Don McIntosh’s Reply to Keith Parsons on Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence

Internet Infidels just published the following on The Secular Web:

The Presumption of Naturalism and the Probability of Miracles: A Reply to Keith Parsons” by Don McIntosh.

Abstract:

In Chapter Four of Science, Confirmation, and the Theistic Hypothesis, Keith Parsons defends the dictum that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence as part of a general critique of miracle claims which aims to defend naturalism as a rational operating philosophy against potential defeaters. In this defense of miracle claims Don McIntosh argues, first, that for any unknown the burden of proof falls equally upon naturalists and supernaturalists; second, to repudiate all miracle claims in one fell swoop with a mere presumption of naturalism renders naturalism unfalsifiable and unscientific; and third, estimating the prior probability of miracles introduces an element of subjectivity that makes any general probabilistic argument against them suspect. These points leave open the possibility of confirming specific miracle claims on the basis of historical evidence and eyewitness testimony.

"I’d like contribute some thoughts on the issue of NDEs.As it happens I am a ..."

Can you know what it is ..."
"There are about a half dozen psi phenomenon that have been tested extensively enough for ..."

Can you know what it is ..."
"Hi Keith, apologies for leaping right in without addressing you. I am a huge fan ..."

Can you know what it is ..."
"David,Glad I lured you out into the open!For a), we appear to be interactive 2-component ..."

Can you know what it is ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment