<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Roger E. Olson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 15:11:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Some thoughts about my conversation with Michael Horton</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/02/some-thoughts-about-my-conversation-with-michael-horton/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/02/some-thoughts-about-my-conversation-with-michael-horton/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 15:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rogereolson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/?p=1178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some Thoughts about My Conversation with Michael Horton             I spoke about why I am &#8220;Against Calvinism&#8221; for about 15 minutes focusing on the goodness of God and how classical, &#8220;high Calvinism&#8221; is inconsistent with any meaning of &#8220;good&#8221; and &#8230; <a href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/02/some-thoughts-about-my-conversation-with-michael-horton/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/02/some-thoughts-about-my-conversation-with-michael-horton/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Finding roots and gems in old theologies</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/02/finding-roots-and-gems-in-old-theologies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/02/finding-roots-and-gems-in-old-theologies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rogereolson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/?p=1176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the past month I&#8217;ve been immersed in nineteenth century theology: Schleiermacher, Kierkegaard, Ritschl, Hodge, Catholic Modernism (Blondel, Loisy, Tyrrell), Troeltsch, Dorner, Bushnell. It isn&#8217;t the first time, but this time I&#8217;m reading more primary texts and writing about these &#8230; <a href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/02/finding-roots-and-gems-in-old-theologies/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/02/finding-roots-and-gems-in-old-theologies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where I have a problem with Calvinism</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/02/where-i-have-a-problem-with-calvinism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/02/where-i-have-a-problem-with-calvinism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rogereolson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/?p=1174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One commenter has raised a question about my statement that I have no problem with Calvinism in confessionally Reformed circles (churches, denominations, etc.). I made that statement in my previous post about my public conversation with Mike Horton. So, let &#8230; <a href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/02/where-i-have-a-problem-with-calvinism/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/02/where-i-have-a-problem-with-calvinism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quick report on Calvinst-Arminian dialogues</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/01/quick-report-on-calvinst-arminian-dialogues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/01/quick-report-on-calvinst-arminian-dialogues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rogereolson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/?p=1171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This past weekend (Saturday, January 28) I engaged in another public dialogue with my favorite Calvinist Michael Horton. While I strongly disagree with some of his characterizations of Arminianism (e.g, &#8220;man-centered theology&#8221;) he is a gentleman and a scholar who &#8230; <a href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/01/quick-report-on-calvinst-arminian-dialogues/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/01/quick-report-on-calvinst-arminian-dialogues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And now&#8230;to the other side (on issues of gender)</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/01/and-now-to-the-other-side-on-issues-of-gender/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/01/and-now-to-the-other-side-on-issues-of-gender/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 12:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rogereolson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/?p=1169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The trouble with young men?             This is following up on my earlier posts about so-called (evangelical) complementarianism. Anyone who has followed this blog very long knows how strongly I feel about equality between men and women. I won&#8217;t repeat &#8230; <a href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/01/and-now-to-the-other-side-on-issues-of-gender/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/01/and-now-to-the-other-side-on-issues-of-gender/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On tossing out the evangelical spectrum: Part 2</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/01/on-tossing-out-the-evangelical-spectrum-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/01/on-tossing-out-the-evangelical-spectrum-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rogereolson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/?p=1167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Types of evangelical theology: replacing the “spectrum” In part one of this series I talked about the limitations of attempting to place every theologian somewhere on a spectrum defined by “right,” “middle,” and “left.” It’s a habit of evangelical theologians &#8230; <a href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/01/on-tossing-out-the-evangelical-spectrum-part-2/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/01/on-tossing-out-the-evangelical-spectrum-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On tossing out the &#8220;right-middle-left&#8221; spectrum</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/01/on-tossing-out-the-right-middle-left-spectrum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/01/on-tossing-out-the-right-middle-left-spectrum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rogereolson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/?p=1164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Types of evangelical theology: replacing the “spectrum” Part 1 For a long time scholars studying Evangelicalism have used the analogy of a spectrum to describe its theological diversity. The spectrum is always from “right” to “middle” to “left” with “middle” &#8230; <a href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/01/on-tossing-out-the-right-middle-left-spectrum/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/01/on-tossing-out-the-right-middle-left-spectrum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strong meat, not milk: Are some things impossible to believe?</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/01/strong-meat-not-milk-are-some-things-impossible-to-believe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/01/strong-meat-not-milk-are-some-things-impossible-to-believe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rogereolson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/?p=1161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are Some Things Impossible to Believe? Lewis Carroll’s White Queen tells Alice that sometimes she has believed six impossible things before breakfast. That led some later wits to quip that faith is believing six impossible things before breakfast. Lately I’ve &#8230; <a href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/01/strong-meat-not-milk-are-some-things-impossible-to-believe/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/01/strong-meat-not-milk-are-some-things-impossible-to-believe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Neo-fundamentalism (excellent but somewhat lengthy essay)</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/01/neo-fundamentalism-excellent-but-somewhat-lengthy-essay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/01/neo-fundamentalism-excellent-but-somewhat-lengthy-essay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rogereolson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/?p=1154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Below is an essay written by a friend. I have only altered it to correct spelling and mechanical errors (e.g., to put a space between words where one was missing). I judge this an incisive explanation of something significant happening &#8230; <a href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/01/neo-fundamentalism-excellent-but-somewhat-lengthy-essay/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/01/neo-fundamentalism-excellent-but-somewhat-lengthy-essay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>145</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>About &#8220;judging God&#8217;s morality&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/01/about-judging-gods-morality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/01/about-judging-gods-morality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 23:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rogereolson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/?p=1152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About “Judging God’s Morality” Recently an acquaintance asked me if I am guilty of “judging God’s morality.” He explained that his reason for asking is my answer to my student’s question “If it were revealed to you in a way &#8230; <a href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/01/about-judging-gods-morality/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2012/01/about-judging-gods-morality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 517/619 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.patheos.com @ 2012-02-05 14:10:35 -->
