Is Scientology A Religion?

Sharing an interesting article by Nick Broadhurst

This question is asked over and over by different people of differing educational standards.To answer it, we need to look at the earlier question, what is a religion? I am an Australian, and the High Court of Australia, the highest court in our nation, defined religion, and ruled most certainly that Scientology was a religion. But if this is the case, then why do people keep asking this same question? 

The answer is easy. Religion can best be described as that which answers the aged old question of what are we, where am I going, is there more to me than my physical body? These questions are ancient.

There have been two major divisions of how these question have been answered. The first is that you are a spirit something possibly still to be defined, and the other is that you are just nothing more than the clay you were said to arise from. Both have passionate debaters, and I might even suggest that the most passionate religious haters, in answering this question, simply have another religious platform they are arguing from, atheism. Yes, I would argue that atheism is a religion, as it is an attempt to answer the question of what is the cosmos and what part we play in it. But that is not the point in this article.

Getting back to the spiritual world, we find that there are two further subcategories. The first is that man is a spirit, and that he is answerable to those who speak from God. These are revealed religions. The other subcategory is the natural religion. This is whereby a man or men have tried to fathom and get answers to what is the universal law that governs man as a spirit that is, what is man, what is this

spirit, what is this life force that we all answer to as I, and how do we relate to the allness of all, or creator of creations.L. Ron Hubbard, the founder of Scientology, wrote that Scientology would be a close cousin to orthodox Buddhism. 

So when people state Scientology is not a religion, they are usually westerners stating from their own cultural viewpoint that any spiritual philosophy cannot be a religion unless it has a God acknowledged spokesperson interpreting God’s message. Of course this removes over half the worlds religious and spiritual beliefs and their members, including Scientologists.

Hundreds of years ago in the West if you had a faith that was not Roman Catholic, you did not have a religion. You were a heretic, a pagan, a heathen, and even worse. During the inquisition time many Christians were killed, not just the Jews and Muslims. The Cathars, for example, a Christians religion from north Africa, to the Balkans, up to Holland, and who believed in living again in this world, were hunted down and murdered all over Europe.

But over the centuries, the definition of religion broadened to include all Christian groups, then Judaism, Islam and finally it has generally been accepted that the eastern religions are indeed great religions of this world too.

I recall fifteen years ago being at an international religious conference in Korea. After a couple of days an American religious dignitary made the comment that Buddhists attending should not really be there as Buddhism was not a religion. The Buddhists laughed and laughed.

Such comments are aimed at my religion. But they can also happen to the members of a religion that has over a billion members.

The Scientology belief is that you are indeed spiritual. You are life and that life is something separate and outside of the physical universe. Furthermore, there is such a thing as a creator, an infinite beingness behind all creation. Scientology is an attempt to understand what we are and how we came to be here. However it is a natural religion, not a revealed religion. That is the difference.

 

Scientology–An Overview

By Nick Broadhurst:
I am often asked by tertiary [college or university] religious students who are trying to write an overview on Scientology, what is the most successful way we have of expanding Scientology. What is it that expands our membership? “Just give a quick overview.”

The answer to this question is always the same. Scientology expands mostly by word of mouth. Of course we do book promotion campaigns,Internet campaigns, street fliers, letterbox drops, and more. But nothing compares to the expansion by word of mouth. Word of mouth is the simple biggest expansion point of Scientology.

As covered in the book Scientology: A New Slant on Life, the true story of Scientology is: someone developed a philosophy of life and death. Others find it interesting, people find it works, they then pass it on to others and it grows. That should be all there is to it. A two line overview.

However there is more. If people were to get better and Scientology was to achieve its aims, such would include a world without war, without insanity and without criminality, then a lot of people with vested interests in insanity, war and criminality, could be in the unemployment line.

To be sure, here is one of the biggest industry on earth, the pharmaceutical industry. It would either have to close down or change its operations, maybe even concentrate on beneficial food supplements. This might even spell the end of fictional chemical imbalance of the brain theory. The pharmaceutical industry expands on mental illness and spiritual “ill-being.” If a well-meaning group were to come along and offer something that could truly rehabilitate people both mentally and spiritually such a good group could be in for a torrid time.

Some many may not benefit from such a good group’s presence, and the some many may be involved in war and criminality. Media magnates may bridge over as common boards of directors into the mental health, pharmaceutical and weapons industries. To a large degree this world, as it stands today, is ruled by these moguls and their families. To them add international banking which funds and profits by their work.

A standard way such a cartel can protect its own interests against a good group which opposes them is to make something controversial of the good group. In general, the natural therapy industry, while growing, gets a hard time from the above cartel of pharmaceutical, weapons, media and banking industries. But while the natural therapy industry stays as a cottage industry it is no real threat to them.

Scientology on the other hand is different. It is growing fast. Scientology’s
Founder
was a philosopher and a writer in many genres, such as westerns, detectives, science fiction, adventure, but the media portray something controversial about this by paralleling his non-fiction philosophy to his science fiction writing. To sell newspapers, they feel that unless they have controversy, the public will not buy their news. In Scientology we simply refer to these mongers of fear as merchants of chaos. And that is what they do, they sell chaos. It is unfortunately their stock in trade.

As an example they could write, “Scientology founder and philosopher L. Ron Hubbard….” but they do not. Instead they write, “Scientology founder and science fiction writer L. Ron Hubbard….”

Their point is to make something controversial out of writing fiction, and to attempt to stick in the mind of readers an association between Scientology philosophy and science fiction.

Factually there is none, no more than there is between Scientology and L. Ron Hubbard’s adventure stories, which he also penned. All through history the greatest philosophical minds – such as Socrates, Plato, and others, have all been great writers as well as thinkers. Being a philosopher and a great communicator of ideas seems a very natural crossover.

But fortunately the whole world is not like this.

Ten years ago I was asked to do an interview in Mysore in southern India. The paper was called the Mysore Star, and it ran a two page story on Scientology. I was surprised as the interview was not only reported accurately, but there was no controversy. Also, I had made one mistake in what I had said, the reporter had researched and fixed it up with the correct information. I then read through the rest of the newspaper. I noticed there were no bad stories, no deaths, no beatings, not one story of harm or terror. I was curious and asked the reporter why not? He looked at me very surprised and explained that they would never run such stories, as it was abhorrent to him as a journalist that he would be selling just bad news, as who would buy such a paper? That was southern India, a very refreshing spiritual world.

Now back in the materialistic West–look at the Los Angeles Times, or an equivalent Australian newspaper. They contain shock and bad news from the first page on. Bad news is stock in trade.

But back to Scientology, those who read L. Ron Hubbard’s books pass them on. They find the work. They help people.

Certainly there is an influence trying to make Scientology controversial. But the Scientology books help people lead better lives and that gets them recommended. That is how it spreads.

And that is the true overview of Scientology. It is nothing else.

How Does Scientology View the Individual?

Scientology holds that there are three parts to Man:

http://www.scientology.org/what-is-scientology/basic-principles-of-scientology/the-parts-of-man.html

First there is the body itself. The body is the organized physical composition or substance of Man, whether living or dead. It is not the being himself.

Next, there is the mind, which consists essentially of pictures.

Finally, and most importantly, there is the thetan. The thetan is not a thing. It is the creator of things.

Of the three parts of Man, the thetan is, obviously, most important. Without the thetan, there would be no mind or animation in the body. While without a body or a mind, there is still animation and life in the thetan.

For more information, I recommend reading the book Scientology: The Fundamentals of Thought by L. Ron Hubbard.

Personal Integrity

One of my favorite essays by L. Ron Hubbard is titled “Personal Integrity,” and it was this one aspect of the religious beliefs that first endeared me to this religion and made Scientology so friendly and welcoming to my own temperament and personal belief system when I first encountered the subject.

The entire premise of personal integrity is summed up by Mr. Hubbard in the first paragraph of the essay:  “What is true for you is what you have observed yourself. And when you lose that, you have lost everything.”

Imagine how that sounded to me after 14 years of being told what to think in my “formal education.”  It was almost as if someone was telling me “I trust your judgment, why don’t you?”

I had to step back and look, and when I did I  realized that when I did look for myself rather than accept what teachers, boyfriends, girlfriends, parents, politicians, “authorities”… said I should see or believe and judged based on my own observation, I was usually right.  And even when I was wrong, I could at least say, “Well, that’s what I decided.” And not have to use some lame excuse of “well they told me….”

It was many years ago that I realized I could and should and had to look for myself.  It was a turning point in my life.  And I must say my life has been going a whole lot better ever since.