Trilemma Update

On my blog, I have recently returned to working on an analysis and evaluation of the Trilemma argument for the deity of Jesus:

http://crossexamination.blogspot.com/search/label/Trilemma

Post #8 and on: Does the evidence from the synoptic Gospels for the premise that “Jesus claimed to be God” hold up under closer examination?

Posts #4 – #7: Most leading Jesus scholars reject the assumption that the Gospel of John is a reliable source of the words and teachings of Jesus, so we can safely ignore about 90% of the evidence that McDowell gives in support of the premise “Jesus claimed to be God”.

Post #3: A number of the passages McDowell cites from the Gospel of John are either unclear or irrelevant in relation to the premise that “Jesus claimed to be God”.

Posts #1 and #2: Introduction to, and analysis of McDowell’s Trilemma argument.

"Just to respond briefly to those assertions I could readily make sense of:Neither Newton nor ..."

The Laws of Physics and the ..."
"I've presented a similar position over on Reppert's blog: that the person acting for good ..."

The Laws of Physics and the ..."
"Epistemic voluntarism is not the only alternative to Dr. Parson's "which ethical or epistemic norms ..."

The Laws of Physics and the ..."
"Dianelos,I am not ignoring you, but, as a practical matter, you and I are so ..."

The Laws of Physics and the ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment