This falls into what my grandmother would call the if-that-don’t-beat-hens-apeckin’-on-a-hot-griddle column.
Evidently, homebuilders are moving away from labeling the main bedroom in a house the “master” bedroom.
They think it’s sexist. Or maybe it’s heterocentric. Or … maybe they’re nuts.
Personally, I’m leaning toward nuts.
If you want to see some sexism, take a gander at a post I put up this morning called Where are all the good people dead: In the Heart or in the Head? Now that’s sexism. Also misogyny, and hatred of women, and deadly deep sinful hatred of humanity, all rolled into one.
But … “master bedroom??????” I don’t think so.
However, after all that grimness in the earlier post, it is kind of fun to talk about, isn’t it?
From Yahoo Homes:
Has the “master bedroom” ruled the roost for long enough?
Evidently so, according to Washington Business Journal writer Michael Neibauer. His informal survey of 10 major D.C.-area home builders found that six of them are instead using phrases like “owner’s suite” or — and this one just slays me — “mastre bedroom” in their floor plans.
“Why? In large part for exactly the reason you would think: ‘Master’ has connotation problems, in gender (it skews toward male) and race (the slave master),” Neibauer writes.
He found evidence of a trend among listing agents too. The vice president and managing broker of Long & Foster Real Estate Inc., Lorraine Arora, told him that her office is split on the issue. Younger agents “want to be more politically correct,” she said, whereas older agents generally stick with “master.”
I asked the National Association of Realtors about this apparent shift. Spokesperson Sara Wiskerchen told me: “While this hasn’t become a widespread trend, we have heard that some real estate brokerages have shied away from using certain phrases that may carry negative connotations. Realtors are strong advocates for homeowners and strive to be respectful of and sensitive to the needs and concerns of their clients.” (Read more here.)