China Changes One-Child Policy. It’s Two Children Now.

Gavinlaptopmisc012

It’s a step in the right direction. 

China has announced that it will “ease” its draconian one-child policy. Now, the good government will allow families to have two children. 

I am glad they are doing this, but governments do not have any business telling families how many children they can have. Period. 

If China — or India, for that matter — wanted to “ease” the pressures that lead to aborting, abandoning and murdering baby girls, they might consider measures to change the age-old practices that created this violent discrimination. I am not talking about coercion. Rather, by addressing issues of parity in inheritance, income and opportunity, much of the “reason” for murdering baby girls would go away. 

The article below seems to say that ending the brutal murders of baby girls has nothing to do with this policy change, so don’t hold your breath for these kinds of changes. What the article implies is that China is “easing” their policy (but not relaxing their control over people’s private lives) for economic reasons. It seems the economy flourishes with a growing population to buy goods and services. 

In the meantime, I am wondering if this new policy means that now the Chinese government will knock down people’s houses and grab pregnant women off the streets to force abort them after the second baby instead of the first. 

From Reuters:

(Reuters) - China will ease family planning restrictions nationwide, the government said on Friday, allowing millions of families to have two children in the country’s most significant liberalization of its strict one-child policy in about three decades.

Couples in which one parent is an only child will now be able to have a second child, one of the highlights of a sweeping raft of reforms announced three days after the ruling Communist Party ended a meeting that mapped out policy for the next decade.

The plan to ease the policy was envisioned by the government about five years ago as officials worried that the strict controls were undermining economic growth and contributing to a rapidly ageing population the country had no hope of supporting financially.

A growing number of scholars had long urged the government to reform the policy, introduced in the late 1970s to prevent population growth spiraling out of control, but now regarded by many experts as outdated and harmful to the economy.

 

  • http://outsidetheautisticasylum.blogspot.com/ Theodore Seeber

    There is a reason why replacement rate is 2.1 children. This policy only slows demographic decline, it doesn’t stop it.

  • pagansister

    Did they finally realize that without baby girls there won’t be any women to make baby boys! ?

    • SisterCynthia

      *snort* You’d think that’s fairly obvious, wouldn’t you? This article makes it sound like it’s largely about the money, tho. :( However, if they were really thinking about the good of their society, they might consider that It’s not a recipe for a functioning society to have a large number of those who would be wives and mothers raised in orphanages, never learning how marriage/parenting/trust works from their family because their parents dumped them in hopes of next time getting a son. I wonder what sorts of problems they are starting to notice, after a few decades of this policy. Not that their govt will ever say “we were wrong to do this…” no govt does that, and least of all dictatorial ones.


CLOSE | X

HIDE | X