LINK: Nate Shannon on Anderson and Welty’s Ambiguous Necessity

“In their argument for the existence of God from the laws of logic,* James Anderson and Greg Welty (AW) claim that the laws of logic exist necessarily. Their claim is that the laws of logic possess de re necessity, the type of necessity—metaphysical necessity—predicated of objects. How do they get there? They don’t, in my view, and their oversight is a smooth ambiguity between de re and de dicto necessity.”

LINK

"I read several reviews of Dr Baruss's book and yes, I am interested. Thanks!"

Can you know what it is ..."
"RV testing has been done extensively, has produced statistically significant postiive results https://www.ics.uci.edu/~ju... Well that ..."

Can you know what it is ..."
"I don't find an appeal to complexity as having much explanatory power for the mind. ..."

Can you know what it is ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment