…Well, since you brought it up, I don’t see it as odious (as some have) that I changed my mind about the field. Part of it involved doing more reading about it, and teaching it, but most of it I attribute to the fact that the early excesses of evolutionary psychology have been tempered as the field has started policing itself.
I think he’s got exactly the right attitude there. It’s no big deal to re-examine areas of science when presented with new data. That’s a healthy way to be! He then offers a gentle explanation explaining the discrepancy one would find in his statements from even a year ago. It seems that field has undergone some relatively recent quality controls, and that’s the main reason why he’s on board now.
For me, I always ask myself, “What evidence would I need to change my mind about X?” Then I try to find that evidence, or how my ‘opponents’ tackle the same question. Are they using logic, reason, facts, and science? Is the science peer-reviewed? Etc.
The person who linked Coyne to my post has a very similar surname. I thought it was my blog spamming him because I linked to him, and I was worried! Then I was worried if he hated hearing the obvious ‘coin / coyne’ jokes, or if he resented my photoshopped image.
I bet he hears “to COYNE a phrase” a lot. He has to hate that shit. I heard “JUST IN TIME / CASE” frequently enough to detest it even as a kid. Apologies, Jerry, if you are reading this!