-sized headache, and I wandered the bookstacks pleading for someone to take me to Madame Pomfrey.  At night I clambered back into my chair and kept reading, hoping beyond hope that Harry and Hermione would survive.  (Ron could eat it, as far as I cared.)

Yet I still had plenty lefty to read on the day the book was released.  A giggling horde of Girl Scouts had taken possession of the campus for a conference, and the bookstore announced it would stay open until midnight in order to sell the concluding volume to the girls.

Thus it was that I stood in line that night to receive my copy alongside hundreds of squealing little girls in pajamas and pigtails.  I was the only one in the bookstore with a Y chromosome, the only one taller than Flitwick.  Christians are called to speak the truth in love, so I should have told the girls something compassionate, like: “Soon you’ll all be selling cookies in hell!”  But instead (see the extent of my sin!) I actually felt that we were all a part of something special together.

When I reached the cash register, the woman looked at me askance.  “You don’t look like a Girl Scout.”

“Polyjuice potion,” I lied.

Its hard to eat Girl Scout cookies when your face is melting in hell.

It's hard to eat Girl Scout cookies when your face is melting in Hades.

Even as I paid $6.66 for the book, I knew I would never tell my professors back at Harvard that I had fallen to impersonating Girl Scouts.  But it comforted me to imagine that perhaps my gigantic theologian friend was out there somewhere too, pretending to be a Girl Scout with a severe hormonal imbalance.

Yet finally my eyes were opened.  Standing in a sea of pink and purple pajamas as the Girl Scouts and I huddled out the door, I saw one girl OMG’ing her BFF on her cell phone, and oversaw this exchange:

“U got it 2?  I’m totally siked!” wrote the girl beside me.

“U wanna meet up to read it 2gether?” answered her friend.

The girl smiled sweetly.  “Totes!  And then we can summon Beelzebub.  Maybe burn some Bibles.”

“Egzactly.  I mean, all Jesus needed was a simple Stupefy spell and he could’ve avoided the whole cross thing.  ROFL.  I’m so glad Harry Potter has shown me the way to devil-worship.”

Stunned, I resolved never again to read Harry Potter as soon as I had finished the last book.  I had found Waldo, and Waldo was me.  It was time to find Jesus again.  Two days later I quit cold-turkey and I’ve been Potter-free for 2 years now.

All Christians should oppose Harry Potter.  They can stand up for Jesus, for the humane treatment of animals and for independent convenience stores all at once by rejecting Harry Potter, protecting the local goat populations and bringing down Lord Value Mart once and for all.

UPDATE: This review has moved on up to the main website.  Check it out at its new home.

Morning Report, Afternoon Edition

UPDATE: Harry Potter review posted here.

Since I’m still traveling today, I have to offer my Morning Report a little late.

1.  The recent sex scandal of John Ensign has (justifiably or not) brought into the spotlight “The Fellowship” or “The Family,” which is a network of evangelical Christians who seek to connect and influence people in positions of political and business leadership.  Jeff Sharlet published a book last year that was highly critical of the Fellowship, with a lot of ominous language, and Religion Dispatches hosted an interesting discussion of the group.  Especially worth reading, to my mind, is Randall Balmer’s critical review in the Washington Post.

2.  A major victory in Illinois for proponents of abortion parental involvement laws.

3.  John Yoo explains why the Bush administration endorsed warrantless wiretaps.  Yet some find recent revelations damning of the Bush administration.

4.  David Ignatius is very far from being a conservative, but he strongly objects to the way in which Congressional Democrats, and the Congress in general, are using the CIA as a political football.  I would have to agree.

5.  Some strong and sobering reflections on why so many kids go from youth groups to agnosticism in their college years.

6.  Christianity Today, on the occasion of the release of the new Harry Potter movie, offers some reflections on Harry Potter as a Christ figure.  One of the connected articles asks what Jonathan Edwards would think of Potter.  Interesting question.

(Sorry for the old pic)

(Sorry for the old pic)

I’m going to see the movie tonight; I’ll let you know what I think!

UPDATE: Harry Potter review posted here.