Friendly Atheism, Reasonable Nonbelief, and Unfriendly Apologetics

I am what William Rowe calls a “friendly atheist.” I respect many Christian philosophers and other theistic philosophers. I do not believe they are irrational or suffer from a mental disorder, as some “unfriendly atheists” have claimed.

Similarly, I know Christian philosophers who I happily describe as “friendly theists;” I’ve always enjoyed my interactions with them. Other theists, on the other hand, may be described as “unfriendly theists.” For example, some theists seem to believe–almost as a matter of doctrine–that all nonbelievers are guilty of irrationality that is motivated by sin. In the terminology of John Schellenberg, they just can’t admit that reasonable nonbelief obtains.

I’m hoping for more friendly atheism, friendly theism, and friendly “otherism” (my catchall word for anyone who doesn’t identify as an atheist or a theist).

"Numbers and ideas "may not be relevant" in terms of a significant objection to Kreeft's ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
"He isn't talking about something Aquinas argued, but rather is talking about problems with Aristotelian ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
"He says: "The result, says my colleague, includes many an argument for some form of ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
""Therefore, what it takes for the universe to exist must transcend both space and time."My ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment