Atheist Ethicist: Theism, Atheism, and Blame

This is an old post, but worth linking to now regardless. Alonzo Fyfe at the Atheist Ethicist makes this important point.

If you take “atheism” and its counter-part “theism” NEITHER of these are a source of violence or evil. You cannot draw any moral implications from the statement, “It is not the case that at least one God exists” just as you cannot draw any moral implication from the statement, “It is the case that at least one God exists.” They are both behaviorally, morally, and practically impotent.

In order to get to any moral conclusion – any type at all – you have to add something to your fundamental premise, regardless of whether it is atheist or theist.

Atheist Ethicist: Theism, Atheism, and Blame

"p.s.Hello again,Please consider my sincere apologies for the unfair imputation, and also my tone. Nasty ..."

Tolerating the Intolerant: The Central Paradox ..."
""The facts you list are generally not at issue in POE or POO debates."If this ..."

Problems With TASO – Part 2: ..."
"Yes. The Christian concept of God is complex; it has many elements. Furthermore, each of ..."

Problems With TASO – Part 2: ..."
""If an absolutely perfect being exists, then God exists." Nope, that's a non-sequitur. Since Kreeft ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment