Trends in theology and religious studies

I’ve been spending quite a bit of time perusing the new books on display in the publisher’s booths at the national meeting of the American Academy of Religion.  Here are some trends I notice.

Books dealing with Pentecostalism have exploded on this scene.  Numerous publishers (including academic ones) have new offerings on that subject.  A leading Pentecostal theologian is Amos Yong who is very prolific; his books are very scholarly and I see many of them on display.  But many of the books are about Pentecostalism in non-Western countries such as Nigeria and Korea. This trend bemuses me.  Academics are seriously interested in Pentecostalism in other countries but would probably never darken the door of a Pentecostal church in their own neighborhood.  I remember when we Pentecostals were viewed with extreme suspicion and even as “cultic” by mainstream society. Most of these new books treat Pentecostalism positively as a movement of the people giving them hope and meaning in difficult circumstances.

I bought a new books by Kevin Vanhoozer entitled Remythologizing Theology: Divine Action, Passion and Authorship (Cambridge University Press).  It looks very good and I can’t wait to read it.  But I wish it didn’t cost over $100!  My own judgment, for what it’s worth, is that Vanhoozer is the most serious evangelical theologian working today.  The only problem is that most of his books are too scholarly for use as a textbook in a course (below the doctoral level).  Watch Vanhoozer and read him.  He is wrestling with the big issues of theology from what I consider a postconservative evangelical approach.

Another trend is Kierkegaard.  New books about Kierkegaard have suddenly exploded on the religious publishing scene.  Mercer University Press has a series of scholarly treatments of K.  But many other publishers have new books about his philosophy, religious life and theology.  I credit my colleague Steve Evans with being one catalyst for this new interest in K.

A counter trend is fewer new books with “Queer” in the title.

Another trend is many new books on food.  Not recipe books!  But books about the theology and ethics of food.  Some have to do with hunger, but that’s nothing new.  The new trend is books about eating.  I’m not sure what that is all about and I’m not interested enough to investigate.

What is really missing is new books by ”stand out” theologians.  There is, of course, Justification by N. T. Wright (IVP).  But otherwise, I am not seeing major works by well-known systematic theologians.  There is one small, new book by Moltmann (Sun of Righteousness, Arise!), but it is not being promoted by the publisher.  Nothing new from Hauerwas that I have seen.  (Some years ago there was a joke going around AAR about Hauerwas’ reputation for being prolific.  Says one browser to another “Have you seen Hauerwas’ new book?”  The other replied “No; what’s the title this time?”  Of course, this was said of other prolific writers as well.

Some publishers usually here are notably missing: Zondervan, St. Vladimir Press, Herald Press, Beacon Press–all publishers in whose stalls I have spent many happy hours browsing and reading chapters. :)   I saw what looked like a really interesting book in a publisher’s display. Without looking first to see who the publisher was I picked it up and read parts of it.  The table of contents looked really good.  The book was about God and the problem of evil.  Then I saw the publisher–The Swedenborg Foundation! 

My advice to those of you wanting an emerging giant to follow is read Kevin Vanhoozer.  I doubt he’ll ever grace the cover of TIME, but he ought to get more attention than he does in Christianity Today and Christian Century.  His books are not popularly written, however, and those publications now tend to focus most of their attention on popular religious figures.

  • Aaron

    Roger – Is Vanhoozer a Calvinist? Not that this should keep someone from reading him but I’m just wondering where he is coming from? – Thanks

    • http://RogerEOlson.com Roger

      I haven’t found anything in his writing that answers that question. But, then, I just purchased his most recent book Remythologizing Theology: Divine Action, Passion, and Authorship (Cambridge U. Press, 2010). Its retail cost is $125! I got it at a discount at AAR. I hope it will give me a clue about Vanhoozer’s position vis-a-vis God’s sovereignty.

      • Jonathan

        I’ve read a few interviews where he seems to place himself in the reformed tradition. Not that this means that he is a calvinist but it is suggestive! His interview with Guy Davies at The Exiled Preacher had some interesting statements to that effect (he also made reference to a forthcoming volume this year that presents his ideas in an easier to digest format as well as tantalizing hints at a volume on Systematic Theology). Regardless, he is well received by both Arminians and Calvinists. Four View on Moving Beyond the Bible was my first introduction to his thought. His essay does not read nearly as easy as the other essays. I remember it feeling like I had hit a wall. It is definately worth the effort! His interaction with the other positions is also priceless (and humorous!).

        Dr. Olson, have you had a chance to read Remythologizing and what are your impressions? I’d love to dig into this volume (too pricey!) but it will have to wait until I get to a good library.

        This is the only review that I’ve found on Remythologizing.
        (http://exiledpreacher.blogspot.com/search/label/Remythologizing%20Theology)

        • http://RogerEOlson.com Roger

          I haven’t read it yet. As soon as I do I’ll post a review here. I think Vanhoozer is THE up and coming evangelical theologian to watch.

  • http://themourningdovecaws.com Andy D

    Vanhoozer is working from a Reformed perspective. I think it will be apparent both in “Remythologizing Theolgoy” and in “Is There a Meaning in This Text?” (in which he says his hermeneutical project is a “creative retrieval of Reformed theology and speech act theory.” p. 10) Most of his bios scattered around online also say he is part of the Presbyterian tradition. I agree with your appraisal of Vanhoozer! Also, I’d love to get my hands on some ‘theology of food’ works. Can you suggest some titles?

  • http://jeffkclarke.com Jeff

    Amos Yong, among others, were invited to deliver a paper at a Pentecostal Forum I helped to organize in February 2007 hosted by McMaster Divinity College. He spoke on the topic of creating a pneumatological theology of religions and did an outstanding job. The papers were later published under the McMaster Theological Studies series from Pickwick Publications.

    A second book from a subsequent conference held in October 2008 was just released under the same banner. I think both books provide great overviews of classical and emergent themes in North American and Global Pentecostalism.

    http://wipfandstock.com/browse/series/McMaster%20Theological%20Studies%20Series

  • Calvin Chen

    I took a Systematics course from one of Vanhoozer’s doctoral students at TEDS, and I’m under the impression that Vanhoozer would self-identify with the label “Reformed” in a broad sense, especially with regard to covenantalism and God’s sovereignty. Also, he is a member of PCUSA, dialogues fairly extensively with both Barth and Van Til, and attended Westminster Theological Seminary.

    http://www.wheaton.edu/Theology/faculty/vanhoozer/index.html

  • Pingback: Inerrancy and the Incarnation | Baker Book House Church Connection

  • Coleman Glenn

    As perhaps the only Swedenborgian who regularly reads your blog (although of course I might not be), I was as shocked as you were to discover that you’d come across a book published by the Swedenborg Foundation! Was it Bruce Henderson’s new book? I haven’t checked it out yet, although I’ve been meaning to.

    Any particular book you’d recommend by Vanhoozer?

    • http://RogerEOlson.com Roger

      I don’t recall the author. The book was on God’s sovereignty and the problem of evil. As for Vanhoozer–start with The Drama of Doctrine. It’s not easy reading, but it is programmatic (as regards theological method) and stimulating.

  • http://themourningdovecaws.com Andy D

    Also, consider Vanhoozer’s attempt to reconcile the new perspective on Paul with reformed theology (for those wondering about his tradition) http://www.wheaton.edu/media/BITH/100417Vanhoozer.html