The Logic of the Trilemma

Here is the logic of Josh McDowell’s version of the Trilemma argument found in Chapter 7 of Evidence that Demands a Verdict and Chapter 2 of More Than a Carpenter:

1. Jesus claimed to be God.

2. If Jesus claimed to be God, and Jesus was not God, and Jesus knew that he was not God, then Jesus was a liar.

3. If Jesus claimed to be God, and Jesus was not God, and Jesus did not know that he was not God, then Jesus was mentally ill.

Therefore:

4. Either Jesus was a liar, or Jesus was mentally ill, or Jesus was God.

5. It is not the case that Jesus was a liar.

6. It is not the case that Jesus was mentally ill.

Therefore:

7. Jesus was God.

As formulated here, this is a deductively valid argument (both inferences are valid).

"I am writing for anyone who has an interest in philosophy of religion, and who ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
"I assume by "Modal thinking in philosophy" you are talking about the sorts of presumptions ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
"Modal thinking in philosophy assumes that the laws of physics are fixed, while postulaing that ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
"When I speak of "worlds", I am speaking in the sense used in modal logics, ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment