Debatable

Fred Clark has a great post on magic tricks and the art of debate, which he starts off by saying ““Debate” is a parlor trick.” Here is a sample:

When Ray Comfort challenges someone to a debate over the truth of Christianity, I wince because I am a Christian and I know that Comfort is most likely going to “lose” that debate, leading some to the mistaken conclusion that this indicates something meaningful about the truth or untruth of what I believe. When William Lane Craig challenges someone to a debate over the truth of Christianity, I wince because I am a Christian and I know that Craig is most likely going to “win” that debate, leading some to the mistaken conclusion that this indicates something meaningful about the truth or untruth of what I believe…

“Debate” can carry you only until you encounter a situation in which your tricks don’t matter. Or until you encounter someone who knows better tricks than you do.

Click through to read the rest, including what he considers to be more important skills than those of winning debates.

"You're right, of course. There's nothing in Paul that points to the distinction Carrier is ..."

Earl Doherty as Christian Reformer
"Right I found my copy, I was mixing up two mythicist theories. But Carrier's account ..."

Earl Doherty as Christian Reformer
"Curious what Carrier's evidence for this distinction would be."

Earl Doherty as Christian Reformer
""Your correspondent is not getting Carrier's view across. If I remember it correctly, Carrier suggests ..."

Earl Doherty as Christian Reformer

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • x x

    Some debaters — perhaps W.L. Craig among them — aren’t there primarily to win, but to propagate ideas. Which seems to me to be a worthy aim.