LINK: From Friendly Atheism to Friendly Natural Theology

Jeffery Johnson, “From Friendly Atheism to Friendly Natural Theology: The Case for Modesty in Religious Epistemology” Minerva – An Internet Journal of Philosophy Vol. 7 2003.


Abstract

Philosophical theists argue with great ingenuity and sophistication that there is excellent evidence in support of the existence of the God of western theism. Philosophical atheists argue with equal skill that the evidence is negative. Both sides can’t be right. But, this seems to imply that one camp is guilty of serious epistemological error. I explore in this essay a way of understanding good theological evidence that mitigates charges of intellectual error or blindness. According to a position that Rowe calls friendly atheism, the atheist can argue that the relevant evidence supports his or her view, but that theists are rationally justified in believing that God exists in spite of the intense suffering that manifest in this world. I will argue that friendly atheism, and more generally friendly natural theology, when articulated in more detail, and with great care, represents an important metaphilosophical insight about use of evidence in theological contexts.

LINK

"Keith,I hear ya. I'm sure we have not seen the last of brazen attempts to ..."

Tolerating the Intolerant: The Central Paradox ..."
"I am sure they would too. They would never admit that one of their arguments ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
"p.s. Yes, I have mixed feelings about the rotating/majoritarian question. There are certainly instances when ..."

Tolerating the Intolerant: The Central Paradox ..."
"OK, I will write some relevant paragraphs:I see three overlapping fundamentalisms today in the US: ..."

Tolerating the Intolerant: The Central Paradox ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment