LINK: “But Theists Do It Too: An Objection To Plantinga’s EAAN” by Jimmy Licon

Abstract: In this paper, I present an objection to Plantinga’s evolutionary argument against naturalism called the theistic parity reply. Since traditional theism holds there is a great deal about the thoughts/intentions of God that is unknown to his creations, it could be that God desires that his subjects lack doxastic reliability for some good, unknown to them. If such a scenario cannot be blocked by the theist, then she must admit the probability her cognitive faculties are reliable is inscrutable; thus she would be rationally required to relinquish all of her beliefs, including her theistic belief.


"I will continue to analyze and evaluate the rest of Kreeft's arguments ; five more ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
"I'm more so saying this particular forum is not the place to discuss psychological arguments ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
"Keith:1) Pinker rewtweeted your article: Great to "hear from you" via the article! ("

Conservative Pundit Ross Douthat Takes on ..."
"Your discussion has been very interestting and it doesn't surprise me that you got so ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment