Gregory Dawes: Religion, Science, and Explanation

Abstract: A recent legal ruling in the United States regarding ‘intelligent design’ (ID) argued that ID is not science because it invokes a supernatural agent. It therefore cannot be taught in public schools. But the important philosophical question is not whether ID invokes a supernatural agent; it is whether it meets the standards we expect of any explanation in the sciences. More generally, could any proposed theistic explanation – one that invokes the deity of classical theism – meet those standards? Could it be both scientific and religious? The present paper sets out the factors to be taken into account when answering this question.


"Where did I say, entail, or presuppose that the counter to hell-on-Earth is "threats of ..."

Richard Dawkins, Stephen Hawking, and a ..."
"By deciding for those humans that all possible doctrines of hell are "morally odious", you ..."

Richard Dawkins, Stephen Hawking, and a ..."
"Just playing the devil's advocate here, the fact that Hawking committed the worst sin imaginable: ..."

Richard Dawkins, Stephen Hawking, and a ..."
"Yet the doctrine of hell itself is the greatest impediment to clear and rational thinking ..."

Richard Dawkins, Stephen Hawking, and a ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment