LINK: Mikael Stenmark on Evolution, Purpose, and God

A number of biologists maintain that the recent developments in evolutionary biology have profound implications for religion, morality and our self-understanding. The author focuses on the issue whether evolutionary biology has any relevance for a religious understanding of the meaning of life. First, the question about the meaning of life is clarified. Second, the argument of biologists such as Richard Dawkins, Stephen Jay Gould and Edward O. Wilson, that evolutionary theory undermines the religious belief that there is a purpose or meaning to the existence of the universe and to human life in particular, is evaluated. The author maintains that this argument has some merit, but that it nevertheless fails both to be a purely scientific argument and to establish the intended conclusion.


"Hello Ryan, here are a few key problems I see in the Thomist version of ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
"Here is an idea...I could attempt to construct a series of posts that form a ..."

Why I Reject the Resurrection – ..."
"I often summarize my posts at the end of the post and/or at the beginning ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
"Good point. In my next post on Kreeft's case I will take a step back, ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment