Scholars Discussing Paul

Fortress Press featured the above video on its website, which has N. T. Wright, Richard B. Hays, and Michael Gorman talking about Paul’s letters. The website also has a discussion guide as well as a couple of other videos.

"Yes, this is the view I was opposing. It's like reading a protestant minister, despite ..."

Mythicists Shock Bart Ehrman, Set Off ..."
"If Ehrman is right and Jesus' corpse was not handed over by special request to ..."

Mythicists Shock Bart Ehrman, Set Off ..."
"I did a little research and found out that Bart Ehrman disagrees with Dale Allison's ..."

Mythicists Shock Bart Ehrman, Set Off ..."
"Ok, I was wrong about Joseph, Jesus, and the reconciliation thing. My bad, lol"

Mythicists Shock Bart Ehrman, Set Off ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship Censored

    N.T. Wright seems to be the new C.S. Lewis. If a right proper Brit can swallow this stuff, then, by jove, we’ve got to keep up appearances.

  • Just Sayin’

    Personally, I think that trying to find a consistent dogmatics in Paul’s writings is a futile exercise. Much better to accept that there is none. Then there’d be no more need to churn out thousand-page doorstops trying to formulate one!

    • Jlr

      And…this is why you “publish” on the comments section of a blog.

      • Just Sayin’

        Was that an attempt at a putdown?

        • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship Censored

          It’s the only way to protect the illusion of consistent Pauline dogmatics.

          Instead of barking, one may meow to defend catmatics.

          😉