The End Is Rear

Someone found their way to my blog after searching for the phrase “proctology and eschatology”. Apparently some people really are fascinated by everything to do with the end.

I’m guessing it was a typo and the person was actually looking for information on protology and eschatology. Still, that’s quite a typo!

What amazes me most is that it brought them to my blog – I’m pretty sure this is the first time the word “proctology” has appeared on it…

"That makes perfect sense to me! ^_^ Anyone else agree?"

Satan against Satan
"From what I've read, the "Satan" referred to in the gospels developed in Second Temple ..."

Satan against Satan
"This reminds me of Amy-Jill Levine's mention of the ancient Hebrews' apparent aversion to category ..."

Satan against Satan
"The effects of demonic powers on humanity are interesting in the NT. As best as ..."

Satan against Satan

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • “The End Is Rear.” Almost peed my pants.You could also say, “All them ungodly sinners are gonna get it in The End.” 😉

  • BSM

    I’d comment more but I’m already “behind”.

  • Okay, I’ll bite: I searched both wikipedia and the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy for “protology,” and came up empty. What is it?

  • The study of “first things” (i.e. the “other end” from eschatology).

  • maybe it was a double typo where eschatology was supposed to be scatology.

  • LOL

  • What amazes me most is that it brought them to my blog – I’m pretty sure this is the first time the word “proctology” has appeared on it…Nope: http://exploringourmatrix.blogspot.com/2008/09/christian-fundamentalism-views.html (in one of the comments).

  • Incidentally, the link to the paper by Dabney is broken. Having gone to the place it was presumably meant for, I am much impressed. Perhaps your Mystery Searcher had read Dabney and was looking for more information?