Atheist Ethicist: Theism, Atheism, and Blame

This is an old post, but worth linking to now regardless. Alonzo Fyfe at the Atheist Ethicist makes this important point.

If you take “atheism” and its counter-part “theism” NEITHER of these are a source of violence or evil. You cannot draw any moral implications from the statement, “It is not the case that at least one God exists” just as you cannot draw any moral implication from the statement, “It is the case that at least one God exists.” They are both behaviorally, morally, and practically impotent.

In order to get to any moral conclusion – any type at all – you have to add something to your fundamental premise, regardless of whether it is atheist or theist.

Atheist Ethicist: Theism, Atheism, and Blame

"I have bought into the tentative, evidence based, hypothesis forming of Popper's empiricism. I start ..."

Can you know what it is ..."
"For the record, I would call myself a dualist who is not committed to any ..."

Can you know what it is ..."
"dcleve, thanks for responding. So it seems you are a bonafied Cartesian substance dualist! That's ..."

Can you know what it is ..."
"Jayman,Thanks for your thoughtful response. First, a bit of a clarification: I am not myself ..."

Can you know what it is ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment