Literalism upon Literalism

This is a literalistic depiction of a literalistic understanding of Matthew 21:7, which reflects the author of that Gospel taking Zechariah 9:9 literally.

 

"You're right, of course. There's nothing in Paul that points to the distinction Carrier is ..."

Earl Doherty as Christian Reformer
"Right I found my copy, I was mixing up two mythicist theories. But Carrier's account ..."

Earl Doherty as Christian Reformer
"Curious what Carrier's evidence for this distinction would be."

Earl Doherty as Christian Reformer
""Your correspondent is not getting Carrier's view across. If I remember it correctly, Carrier suggests ..."

Earl Doherty as Christian Reformer

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Gary

    From post “dynamic duo”, Wayne Coppin,
    http://www.tyndalehouse.com/Bulletin/63=2012/07_Coppins-16.pdf
    I find it interesting. But I can’t help but think, “wow, 16 pages on a subject”. Perhaps Matthew mis-spoke, or the Monty Python hypothesis, cheese makers versus peacemakers. BTW, Monty Python reunion. I love them, but “old” is hard to recover from. I hope it is good, and not a reminder of “old”.

    • http://timebottle.weebly.com/ Beau Quilter

      I just read this too! Following from James’ post including Wayne Coppins in the Dynamic Duo (see, James, we do pay attention). I found it very helpful, not just for Wayne’s interpretation of the verse, but also for the summary of previous scholarship.

      I do think that Wayne is being very generous toward “Matthew” when he says that the two animal prophecy is a product of his “exegetical practice, i.e. in his word-for-word reading of Zechariah 9:9”. It seems pretty obvious to me that “Matthew” didn’t understand the Hebrew synonymous parallelism in the verse and misapplied it.

  • Peter Kirby

    This is wrong. The colt, a young horse, should be on top of the ass.

  • edwardtbabinski

    This discussion of Matthew’s blooper is damn funny:
    http://www.landoverbaptist.net/showthread.php?t=73939

    • Andrew Dowling

      That has to be parody . . .right? . . . .RIGHT???

      • http://www.patheos.com/blogs/religionprof/ James F. McGrath

        Yes, Landover Baptist is a parody site.

  • Charlie Rizzo

    Learn Koine…..grammar is a bitch.