Skepticism Around the Blogosphere

I began this post wanting to share the news that the forger of the lead codices has admitted that they are fakes – but David Elkington is claiming that his are real. See Steve Caruso’sJoel Watts’Jim Davila’s and Tom Verenna’s posts on the subject for all the details.

Elsewhere in the skeptical blogosphere, Joe Felsenstein points out that criticisms of Dembski’s No Free Lunch continue to be ignored by proponents of Intelligent Design.

John Wilson emphasizes that no one takes the Bible literally (HT Danut Manastireanu).

Arni Zachariassen explains why Christianity goes on the internet to die.

Jim West shared James Watts’ article on whether the narrator in Job is unreliable (and also told Ken Ham to shut up!)

Finally, a piece in today’s New York Times focuses on why eyewitnesses are unreliable.

"When it comes to the biblical data on "issues," I agree with you. Progressives as ..."

Not Loving the Bible
"Sorry for the delay in replying. I'm not sure that there is any one article ..."

Come Sunday
"'but if you won’t let them express themselves freely, but force them to say only ..."

Not Loving the Bible
"I saw it; very good! :-)"

The Bible (TL;DR Version)

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment