Does the Pro Abortion Media Really Care About Women’s Health?

Mollie, who blogs at Get Religion, wrote a post a couple of days ago that fits right in with a discussion we’ve been having here at Public Catholic.

I published two posts yesterday which revolved around the question of how much genuine concern for women the pro choice movement truly has. They have spun the whole issue of abortion as being one of women’s health care. But what do they do when abortionists ignore what is best for the health of an individual woman, sometimes to the woman’s great peril?

In addition to lobbying for and passing laws which make it possible for “medical personnel” (including midwives) who are not doctors to perform surgical abortions on women, how do they react when an abortionist actually kills a woman?

Mollie’s post takes on several pillars of the mainstream media for their reporting of the abortion death of a woman. This reporting appears to be biased to the point of deliberate inaccuracy.

If these abortion advocates (and it seems quite clear that these publications are abortion advocates) truly cared about “women’s health care” one would think that they’d be all over this story. Instead, they do their best to sweep the whole thing — along with the life of the woman — under the journalistic rug.

You can read my first post on this issue, Woman Sues Planned Parenthood for Forced Abortion and Medical Malpractice which was about Planned Parenthood forcing an abortion on a woman and then dumping her when she experienced complications here.

My second post, California Governor Signed Law Allowing Non-Physicians to Do Abortions, which describes state laws that allow medical personnel who are not doctors to perform abortions on women can be found here.

Mollie’s fine article, Mainstream media defense of abortion never rests says in part:

I once served on a jury that convicted a man of conspiracy to commit mail fraud. We all thought he did it, but we weren’t sure the government had made its case. The evidence was strong but his defense attorney had done such a good job of explaining it away or striking various aspects from the record that we almost let him off.
It didn’t work, but it almost did. His attorney did such a fantastic job that I remember thinking, “If I ever am accused of a crime, I want this man to represent me.”
And that’s how I feel about this Washington Post write-up we’ll look at shortly. My thought is, “If I ever kill someone, I sure hope the Washington Post covers for me.” Only problem with this plan (other than my fervent hope I never commit such an act) is that I think they may only provide this exculpatory service for abortionists.
Let’s first look at the story as written up by the Journal News, a Gannett publication most recently known for publishing the home addresses of legal gun owners. The piece, “Coroner: Jennifer Morbelli bled to death following abortio n,” begins:
A New Rochelle woman died of complications from a late-term abortion at a Maryland clinic, the Montgomery County, Md., coroner confirmed Wednesday.
Jennifer Morbelli, 29, a schoolteacher in White Plains, bled to death after amniotic fluid in her womb spilled into her bloodstream, said Bruce Goldfarb, a spokesman for the Montgomery County Medical Examiner’s Office.
That newspaper also has a feature about how the doctor who performed the abortion was profiled in a documentary film praising late-term abortionists .
Now, Newsday‘s piece is headlined, lengthily, “Jennifer Morbelli, New Rochelle teacher, died of complications after abortion, medical examiner says .”
The Washington Post piece, which took surprisingly long to go online (I had previously been writing about how there was no story there even many hours after it was appearing at other sites) went up late last night.
See, it takes time — and, I guess, many phone calls with abortion rights groups to get it just right — to write the story this way. Headline, of course, is “Md. medical examiner cites rare complication in death of woman after abortion .” Then we get many, many words about how this was just a freak accident and that legalized abortion on demand through all nine months of pregnancy had absolutely nothing meaningful to do with the death of this young woman (never mind the dead child, of course):
A 29-year-old woman died of natural causes after visiting an abortion clinic in Montgomery County and suffering a rare complication related to childbirth, according to an initial finding by the Maryland medical examiner’s office.
Are you freaking kidding me, Washington Post? Are you freaking kidding me? CHILDBIRTH? CHILDBIRTH?
(Read more here.)

  • Bill S

    Turn around is fair play. When a woman dies because she is denied an abortion, the pro-choice people are all over it. When one dies having an abortion, the pro-life people are all over it.

    Neither is typical and bad things happen all the time. Just as I wouldn’t stop flying because of a plane crash, I wouldn’t take a stand against legal abortion because of a freak occurrence.

  • pagansister

    I do have a very hard time with a late term abortion, unless there are medical reasons (which are too numerous to name) for it. IMO, and I’ve mentioned it before, a woman should carry to term after the 3rd month—plenty of time to decide before the 12th week. What is unfortunate is that there are women who still die having children, and my mother was almost one of those women, when she gave birth to my younger sister. However, Roe V Wade still stands and women still have a choice.

    • Rebecca Hamilton

      Pagansister, there really are no reasons for a late term abortion. After a certain point, the doctor should just deliver the baby and try to save it, no matter the mother’s situation. Abortions at this stage involve labor and delivery, so there is no reason to deliberately kill the baby, not even to save the mother’s life.

      • pagansister

        I totally agree, Rebecca, that the doctor should deliver the baby and try to save it, if a medical situation is involved with mother or child. As I said, I’m not for “late term abortions”. Already said I have a problem with abortions after the 3rd month.

        • Rebecca Hamilton

          I understand. I was just responding to your comment that there were many reasons for late-term abortions.

          • pagansister

            Appreciate your response. Must say while I’m here, that I also appreciate that you actually read the comments to your posts, and when you feel it necessary, post your feelings and sometimes more information etc. :-)

  • Pingback: Does the Pro Abortion Media Really Care About Women’s Health? – Patheos (blog) | Health News


CLOSE | X

HIDE | X