Star Trek: Discovery

I can see why the discussion arose about whether one can mention God on Star Trek. When they seem to be lost on a desert world, Michael Burnham (Number One) says “Ye of little faith.” And discovering a Klingon beacon, Commander Burnham talks about sculpture as “sacred.” Such elements, voiced by someone who was raised in a Vulcan environment, are fully in keeping with the original series’ willingness to make room for Vulcan spirituality and the occasional passing reference to Christianity. This also provides an answer to a question someone asked recently: in the future that Star Trek depicts, the liberal arts are alive and well. Adherence to religion may be less widepread or perhaps just less outwardly visible, but people continue to study it, at the very least.

Here are some other thoughts about the new series, which occurred to me as I watched it:

When T’Kuvma speaks of a Klingon crusade for self-preservation, that sounds so very unlike the Klingons of TNG to me. But there is also mention of Klingon terror raids, suggesting that we are seeing a time before TOS, when the Klingon ethos related to battle does not yet have the for, that it would soon come to take in every aspect.

The Klingons talk of prophecy, doubt towards “fables” and whether other Klingons will respond to a fall based on them, and being worthy not by blood but by faith. All of that is obviously of interest from the perspective of religious studies, and merits further exploration.

Burnham tells a StarFleet admiral that it would be a mistake to confuse culture with race. It raises the question of whether making assumptions based on culture is fundamentally different.

Sarek says, “How rare to encounter one’s demons in the flesh.” Burnham’s parents were killed by Klingons.

The first episode ends with numerous Klingon ships coming out of warp in response to the beacon. The second picks up there, indicating that there are 24 vessels, corresponding to 24 houses of the Klingon empire, suggesting that someone is trying to unify that empire against StarFleet. This seems an odd idea – can it be an empire and yet in such disarray? The Klingon who calls them to unity, T’Kuvma, says that their purity is a threat to their federation, Their slogan is “Remain Klingon.” The Klingons then attack the Federation ships (reinforcements had arrived by this point).

There had been speculation prior to these episodes airing about whether Michael Burnham is transgender, but we learn in the second episode that the captain uses female pronouns in referencing the First Officer.

As Michael is in the brig, she has a vision of Sarek, who says that his katra (the Vulcan concept equivalent to our idea of a “soul”) is still connected to hers.

The admiral makes an offer of a cease fire from aboard the Europa. But T’Kuvma uses a cloaked ship to destroy the Europa. T’Kuvma claims to be Kahless reborn. Michael describes him as having declared himself the next Klingon messiah. T’Kuvma shows concern to reclaim the slain floating in space and entomb them with his own hands.

The captain quotes Sun Tzu at one point, and they later use the fact tbat tbe Klingons are claiming their dead to get a photon torpedo onto the Klingon ship and damage it. They beam aboard to try to take T’Kuvma captive rather than making him a martyr. But in the fighting he is killed, as is the captain. The episode ends with Michael Burnham sentenced to life in prison, stripped of rank.

For a fuller summary of the two first episodes, see the post on IO9.

What did you think of Star Trek: Discovery? Given the high standard to which I hold Star Trek, I found it on the whole enjoyable and promising. In many ways, I think that honest fans will agree that it is better than some aspects of the original series, which was not consistently great although it had very many truly exceptional moments. And so I am looking forward to more episodes, which promise to have elements of J. J. Abrams’ version of the franchise (complete with lens flares), but with much more focus on principles of StarFleet, character interaction, and long-term plot development than the cinematic framework can afford.

"That the only thing I have been addressing here is the historical James. I have ..."

Earl Doherty as Christian Reformer
"Thanks for catching that and pointing it out to me!"

Atheist Reindeer Conspiracy
"Surely it is the flying spaghetti monster shorn of a few arms.btw I think you ..."

Atheist Reindeer Conspiracy

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Brad Matthies

    Would the CBS paywall that limits access to ST: Discovery jive with Roddenberry’s Utopian vision? I think not.

    So far I’ve not paid out of principle.

    Content has become too segregated and each provider charges for access.

    However, resistance may be futile (on my part)…

    • John MacDonald

      I just tried to watch episode 1 on my DVR and found out there was 30 minute series introduction before episode one started, so my DVR only recorded the first half of the episode. Very disappointed :(

  • Mike Poteet

    I have only seen the first episode, but enjoyed it a lot. It is certainly the most visually sumptuous and ambitious Trek (on big or small screen) we’ve ever seen. It’s cinematic, yes, but I think they’re doing things with visual imagery that Trek hasn’t really done before. The recurring emphasis on the eye (unintentional echoes of Matthew 6.22, perhaps)? The character development is on slow burn so far (except for Burnham)… and I’m a little confused at how someone as timid as Saru has advanced so far in Starfleet… but I am assuming they’ll all be fleshed out a lot over 15 episodes of a serialized story. My only complaint is the anemic opening credit sequence — hey, look, a phaser! A communicator! Odd choices. But on the whole I was quite pleased and looking forward to more! Thanks for your blog about it – will you be weighing in each week?

    • http://www.patheos.com/blogs/exploringourmatrix/ James F. McGrath

      That’s my hope!

      I suppose that the more timid alternate version of Picard we saw when Q gave him the opportunity consider a different life path suggests that science offers can indeed have those characteristics! :-)

      • Mike Poteet

        Fair point, and that occurred to me, too — but “Tapestry” also shows that timid officers don’t make it to bridge crew service!

        I will look forward to the ongoing discussion!

  • http://batman-news.com Scott

    I am enjoying “Discovery” a lot. They are doing a lot of good things. The first two episodes are prologue for Burnham’s character and establishing the part of the Trek timeline that it is part of. While the desert scene had a bit of “info dump” exposition, it was a nice introduction to Georgiou and Burnham’s character’s and their relationship. It will be interesting to see how they evolve the Klingons over the series. They’ve always skirted the war part with the Klingons, mainly mentioning it or getting close. The longest war part of Trek was the Dominian War in DS9.

    I am enjoying the look of “Discovery” and it’s bringing Trek into the “Game of Thrones” era of TV drama. They’ve also done a good job of working around Roddenberry’s rule of no conflict in the crew. “Discovery” very much feels like Trek to me, but then I’m hardcore.

    As far a paying for the show, it’s not really any different that paying for HBO to get GOT. And with the sign ups that CBS got, second and more seasons should be a go.