Review of New Book about Calvinism and Arminianism: Jerry Walls’s Does God Love Everyone: The Heart of What Is Wrong with Calvinism
Yesterday I was asked by bright, eager, young Christian student of theology to identify “the one major difference between Calvinism and Arminianism.” Without hesitation I identified it the way evangelical Arminian philosopher Jerry Walls does in this book (published this year by Cascade Books, in imprint of Wipf and Stock): the character of God. On page 80 Walls writes that “The deepest issue that divides Arminians and Calvinists is not the sovereignty of God, predestination, or the authority of the Bible. The deepest difference pertains to how we understand the character of God. Is God good in the sense that he deeply and sincerely loves all persons?”
I happen to know a little about the “back story” of this book (which contains a high promotional recommendation by me on its back cover). Its front cover features a picture of the now more famous than ever statue of Christ with outstretched arms overlooking Rio de Janeiro in Brazil. A few years ago I was invited by the Brazilian publisher of my books to come to that country for a speaking tour. I was unable to go and recommended they invite Walls which they did. This book contains a version of some of the lectures he gave there. The tour, both the one I did not do and his, was primarily around Brazilian Pentecostal churches and institutions. According to Walls (and I have heard this from others) Pentecostalism, especially the Assemblies of God, is the largest segment of Protestants in Brazil.
Sidebar: *The opinions expressed here are my own (or those of the guest writer); I do not speak for any other person, group or organization; nor do I imply that the opinions expressed here reflect those of any other person, group or organization unless I say so specifically. Before commenting read the entire post and the “Note to commenters” at its end.*
According to the Brazilians who invited me and according to Wells who went and spoke, “five point Calvinism” is making deep inroads into Brazilian Protestantism—including Pentecostalism including Brazilian Assemblies of God churches. Portuguese translations of John Piper’s and other North American Calvinists’ books are selling like the proverbial hot cakes in Brazil.
Back to Walls’s book….
It is a very brief, concise and succinct (only 88 pages) explanation of why five point Calvinism is “wrong.” I don’t think it adds anything to what Walls earlier argued in Why I Am Not a Calvinist (IVP, 2004) (written with Joseph Dongell) or that I argued in Against Calvinism (Zondervan, 2011). The main difference is that this book is written in a less scholarly fashion (although both other books are highly accessible to non-scholarly readers) and somewhat briefer. Of course, I would prefer that people read my Against Calvinism which I think goes into the subject more deeply—assuming they have to choose between them.
In Does God Love Everyone? however, Walls does an excellent job of driving home the Achilles Heel of five point Calvinism which is that a believer in it cannot say to any group of people or any individual “God loves you, Christ died for you, and you can be saved.” Of course, John Piper and some other five point Calvinists argue that they can say that to any group of people or to any individual. However, the “explanation” of that basic evangelistic statement, if made by a five point Calvinist, is so tortuous as to be laughable. As one five point Calvinist explained the first part of it “God loves all people in some ways but only some people in all ways.” And Piper argues that Christ’s death on the cross benefits even the reprobate—those God has predestined to hell—with “temporal blessings.” As I have said many times that amounts to giving them a little bit of heaven to go to hell in.
I do not know whether or to what extent (if any) Walls struggles with this, but I will confess that I feel the burden, even the stigma, of being identified among evangelicals primarily as “that anti-Calvinist.” That is not how I regard myself, but I understand how I have brought about that perception. My only defense is that the leaders of the “Young, Restless, Reformed Movement” and of contemporary North American aggressive Calvinism in general have been much more anti-Arminian than I have been anti-Calvinist. It’s just that they hide their anti-Arminianism within the pages of their pro-Calvinist writings. It’s not very well hidden. For me this whole project began in the early 1990s when I read the first issue of Modern Reformation magazine which blatantly misrepresented classical Arminianism and, in effect, attempted to excommunicate Arminians from evangelicalism. From there came, of course, an avalanche of anti-Arminian writings and sermons by leading North American conservative evangelicals. But they were not-very-well hidden within their pro-Calvinist titles and introductions. I won’t bore with a list of examples because I’ve mentioned them here before. I’ll just mention one. On Youtube someone seeking information about Arminianism is likely to find a documentary (not just a podcast) tracing “liberal theology” and even hedonism (!) back to Arminianism. Thoughtful, reflective viewers will laugh at its ending where the filmmakers attempt to blame Arminianism for two famous women performers kissing each other on stage at a rock concert. Unfortunately, however, many YRRM people have fallen under the spell of this virulent anti-Arminianism without making any serious attempt to understand what Arminianism really is.
My Against Calvinism and Walls’s Does God Love Everyone? are both attempts to turn the tables and irenically point out the serious flaws and defects of five point Calvinism without attempting to excommunicate Calvinists from evangelicalism. Neither Walls nor I have ever said, for example, that Calvinists can be Christians “just barely” or inquired publicly how Calvinists can be considered evangelical Christians—with an implied answer that they cannot be. We have simply attempted to demonstrate that “high Calvinism” contains inner contradictions that can have negative practical consequences and that people who believe in it must necessarily, insofar as they care anything about logic, embrace belief in a God who does not love everyone, who is not really love, and whose “goodness” is incommensurate with anything we know about goodness even from the Bible itself.
*Note to commenters: This blog is not a discussion board; please respond with a question or comment solely to me. If you do not share my evangelical Christian perspective (very broadly defined), feel free to ask a question for clarification, but know that this is not a space for debating incommensurate perspectives/worldviews. In any case, know that there is no guarantee that your question or comment will be posted by the moderator or answered by the writer. If you hope for your question or comment to appear here and be answered or responded to, make sure it is civil, respectful, and “on topic.” Do not comment if you have not read the entire post and do not misrepresent what it says. Keep any comment (including questions) to minimal length; do not post essays, sermons or testimonies here. Do not post links to internet sites here. This is a space for expressions of the blogger’s (or guest writers’) opinions and constructive dialogue among evangelical Christians (very broadly defined).