Use of Drug Disturbingly Common

I debated whether this was something appropriate to mention on my blog or not, but in the end I have decided to do so.

I was rather shocked by a recent instance of blatant, public drug use, without apology or apparent shame.

Someone whom I deeply respect and admire, a person of profound moral conviction, right before my eyes and those of everyone who is his friend on Facebook, used “drug” as though it were the past participle of “to drag.”

What should one do? Will I be complicit if I just blog about it but don’t say anything to the person in question? Will I just be pretending if I think I can carry on as usual and not have it affect the way I think about that person?

Or should I just forget about it and recognize that there, but for the grace of grammar, goes me?

At the very least, I can end this post with a plea: Say No To Drug!

"So Jesus's personal apocalyptism is debated, but I don't think it's debated that he was ..."

Gaps in Jesus’ Fossil Record?
"Yes, the apocalypticism is debated, and I did try to couch my descriptions with 'something ..."

Gaps in Jesus’ Fossil Record?
"I checked out the always useful Wikipedia page on the historical Jesus, and it said, ..."

Gaps in Jesus’ Fossil Record?
"What a fascinating and thought-provoking session!How does the Talmud illustrate distracted reading? I take it ..."

Liquid Scripture at #AARSBL17

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Brad

    That’s a drag.

    (Thank-you. I’ll be here all night, folks!)

  • Jim Linville

    What a boring post. A total drug. Complete druggery.

  • spinkham

    You are a huge nerd.

    And that’s why I read your blog, so keep it up. 😉

    • http://www.patheos.com/blogs/religionprof/ James F. McGrath

      Thanks for the compliment!

  • markhh

    *shrug* I have no problems with “drug”. In the end, grammar books are descriptive, not prescriptive.

    But don’t get me started on “lit” vs “lighted” :)