RoboChrist and Robotic Ethics

RoboChrist and Robotic Ethics September 22, 2018

I feel like I need to comment on the Daily Show’s sketch RoboChrist, since it intersects with a number of topics that interest me: the intersection of religion and science fiction on the one hand, and religious freedom on the other.

But let’s be honest at the outset. It’s not particularly funny. It would probably have worked better if they had brought Donald Trump’s proposed Space Force into the picture and made some sort of parody at the imagined intersection between that and so-called “religious freedom” measures.

And for those interested in exploring the idea of “RoboChrist” in its own right, there is a lot there to be explored that is a lot more interesting than what is in the sketch. See my 2014 blog post “RoboChrist” (borrowed from the title of a blog post elsewhere that prompted my own post) for some of what’s out there.

But I suppose what I should say about the matter is this. On the one hand, the fact that such a parody can be freely made and circulated illustrates that religious freedom – including the freedom to critique and criticize the religious views of others – is safe and sound in the United States. And on the other hand, this kind of cheap swipe at religious conservatives is likely to do little more than reinforce in their minds the sense that they are under attack in this country and actually need new laws, if not new robot enforcers thereof, to protect them.

Of course, the key issue in our time is not such criticism, even if unfunny and in poor taste, but conservative doublespeak use of “religious freedom” as a way of denoting the privilege of restricting the freedom of others and imposing their beliefs on them. The big danger at the moment is that legislative measures that claim to protect religious freedom will be used as part of efforts to reduce the freedom of minority groups.

Although my current research project about robots and ethics may seem to have little direct intersection with the subject of this post, deeper connections are there not far beneath the surface, branching off in a variety of directions. In addition to the key point about adjudicating between competing values, see the CACM article on using sci-fi to teach real world computer ethics, the piece about robot peer pressure’s effects on children, the New Scientist article about how a robot boss might help you concentrate (along with their earlier one about a robot debater), and coverage of how the Church of England is turning Alexa into a prayer assistant.

I suppose the takeaway is that just as rather stupid comedy sketches may still have something about them that deserves serious discussion, how much more so do as yet not truly intelligent computers and robots nevertheless have serious implications for our ethics and our societies that deserve our attention? The relevance of machines to ethics and theologies of work already in the present day is just one relevant example among many…

 

"Thank you so much for finding this! A reverse image search on the small piece ..."

Defining Evil and Unmasking Monsters
"in the face of an evil that conceals its true nature all too wellUnless I've ..."

Defining Evil and Unmasking Monsters
"I loved the episode overall. The writing (by the prolific black, British writer, and former ..."

Doctor Who: Rosa
"I like the new Doctor herself but don't really care for any of the episodes ..."

Doctor Who: Rosa

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • John MacDonald

    On the one hand, the fact that such a parody can be freely made and circulated illustrates that religious freedom – including the freedom to critique and criticize the religious views of others – is safe and sound in the United States.

    I for one greatly appreciate sites like this one where I can attempt to express and defend my secular worldview, as well as appreciate the views of others in the “spirit” of coexistence, pluralism, and multiculturalism.

  • Brandon Roberts

    tough one.