Conversion As An Act of Kindness

Conversion to Judaism is noble process that represents a person’s desire to find shelter under the wings of the Divine Presence as manifested through the unique pathway of the Covenant at Sinai.1 For a long period of Jewish history it took quite an exceptional person indeed to seek out conversion to Judaism. Jews lived in bitter and harsh conditions, suffering persecution and discrimination at the hands of almost every country they found themselves in. Hence, the Talmud teaches that when a person comes to convert, one makes it very clear to them how hard it is to be a Jew in the contemporary world.2

It is only within the modern context of the time that we are living in, that the Jewish community finds many people at its door desiring a relationship with God through Torah and a life of mitzvot.3 What framework are we to view the act of conversion? Is it an onerous act leading to a life of burden and obligation? Are we to view it solely in a negative framework?

Rabbi Joseph Soloveitchik zt”l offers a different paradigm for viewing conversion.4 It is one that I believe reflects the reality that we occupy and the world that we live in. Rabbi Soloveitchik begins by quoting the Midrash on the Book of Ruth in asking:

R. Zeira said: This megillah [of Ruth] does not come to determine impurity or purity, prohibited or permitted acts, so why was it written? In order to teach us the great reward for acts of kindness.5

Yet, Rabbi Soloveitchik points out that we do indeed learn a great deal of legal material from the Book of Ruth, namely, the foundational legal principles for conversion itself!6 Rather, it must be that what we learn from the Book of Ruth has less to do with the foundational legal principles for conversion and more the definition of the nature of conversion itself. We learn from the narrative of Ruth that conversion is primarily an act of benevolence, an act of loving kindness.

Boaz, a man who would eventually come to protect and shelter Ruth, declares the following upon discovering Ruth working towards protecting and sheltering him: “May you be blessed of the Lord, my daughter; your latest act of kindness is greater than the first… (Ruth 3:10)” It is clear what her most recent act of kindness was that Boaz refers to, but what was her first act of kindness?  Rabbi Soloveitchik explains that her first act of kindness was the benevolence she bestowed upon herself by drawing close to God through conversion.

Conversion is, and will always remain, about an acceptance of the “yoke of Torah” and the “yoke of the commandments.” It is, and will always remain, about becoming a part of the life of the Jewish people and accepting the fate of the collective Nation of Israel as the same as the fate of one’s self. However, the turn of time and the present reality have made it possible for many more people to see Judaism positively and grasp its transformative power to better their lives and their connection to God. This is a tremendous blessing and we ought to view conversion within this framework presented by Rabbi Soloveitchik as an act of loving kindness, as a gift bestowed upon those who choose to accept it.7

Footnotes:
1. An example of this formulation can be found in the Rambam in Hilchot Issurei Biah 13:4
2. Babylonian Talmud, Yevamot 47a
3. May one convert without intent to keep mitzvot?, Rabbi Shlomo Brody, Jerusalem Post
4. Hararei Kedem, section 127
5. Rut Rabbah 2:16
6. For an example, see Rut Rabbah 2:22
7. For more on my perspective on conversion see my other blog post on the subject Conversion: The Need for Orthodox Leadership

Is George Zimmerman Jewish?

If one begins typing into Google Is George Zimmerman… the first suggestion that pops up is Jewish. The question of the Jewishness of the man who shot to death Trayvon Martin in Florida seems to be a quite popular inquiry. Indeed, news outlets from The Washington Post to Tablet Magazine have considered the question. This, however, is by far missing the point. In fact, it is as far from the point as is possible.

There are many debates to be had about this constantly evolving case. One could discuss the ethical dilemmas of a “Stand Your Ground” law or the applicability of that law to this situation. Yet, the religious, ethnic or racial backgrounds of Mr. Zimmerman or Mr. Martin should not be the focus of the conversation. It is very tempting to turn the entire situation into a battleground for racial, religious, socio-economic or ethnic tensions. Perhaps, a productive conversation could be had later, once this case has been resolved in our legal system, on stereotyping and assumptions we make about others upon observing their behavior, clothing or surname. This, however, is not the appropriate time for that.

The only truly salient points to consider at this juncture are the facts of the case and the applicability of the law to the facts. Is George Zimmerman Jewish? It’s possible but it is also entirely irrelevant.